<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1984 in 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/1984-in-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/1984-in-2011/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philosopherking</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/1984-in-2011/#comment-3896</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosopherking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6169#comment-3896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve notice that the left kind of uses language tricks in order to silence free-thought.   The first paragraph of this article kind of reminded me of that because the left does not out-right make thought illegal but uses terms like &#039;extremist&#039; to label people whose views are outside what they judge as conventional.   Conventional then becomes the acceptable range for what people should think.  Don&#039;t go to far to the right because then you wouldn&#039;t be &#039;moderate&#039; and that is not OK to Big Brother.    
  
I&#039;ve also noticed that the left likes to use descriptors such as homo-PHOBIC which implies that the hatred of gays is a mental disorder that can be treated.   While that kind of prejidice may not be acceptable in any moral standard likeining it to a phobia shows the inner thinking of the left where unpopular ideas can be fixed in the same way any other mental illnesses can be treated.  Human beings don&#039;t hate but have mental disorders.  The difference is that being hateful is a persaonal decision you make of your own free-will while a phobia was not of  your own free-will so it is invalid.  It reflects and attitude that human beings don&#039;t have free-will. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve notice that the left kind of uses language tricks in order to silence free-thought.   The first paragraph of this article kind of reminded me of that because the left does not out-right make thought illegal but uses terms like &#039;extremist&#039; to label people whose views are outside what they judge as conventional.   Conventional then becomes the acceptable range for what people should think.  Don&#039;t go to far to the right because then you wouldn&#039;t be &#039;moderate&#039; and that is not OK to Big Brother.    </p>
<p>I&#039;ve also noticed that the left likes to use descriptors such as homo-PHOBIC which implies that the hatred of gays is a mental disorder that can be treated.   While that kind of prejidice may not be acceptable in any moral standard likeining it to a phobia shows the inner thinking of the left where unpopular ideas can be fixed in the same way any other mental illnesses can be treated.  Human beings don&#039;t hate but have mental disorders.  The difference is that being hateful is a persaonal decision you make of your own free-will while a phobia was not of  your own free-will so it is invalid.  It reflects and attitude that human beings don&#039;t have free-will. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
