Or, at least, we think alike.
The junior Senator from Kentucky recently said that to believe in a “right” to health care one must support slavery:
I’m a physician. That means you have a right to come to my house and conscript me. It means you believe in slavery.
He’s right of course. As I pointed out nearly two years ago, it is impossible for government to grant a positive right, like health care, to anyone without first taking the good or service it is granting away from someone else, like a doctor.
As I said then
Whether by forcibly appropriating and redistributing the money to purchase care for those who lack it, or by arbitrarily devaluing the time and effort of those who provide it, once a government mandate supplants voluntary exchange, coercion must be used to exercise that “right” to health care.
But how can taking what belongs to another person (their money, time, or effort) through legislative force be a right?
Is that not the very essence of slavery?
It is, and it’s nice to see someone as prominent and influential as Rand Paul has the guts to say it.
Latest posts by Josh (see all)
- Rand Paul Reads TenthAmendmentCenter.com - May 16, 2011
- New England Nullification Movement Grows - May 10, 2011
- Oklahoma governor puts taxpayers’ money where her mouth is - April 15, 2011