INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (Jan 18, 2021) – A bill introduced in the Indiana Senate would prohibit “no-knock” warrants and take a step toward nullifying several Supreme Court opinions in practice and effect.
Sen. Eddie Melton (D) introduced Senate Bill 269 (SB269) on Jan. 11. The legislation would prohibit police from seeking, executing, or participating in the execution of a search warrant that does not require the persons executing the warrant to knock and announce themselves and their purpose. The bill also specifies three steps police must take when executing a warrant.
(A) physically knock on an entry door to the premises in a manner and for a period of time that the knocking can be heard by the occupants;
(B) clearly announce in a manner that can be heard by the occupants that law enforcement is executing a search warrant; and
(C) wait for a reasonable amount of time for occupants to respond, but at least for ten (10)seconds, before entering the premises.
Nullifying the Supreme Court
Passage of SB269 would take a big step toward effectively nullifying and making irrelevant several Supreme Court opinions that give police across the U.S. legal cover for conducting no-knock raids.
In the 1995 case Wilson v. Arkansas, the Supreme Court established that police must peacefully knock, announce their presence, and allow time for the occupants to open the door before entering a home to serve a warrant. But the Court allowed for “exigent circumstance” exceptions if police fear violence, if the suspect is a flight risk, or if officers fear the suspect will destroy evidence.
As journalist Radley Balko notes, police utilized this exception to the fullest extent, “simply declaring in search warrant affidavits that all drug dealers are a threat to dispose of evidence, flee or assault the officers at the door.”
The SCOTUS eliminated this blanket exception in Richards v. Wisconsin (1997) requiring police to show why a specific individual is a threat to dispose of evidence, commit an act of violence or flee from police. But even with the opinion, the bar for obtaining a no-knock warrant remains low.
“In order to justify a ‘no-knock’ entry, the police must have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence, under the particular circumstances, would be dangerous or futile, or that it would inhibit the effective investigation of the crime by, for example, allowing the destruction of evidence.” [Emphasis added]
Reasonable suspicion is an extremely low legal bar to meet. Through this exception, police can justify no-knock entry on any warrant application. In effect, the parameters in the SCOTUS ruling make no-knock the norm instead of the exception.
A third Supreme Court ruling effectively eliminated the consequences for violating the “knock and announce” requirement even without a no-knock warrant. In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the High Court held that evidence seized in violation of knock and announce was not subject to the exclusionary rule. In other words, police could still use the evidence in court even though they technically gathered it illegally.
Significantly, were it not for the dubious “incorporation doctrine” made up by the Supreme Crout based on the 14th Amendment that purportedly empowers the federal government to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, these cases would have never gone to federal court and we wouldn’t have these blanket rules.
Without specific restrictions from the state, police officers generally operate within the parameters set by the High Court. By passing restrictions on no-knock warrants, states set standards that go beyond the Supreme Court limits and in effect, nullify the SCOTUS opinion.
SB269 was referred to the Senate Corrections & Criminal Law Committee where it must pass by a majority vote before moving forward in the legislative process.
- This Is a Huge Problem - February 24, 2021
- South Dakota House Committee Passes Bill to Create Process to Review and Reject Presidential Executive Orders - February 24, 2021
- To the Governor: Utah Passes Bill to Further Limit Warrantless Collection of Electronic Data - February 24, 2021