Is retaking the GOP the real goal of the Tea Party Movement?

  • Share on Tumblr

The two-party system has failed miserably as sadly, both parties support the status quo…BIG GOVERNMENT and therein lies the problem.

The fundamental question is whether this is what the Founders desired?

If we believe the Founders wanted a HUGE bloated ever-encroaching federal bureaucracy, the current two-party system fits the bill.  However, there’s one problem with this scenario, we have to assume the Founders failed to realize that one-half of the country would perpetually be angry at the other.  They must have also failed to realize that this anger would at times be expressed in rather violent terms such as the one I heard yesterday as I attended the “Republican Rally” in Washington DC.  One fella, standing about 15 feet away from me wasn’t content with the “kill the bill” chant.  No, he had to modify it to “kill the traitors” chant of his own.  Fortunately, not many people around him joined in the chant, but I wonder about his friends back home.

So, is the problem really that the GOP isn’t populated with enough “conservative republicans” (whatever that means) and that the republicans aren’t in control?  My experience tells me that’s not the problem.

Think of it this way; let your mind wander to a time where the federal government isn’t allowed, by a binding constitution, to grow to its current size.  What would life be like if the federal government was forced to reduce its spending (and thus our taxes) back to pre-New Deal days of say around 5% of GDP?  That would take the current budget from $3.8 TRILLION down to a more manageable $700 Billion.

Now, with only $700 Billion to spend, perhaps the job of Congressman wouldn’t be as coveted as it is now.  Perhaps the special interests wouldn’t be so tempted to gerrymander elections with less than noble intentions and the Congress would be left largely to focus on their Constitutional responsibilities listed in Article 1. Section 8. of the Constitution.

Hmmm, whatever would they do with their time!

Sadly, this can only be seen if we let our minds wander; for the reality is, the two-party system will never allow this dream to become a reality unless We the People make them.  They love their ruling seats in the Congress.  How do I know this?  I saw it first hand as a Legislative Assistant back in the 1980’s.  Lord Acton was indeed correct, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

EXCERPTED – CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL ARTICLE

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

,

4 comments
Josh
Josh

I have often thought that a two party system would be just fine, so long as it was composed of the federalists and the anti-federalists.

We need legitimate and sincere competition between federal and state authority, competition grounded in intellectual honesty and the fundamental power-limiting, liberty enhancing premise of the Constitution.

Right now all we have is two different versions of totalitarianism.

If the Tea Party activists really want to gain influence for their views, they need to forget about reanimating the corpse of the RNC and start concentrating on taking over local and state party chapters (Republican or Democrat), then using them as leverage against federal power grabs.

Monorprise
Monorprise

I agree Josh, but the same party/political machine that controls local and state politics also controls federal politics in most cases. So while we are focused on taking on State and local governments, we should not negate the opportunity to get Federal officials who will at the very least not resist state level actions to take back power, and at the very best (thou i doubt they will deliver much here) help.

Yes taking control of congress and the presidency are and should be low priority (due to the weakness of that office and our meager means to hold a significant enough weight over them to accomplish the needed goals of decentralization).

But electing a few either incompetent or resolute people in into those offices capable of obstructing/sabotaging the Federal machinery with regard to responding to our States will in the long run be most helpful. That minimal task i think we can accomplish on the federal level even with the corruption, and it could mean a lot to give our State and local official an even stronger hand.

It helps if your opponent either doesn't want to win, or is incompetent. (We can help deliver that to our States)

Monorprise
Monorprise

I agree to the terms, sounds like a good long term plan. Thou I quite imagine we will have a great deal of trouble implementing it. This will be most difficult.

mek1959
mek1959

Hey Monorpise,

Indeed, whatever the means, reaching the goal is what's important. These Really Tough decisions are just that, REALLY HARD. Yet, as we all know, it's what has to be done and I will only support some candidate that will in some manner support these goals. My only fear is that there aren't any with the intestional fortitutde to say what really must be said.