Oklahoma Passes Health Care Freedom Act, Heads to Governor

OKLAHOMA CITY – In a move Sen. Randy Brogdon said was designed to protect the sovereignty of Oklahoma, the full Senate gave its approval Tuesday to House Joint Resolution 1054. The “Freedom of Healthcare Choice Act” is authored by Sen. Randy Brogdon R-Owasso, Rep. Mike Ritze, R-Broken Arrow, and Rep. Mike Reynolds, R-Oklahoma City.

“This legislation does three things. It would prevent the federal government from forcing any Oklahoman to participate in any health care system. It would also prohibit the federal government from dictating how doctors choose to care for their patients,” Brogdon said. “Finally, the measure authorizes the leaders of the Legislature to hire outside council to represent Oklahoma in a lawsuit to prevent Obamacare from being forced on our state.”

Debating for the measure, Brogdon pointed out numerous problems in countries that have socialized medicine, including unreasonable waiting periods for treatment, rationing of medical care and even refusal to cover some procedures and medications.

“I believe Oklahomans should have the freedom to choose their own healthcare and insurance plans—and I believe if we have to go to court to fight for that right then we should. Unfortunately our Attorney General has refused to stand up for the people of this state and has declined to file suit,” Brogdon said. “HJR 1054 authorizes our Pro Tempore and Speaker to hire outside council. The good news is that we already have outside attorneys that have volunteered to take this case pro bono.”

The measure was approved by the Senate, but the emergency clause, which would have allowed the bill to become law immediately upon the governor’s signature, was not. If a vote to reconsider the emergency clause does not occur within three legislative days, the measure will proceed to the governor in its current form. If approved by the governor, it would become law 90 days after Sine Die (final) adjournment of the Legislature.

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO SENATOR BROGDON’S CLOSING DEBATE ON THE FLOOR

CLICK HERE to view the Tenth Amendment Center’s Health Care Freedom Act legislative tracking page

The Tenth Amendment Center has released the Federal Health Care Nullification Act, which directly nullifies the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” on a state level. Click here to learn more.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

,

14 comments
kevin
kevin

because "“I believe Oklahomans should have the freedom to choose their own healthcare and insurance plans" has a better ring than "i believe that a profit driven corporate entity should choose who gets to live"

kevin
kevin

because "“I believe Oklahomans should have the freedom to choose their own healthcare and insurance plans" sounds better than "i believe a profit driven corporate entity should decide who lives and dies"

Guest
Guest

How silly. I wonder how many of those people will want health care if one of their kids get sick and gets dropped from having any coverage? OR if they get sick and reach the current 1mill limit on most medical policies. Just don't cross the border to another state, stay there....and continue with those backwards views. Oklahoma seemed to be more to the center when I was growing up there, but they are far right off on the side of the road, driving over potholes and ditches now. Oklahoma means red man, get a clue.... Geez, who would want to even visit a place like that? Gun commercials have taken over the car commercials--this is not the BUSH, it's America, modern America, let's hope we continue to lead instead of packing guns to Wal-Mart, and Denny's--how silly is that? Just because you have a right to do something, you don't have to actually do it. You also have a right to walk around nude on a nude beach, that doesn't mean you actually need to do it, let's hope for the sake of sanity, keep you clothes on, and your gun in your house.

American Citizen
American Citizen

The Supremacy clause applies to the 18 enumerated powers delegated to the federal government by the states.As written in the constitution. The distortions of historical fact and usurpations by all the branches of the federal government, especially the judiciary over the course of our young republic are imbedded in our nations fabric as made up fact. Individuals who continually espouse the Governments position of supreme law, contrary to original intent, historical record, and the founders own words, show that those individuals have: 1)Not done the necessary research of historical fact on the subject for their own satisfaction and knowledge. 2) Believe what the government and a cooperative media continue to spoon feed them on a daily basis without any critical thought. 3) are of the belief that the constitution is meant to be twisted and morphed into the popular culture of the present day based on blowing political winds. Or lastly, This pains me the worst to post, said individuals are incapable of being Rugged individual sovereign citizens of these states united and rely upon the largess removed from one citizen and redistributed to another citizen, after being laundered through the federal treasury. And therefore will gleefully promote all the talking points and positions emanating from whoever the current occupants happen to be presiding over the fate and future of this republic. If you disagree, your probably in one of those categories mentioned above, or a racistnaziteabaggerterroristMcvieghwaanabe.

