<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire vs the TSA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Master List of TSA Scandals &#8211; Crimes and Abuse &#124; Master List of TSA Scandals</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-18198</link>
		<dc:creator>Master List of TSA Scandals &#8211; Crimes and Abuse &#124; Master List of TSA Scandals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-18198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 20:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So... Have you look at the statistics? Just asking... You have a greater chance to be shot to death at the mall than die in a terrorist attack. In case you hadn&#039;t realized, the scanners can&#039;t see anything concealed in your body but I&#039;m sure dogs would be able to sniff it. Anyway, if you have time, just try to find out how many people died in a car crash just today. Then compare it with the amount of people who died both in a plane terrorist attack and in any other terrorist attck in our country since September 11. Maybe you&#039;ll start thinking on your own instead of believing the bullshit your government is telling you. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; Have you look at the statistics? Just asking&#8230; You have a greater chance to be shot to death at the mall than die in a terrorist attack. In case you hadn&#039;t realized, the scanners can&#039;t see anything concealed in your body but I&#039;m sure dogs would be able to sniff it. Anyway, if you have time, just try to find out how many people died in a car crash just today. Then compare it with the amount of people who died both in a plane terrorist attack and in any other terrorist attck in our country since September 11. Maybe you&#039;ll start thinking on your own instead of believing the bullshit your government is telling you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commonsenseindy</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4205</link>
		<dc:creator>commonsenseindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were no terrorist attacks when the TSA was simply screening people with their metal detectors. Why do we need &quot;enhanced&quot; pat downs and &quot;enhanced&quot; screenings of our citizens by untrained, uneducated, non-citizen  goons? Try 1,000 scanners X $200,000 each equals 200 million dollars. And, Obama signed that contract.  
 
Keep up your good work.  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were no terrorist attacks when the TSA was simply screening people with their metal detectors. Why do we need &quot;enhanced&quot; pat downs and &quot;enhanced&quot; screenings of our citizens by untrained, uneducated, non-citizen  goons? Try 1,000 scanners X $200,000 each equals 200 million dollars. And, Obama signed that contract.  </p>
<p>Keep up your good work.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profisherman</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4204</link>
		<dc:creator>profisherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jayratch, 
notice how it was not in quotes, and I did not bastardize the quote. Whether this was actually said by franklin is not the point. I am not falsely attributing my opinion to ben franklin, simply agreeing with him. Yes exposing my body to dangerous radiation or an enhanced patdown is a 4th amendment violation. sorry that you don&#039;t see it that way. this is exactly the tradeoff they are asking us to make. we should waive our 4th amendment rights as a condition of getting on an airplane so we can be &quot;safe&quot; (temporary security). . the funny thing is we are getting neither. because as I said it is a THEATER.  we all know that. do you really  think you are safer? really? this is a perfect application of this quote widely attributed to ben franklin. the more we ask the government to protect and take care of us, the less free we are.  i don&#039;t want the government trying to keep me safe by assaulting me at an airport. i guess you do. everybody is entitled to their opinion, for at least a little longer anyway.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayratch,<br />
notice how it was not in quotes, and I did not bastardize the quote. Whether this was actually said by franklin is not the point. I am not falsely attributing my opinion to ben franklin, simply agreeing with him. Yes exposing my body to dangerous radiation or an enhanced patdown is a 4th amendment violation. sorry that you don&#039;t see it that way. this is exactly the tradeoff they are asking us to make. we should waive our 4th amendment rights as a condition of getting on an airplane so we can be &quot;safe&quot; (temporary security). . the funny thing is we are getting neither. because as I said it is a THEATER.  we all know that. do you really  think you are safer? really? this is a perfect application of this quote widely attributed to ben franklin. the more we ask the government to protect and take care of us, the less free we are.  i don&#039;t want the government trying to keep me safe by assaulting me at an airport. i guess you do. everybody is entitled to their opinion, for at least a little longer anyway.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayratch</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, the quote is &quot;those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.&quot; He went on to talk about self defense.  
 
This is perhaps the single most bastardized quote from libertarians, and poorly attributed at that; it&#039;s attribution to Franklin is not known with great certainty. But the essence of the misquote is &quot;essential liberty.&quot; Is privacy, in an airport, an essential liberty? Is the possible avoidance of violent death a little temporary safety? 
 
You can argue those questions as much as you like, but please don&#039;t invent a false dichotomy between unsafe freedom and safe tyranny, sans middle ground, by falsely attributing your opinion to a libertine liberal diplomat.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the quote is &quot;those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.&quot; He went on to talk about self defense.  </p>
<p>This is perhaps the single most bastardized quote from libertarians, and poorly attributed at that; it&#039;s attribution to Franklin is not known with great certainty. But the essence of the misquote is &quot;essential liberty.&quot; Is privacy, in an airport, an essential liberty? Is the possible avoidance of violent death a little temporary safety? </p>
<p>You can argue those questions as much as you like, but please don&#039;t invent a false dichotomy between unsafe freedom and safe tyranny, sans middle ground, by falsely attributing your opinion to a libertine liberal diplomat.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3BlindMice</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4202</link>
		<dc:creator>3BlindMice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better not take the train or bus, either.   And, I hear that west of Atlanta, there are VIPR vans on the interstate highways too! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better not take the train or bus, either.   And, I hear that west of Atlanta, there are VIPR vans on the interstate highways too! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Deniro</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Deniro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Put your entirely irrational fear aside for a moment and consider these three thoughts. 
 
1 - You are far more likely to die in an automobile collision on your way to the airport than from a terrorist attack. 
 
2 - You are far more likely to die from pilot error or mechanical failure than from a terrorist attack. 
 
3 - If you still choose to live in fear, then stay home. You can choose to waive YOUR Constitutional rights...you can not waive anybody else&#039;s rights. To think that everyone else should be denied their rights to appease your irrational fears is not only incredibly selfish, but inherently un-American. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put your entirely irrational fear aside for a moment and consider these three thoughts. </p>
<p>1 &#8211; You are far more likely to die in an automobile collision on your way to the airport than from a terrorist attack. </p>
<p>2 &#8211; You are far more likely to die from pilot error or mechanical failure than from a terrorist attack. </p>
<p>3 &#8211; If you still choose to live in fear, then stay home. You can choose to waive YOUR Constitutional rights&#8230;you can not waive anybody else&#039;s rights. To think that everyone else should be denied their rights to appease your irrational fears is not only incredibly selfish, but inherently un-American. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libsux</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4200</link>
		<dc:creator>libsux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TSA is merely an extension of the communist conspiracy to make all of the citizens into the proletariat of the marxist thugs that now run congress , senate, DOJ, TSA and the new GOD of AmeriKa comrade 0buma. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSA is merely an extension of the communist conspiracy to make all of the citizens into the proletariat of the marxist thugs that now run congress , senate, DOJ, TSA and the new GOD of AmeriKa comrade 0buma. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Watts</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4199</link>
		<dc:creator>C Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You deserve to die at the hands of cowards as you are too weak to embrace FREEDOM! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You deserve to die at the hands of cowards as you are too weak to embrace FREEDOM! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/02/new-hampshire-vs-the-tsa/#comment-4198</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6854#comment-4198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can&#039;t anymore. TSA opted out of the option for airports to opt out. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can&#039;t anymore. TSA opted out of the option for airports to opt out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
