Kurk’s proposed legislation regulates the use of drones by governments, as well as individuals. It requires search warrants, levies fines, and does not allow for the lethal or nonlethal arming of drones in the state.Details
JACKSON, Miss., January 24, 2014 – With the introduction of the 4th Amendment Protection Act this week, Mississippi became the tenth state in the country to consider legislation to make life difficult for the NSA’s ongoing mass surveillance programs. Senate Bill 2438 (SB2438), introduced by Sen. Chris McDaniel, would make it the official policy of…Details
This question just came in on our feedback forum, and I thought it was important enough to discuss that I’d share my answer here.
QUESTION: Is the principle of anti-commandeering synonymous with nullification
ANSWER: It depends on how you define the word “nullification”
Many believe that it is defined only as John Calhoun did in 1830’s South Carolina.
Anti-commandeering is not that process.
What it is, though, is a 100% legal process, backed up by years of Supreme Court precedent, which says that the feds cannot “commandeer” state resources to carry out a federal act or regulatory program. In other words, the states are free to decide if they will participate or not.
Recognizing that many, if not most, federal programs rely heavily on this kind of cooperation, by enacting anti-commandeering laws on various issues around the country, they can have the effect of a practical nullification – rendering federal acts “nearly impossible to enforce”
House bill 3514 (H3514) would prohibit the operation of drones by an agency of the state unless it is “pursuant to a criminal warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction.”Details