by Dick Cheatham No, I’m not talking about the Pilgrims who, as stated in their own Mayflower Compact, sailed to the “Northerne parts of Virginia” in 1620. (There was no Massachusetts colony yet.) That well-known Pilgrim “thanksgiving” came years after one I’m talking about. I refer to a thanksgiving celebrated further south in Virginia on the…Details
It is amazing that during Thanksgiving week, there are still some obsessing publicly over the presidential election earlier this month. A recent article from World Net Daily details how the Electoral College could be prevented from selecting a president. To add to a Tenther’s list of reasons to be thankful, let’s include no longer being wrapped up in this nonsense.
Technically, Judson Phillips is correct as he outlines the ways in which the Twelfth Amendment can prevent President Obama from serving another term. In order for the Electoral Votes to be certified, a quorum of two-thirds of the 50 states must participate in the Electoral College. If seventeen of the twenty-four states can be persuaded to do this, the Electoral College will not have a quorum and will be unable to renew Obama’s lease at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Phillips calls on readers in what could call dubbed the “Twelfther” movement to contact the Secretaries of State in the states Romney carried and tell them not to participate in the Electoral College in the hopes of denying Democratic states the necessary quorum.
If the Electoral College does not choose a president, the decision constitutionally goes to the Congress, with the Republican-dominated House being likely to choose Romney as president and the enlarged Democrat majority in the Senate reelecting Vice President Joe Biden to his post. If that happens, what then?
Phillips admits Romney would not be a great president, but he would be better than Obama. How much better, in terms of results, would a Romney presidency be given the current makeup of Congress? Let’s explore this.Details
by Christina Sandefur, Goldwater Institute
As last week’s so-called “deadline” for states to decide whether or not to establish a “health insurance exchange” came and went, Arizonans were given good news: Governor Jan Brewer will not stick Arizona taxpayers with the bill for implementing the new federal health insurance mandates – for now. The Governor has decided to delay her decision as she continues to study Arizona’s options.
Early on, some state policymakers were misled into thinking that setting up a state exchange would give them flexibility from federal control. There’s also been discussion of urgent “deadlines” states must meet to “comply” with the federal law.
Federal bureaucrats, ill equipped to execute a comprehensive takeover of the nation’s health insurance industry, have been hoping governors and legislatures would buy these stories.
What the feds don’t want states to know is that federal law does not require states to establish exchanges. In fact, there’s no rush to make a decision – states may opt in at any time. If states choose not to set up an exchange, the federal government will have to create and fund one on its own.
Fortunately, governors across the country are finally learning the truth about insurance exchanges.Details
“People have been brainwashed. People have been told that you need this income tax system to fund government, which is absolutely ridiculous. My question is that if that is true, then how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913.” – Peter Gibbons, Tax Attorney.
I can’t even count the number of false arguments I have heard to defend the federal governments collection of federal income tax. Among them….
“Who’s going to pay for the highway system?”
“What about our public schools?”
“We have to support our military!”
“What about traffic lights and stop signs, and street signs”
Let’s just pretend for a minute that all of these are constitutional programs that the federal government has the authority to fund. Doing some research I found that…
Schools are paid for by property tax.
Highways are paid for by gasoline tax.
Military is paid for by corporate tax.
Sales taxes pay for an array of local needs, including traffic signals.
Incidentally, the program that most conservatives critique, the federal welfare program, is paid for by Social Security tax. One unconstitutional program, paying for another.
Let’s examine history for a moment and find out why our federal income tax is so high, and how it became so out of control.Details