Legislation has been introduced in the Massachusetts State Senate that would regulate the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) to protect the privacy rights of citizens.
S.1664, sponsored by Rep. Robert Hedlund earlier this month, has already moved to the Joint Committee on Transportation. The bill bans the weaponization of drones, disqualifies illegally-gathered information from being used in criminal investigations, and provides other safeguards that provide basic protection to MA citizens from this burgeoning technology.
Although not perfect, this bill represents a huge improvement over the status quo and would help citizens mount a defense against these menacing weapons that are already policing the skies. It has even been estimated that 30,000 drones could be in the air by 2020. If we do not take action now, our rights could be lost forever.
Tenth Amendment Center’s executive director Michael Boldin said that this kind of bill has significant ramifications at the federal level because Washington D.C. is pushing and funding drone use at the state level.
“The feds want to push these on the states, and if the states refuse, it’ll foil their plan,” he said. “They already spy on Americans so much that Rand Paul said it numbered in the ‘Gazillions’ after a secret meeting last fall. If the feds can get the states to start buying up and running drones over our cities, they’ll certainly want access to all that surveillance information in the future. It’s important that states begin drawing a line in the sand now – no aerial spying here.”
As a matter of fact, the federal government serves as the primary engine behind the expansion of drone surveillance carried out by states and local communities. The Department of Homeland Security issues large grants to local governments so they can purchase drones. Those grants, in and of themselves, represent an unconstitutional expansion of power.
The goal? Fund a network of drones around the country and put the operational burden on the states. Once they create a web over the whole country, DHS steps in with requests for ‘information sharing.’ It is in the best interest of the DHS and the rest of the federal government to bring the states on-board with their regime of constitutional destruction to shift costs, shift blame and make it easier for them to get their hands on more of your private information.
Bills like S.1664 put a dent in this kind of long-term strategy. Without the states and local communities operating the drones today, it’s going to be nearly impossible for the police state plans of the DHS to – take off.
That is why we have our model legislation, the Privacy Protection Act available for you to take to your local and state government officials and demand that they take action to protect your freedoms.
In Massachusetts – take action to support this legislation HERE
All other states – take action against unlimited drone use HERE
Latest posts by Shane Trejo (see all)
- Texas Has Four Chances to Nullify Marijuana Prohibition in 2017 - December 1, 2016
- Michigan Bill Would Set Foundation to Nullify Unconstitutional Executive Orders - November 29, 2016
- Drone Restrictions Can Help Peaceful Protesters Combat Injustice - November 4, 2016