Tag Archives | South Carolina Sovereignty

South Carolina House Passes Sovereignty Resolution

Today, the South Carolina House overwhelmingly voted in favor of S424, a resolution reaffirming sovereignty under the 10th Amendment.  The final vote was 85-27.

The resolution previously passed the Senate, and after passing amended by the House, it returns to the Senate for further action.

Here’s a few excerpts from the resolution:

Be it resolved:

That the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, claims for the State of South Carolina sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution.

Be it further resolved that the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, claims for the citizens of South Carolina and the State of South Carolina freedom from all laws and mandates that violate the rights granted under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Be it further resolved that this resolution serves as notice and demand to the federal government, as South Carolina’s agent, to cease and desist immediately all mandates that are beyond the scope of the federal government’s constitutionally delegated powers.

CLICK HERE to view the Tenth Amendment Center’s 10th amendment resolution tracking page

CLICK HERE to view the Tenth Amendment Center’s model 10th Amendment Resolution, which you can send to your representatives when urging them to introduce one in your state.

6

South Carolina Senate Affirms 10th Amendment – and more

On Tuesday, the South Carolina Senate became the 2nd legislative body in the country to approve a resolution affirming State Sovereignty. The resolution, S424, was originally introduced in the 2009 session, but was brought back for additional debate once the new session began last week.

While I personally support the passage of such resolutions, I do find the amended S424, as passed, to be a lot more rhetoric than substance.

Rather than a simply-worded document outlining the principles of delegated and retained powers that the 10th stands for, it spends a lot of time doing what I feel is grandstanding in opposition to federal health care mandates. If the South Carolina wants to pass a law protecting free choice in health care, they should take a look at resolutions and bills around the country doing just that (including 2 in the S.C. House)

If this was really a non-partisan issue, South Carolina should have passed this resolution when the Bush administration was expanding government run health care more than anyone in decades.

On the other hand, there is some very good language in the resolution too.  For example:

Whereas, the federal government has spent trillions of dollars of borrowed money to run deficits, to bail out financial institutions, to prop-up auto makers, and to keep afloat other private enterprises that were mismanaged, took unnecessary risks, or were unresponsive to market demands, thus amassing a debt that will loom over and burden our country for generations to come

While I’m excited and supportive of passing 10th Amendment Resolutions, I feel that the language of S424 is far too partisan to have any long-term effect.

CLICK HERE to view the Tenth Amendment Center’s 10th amendment resolution tracking page

CLICK HERE to view the Tenth Amendment Center’s model 10th Amendment Resolution, which you can send to your representatives when urging them to introduce one in your state.

2

South Carolina to Consider Health Care Nullification

57340762South Carolina State Representatives Duncan, Long and Wylie have House Joint Resolution 4240 (HJR4240), which proposes a South Carolina State Constitutional Amendment stating that “No law may be enacted that restricts an individual’s freedom of choice of private health care systems or private health insurance plans of any type. No law may be enacted that interferes with an individual’s or entity’s right to pay directly for lawful medical services. No law may be enacted imposing a penalty or fine, of any type, for choosing to obtain or decline health care coverage or for participation in any particular health care system or plan.”

If approved by both houses of the South Carolina legislature, it will go to a ballot vote for final approval by the citizens of the state.

South Carolina joins Georgia, Ohio, Florida and a number of other states considering similar state Constitutional Amendments to effectively nullify, or resist any future national health care plan.

New Hampshire recently introduced a bill to make law that not only makes federal restrictions of health care choices illegal in the state, but also expressly prohibits interference in these choices by federal agents and requires state agencies to interpose as a protection.
Click here to learn more.

CLICK HERE to see the Tenth Amendment Center’s Health Care Nullification Tracking Page

4