Lis
Lis

Federal law which violates the constitution trumps NOTHING. The commerce clause will not protect the mandatory health insurance aspect of this legislation. Not to mention Obama, the agent of unity, is not doing much to endear himself to the court. Stuff like that shouldn't matter, but it does. Like it or not, the court is partisan.

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

Mark, Ben - federal law supercedes state law...period? What an ignorant statement!

So let's see - federal law says that marijuana is illegal in EVERY situation, no matter what. Cancer patient in California? Nah...send em to jail! That's what you're saying? That federal agents should arrest hundreds of thousands of medical marijuana card holders around the country and throw em in prison for violating federal law?

Or, let's say the feds pass a law banning gay marriage - should they go in and break up couples who got married in Mass.?

hmmm...interesting. You both sound like some nasty thugs - or just really mis-informed.

brey
brey

The example you gave is terrible.

why do you think the feds were raiding medicinal marijuana shops/factories in california?

For the exact reason that federal law supercedes state law.

Guy
Guy

Too bad both of your examples are bogus. Are you as misinformed or as thugish as the people you criticise?

Irony at its best.

Mark Manley
Mark Manley

Is Brogdon forgetting all the Americans who lose their insurance when their insurance company learns they are sick, all the procedures they refuse to pay for and all the people that totally lose their insurance when they lose their jobs? Of course there's the small issue that Federal law supersedes State law and this vote, if it comes to that, will be meaningless.

Anathemys
Anathemys

"Is Brogdon forgetting all the Americans who lose their insurance when their insurance company learns they are sick, all the procedures they refuse to pay for and all the people that totally lose their insurance when they lose their jobs?"

Answer: Yes.

ben
ben

Too bad federal law trumps state laws and this is another pointless bill passed when Oklahoma could have been doing something useful with their legislature. The Healthcare reform bill passed by the Federal Government will probably not even go to the Supreme Court.

John Q
John Q

Federal law does not trump state law. Read the 10th amendment. Anything not specifically granted by the constitution for the feds to do (mandate health insurance) is reserved for the states. The fed has no constitutional authority to pass this bill.

Jacob
Jacob

20 bucks says it'll be constitutional: commerce clause. Whether you like it or not, precedence is there for that argument.

Mitchell
Mitchell

Yeah, lets see how that works....

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Oklahoma: On May 4, 2010, the Oklahoma Legislature passed HJR 1054. The Freedom of Health Care Choice Act was co-authored by Senator Randy Brogdon (R-Owasso), Representative Mike Ritze (R-Broken Arrow), and Representative Mike Reynolds (R-Oklahoma City). In a May 4 report by the Tenth Amendment Center, Senator Brogdon made the following remarks: [...]

  2. [...] Randy Brogdon R-Owasso, Rep. Mike Ritze, R-Broken Arrow, and Rep. Mike Reynolds, R-Oklahoma City. Read The Full Story Comments closed | Trackback [...]

  3. [...] post: Oklahoma Passes Health Care Freedom Act, Heads to Governor | Tenth … Categories: Health, Object Tags: 77-5-years, clients, Health, life-expectancy, oklahomans, [...]

  4. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Senator Chuck Gray, Gerardo Horvilleur, Dominique, bopo and others. bopo said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: Oklahoma Passes Health Care Freedom Act, Heads to Governor http://bit.ly/cvW6zD [...]