<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Victory for the States</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/another-victory-for-the-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/another-victory-for-the-states/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: grumpygresh</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/another-victory-for-the-states/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpygresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=654#comment-646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The states clearly have jurisdiction here. Whether it be marijuana, same sex marriage, ID, or health care insurance, the states are sovereign. The federal government has enumerated powers and individuals have the bill of rights/amendments which supersede the federal and state government.  
However, it is clear that if the federal government can compel specified commercial activity by its citizens, the US Constitution will be transformed into an instrument of tyranny.  
The only practice way to fight this now is on the state level through legislation, state amendments, action by governors and AGs. Combined with the election of a constitutionally minded Republican president in 2012, the health care legislation can be effectively neutered.  
If a politician does not support the Constitution and will not fight to rescind the mandates, I have no use for them. And at this point in time, ALL Democrats and many Republicans (but not all) fit this description.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The states clearly have jurisdiction here. Whether it be marijuana, same sex marriage, ID, or health care insurance, the states are sovereign. The federal government has enumerated powers and individuals have the bill of rights/amendments which supersede the federal and state government.<br />
However, it is clear that if the federal government can compel specified commercial activity by its citizens, the US Constitution will be transformed into an instrument of tyranny.<br />
The only practice way to fight this now is on the state level through legislation, state amendments, action by governors and AGs. Combined with the election of a constitutionally minded Republican president in 2012, the health care legislation can be effectively neutered.<br />
If a politician does not support the Constitution and will not fight to rescind the mandates, I have no use for them. And at this point in time, ALL Democrats and many Republicans (but not all) fit this description.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/another-victory-for-the-states/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=654#comment-645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emma - I agree with you on the principle that you should have the liberty to do this if you want.  

But - you&#039;re missing the point. 

The BEST way to ensure that your liberty has a chance to thrive and grow - is to keep decisions like this closer to home.  On a state level is a far better place than a national one.

Now - if you believe that your state should get out of your affairs - what are YOU doing in your state to work to make that happen?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emma &#8211; I agree with you on the principle that you should have the liberty to do this if you want.  </p>
<p>But &#8211; you&#8217;re missing the point. </p>
<p>The BEST way to ensure that your liberty has a chance to thrive and grow &#8211; is to keep decisions like this closer to home.  On a state level is a far better place than a national one.</p>
<p>Now &#8211; if you believe that your state should get out of your affairs &#8211; what are YOU doing in your state to work to make that happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/another-victory-for-the-states/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=654#comment-644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Reddit by kpw1179: Regardless of your personal view of Marijuana use, this news should make us all feel a little more free today, knowing that decisions about such things as owning a particular plant are once again in the han...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Reddit by kpw1179: Regardless of your personal view of Marijuana use, this news should make us all feel a little more free today, knowing that decisions about such things as owning a particular plant are once again in the han&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/another-victory-for-the-states/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=654#comment-643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take it a few steps further and I&#039;ll be on board. 

Why should what *state* I&#039;m in have any bearing on whether I can grow and smoke a plant alone and in the privacy of my own home?

It shouldn&#039;t. Let&#039;s keep the government out of my greenery entirely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it a few steps further and I&#8217;ll be on board. </p>
<p>Why should what *state* I&#8217;m in have any bearing on whether I can grow and smoke a plant alone and in the privacy of my own home?</p>
<p>It shouldn&#8217;t. Let&#8217;s keep the government out of my greenery entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Another Victory for the States &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/another-victory-for-the-states/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Another Victory for the States &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=654#comment-642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, CLHunting. CLHunting said: RT @TenthAmendment: 10th Amendment movement doesn&#039;t wait 4 approval from Federal lawmakers or courts-it doesn&#039;t need 2 http://bit.ly/2IRdWK [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, CLHunting. CLHunting said: RT @TenthAmendment: 10th Amendment movement doesn&#039;t wait 4 approval from Federal lawmakers or courts-it doesn&#039;t need 2 <a href="http://bit.ly/2IRdWK" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2IRdWK</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
