<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tenth Amendment and the Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:08:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Hand</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1058#comment-941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew: Agree on your points. I am also campaigning on challenging the Sixteenth Amendment since it does not specify the limits of taxation the feds can extract directly from citizens and corporations. I am going to ask the voters of Colorado to limit the rate to 18% maximum in our state constitution and let the challenge begin. 
 
First I must get elected... 
 
Rich Hand  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: Agree on your points. I am also campaigning on challenging the Sixteenth Amendment since it does not specify the limits of taxation the feds can extract directly from citizens and corporations. I am going to ask the voters of Colorado to limit the rate to 18% maximum in our state constitution and let the challenge begin. </p>
<p>First I must get elected&#8230; </p>
<p>Rich Hand  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Nappi</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nappi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1058#comment-940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not an attorney or an &quot;educated&quot; person. It seems to me though if we are to restore limited lawful government, the 10th amendment will need to be supported by repeal of the 17th. When the state legislature chooses a senator, he or she will be doing the state&#039;s work and not the &quot;peoples&quot; in the broaders sense. The states will once again influence the choice of Justices, something lost with the popular election of senators. If we are successful with moving the tenth forward I believe we can repeal the 17th as we elect more constitutionalists to office. A side effect may just be the death of the two major parties, not a bad thing. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not an attorney or an &quot;educated&quot; person. It seems to me though if we are to restore limited lawful government, the 10th amendment will need to be supported by repeal of the 17th. When the state legislature chooses a senator, he or she will be doing the state&#039;s work and not the &quot;peoples&quot; in the broaders sense. The states will once again influence the choice of Justices, something lost with the popular election of senators. If we are successful with moving the tenth forward I believe we can repeal the 17th as we elect more constitutionalists to office. A side effect may just be the death of the two major parties, not a bad thing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1058#comment-939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by DistantVision: The Tenth Amendment and the Supreme Court - As the Tenth Amendment becomes the platform to stop an over reaching fe... http://ow.ly/16178U...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by DistantVision: The Tenth Amendment and the Supreme Court &#8211; As the Tenth Amendment becomes the platform to stop an over reaching fe&#8230; <a href="http://ow.ly/16178U" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/16178U</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Tenth Amendment and the Supreme Court &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Tenth Amendment and the Supreme Court &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1058#comment-938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, A Distant Vision. A Distant Vision said: The Tenth Amendment and the Supreme Court - As the Tenth Amendment becomes the platform to stop an over reaching fe... http://ow.ly/16178U [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, A Distant Vision. A Distant Vision said: The Tenth Amendment and the Supreme Court &#8211; As the Tenth Amendment becomes the platform to stop an over reaching fe&#8230; <a href="http://ow.ly/16178U" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/16178U</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McDaniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McDaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1058#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You made me cut much of it off, surely your website can hqandle more words.  If you do not make or alloe a full discussion, all you will have is a bunch of people sending nonsense and junk ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made me cut much of it off, surely your website can hqandle more words.  If you do not make or alloe a full discussion, all you will have is a bunch of people sending nonsense and junk </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McDaniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/the-tenth-amendment-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McDaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1058#comment-936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have practiced law for years, I have raised the same question several times- the federal government has exceeded its power and control amongst the sewveral states.  With the beginning of proibition, the growth of such new federal agencies began- DEA, FBI and ATF- there were many reasons in favor of such agencies.  The mobs were well organized and financed to take over the manufacture, distribution and control of the alcholic beverage business.  The FEDs only were to have jurisdiction in cASES INVOLVING iNTERSTATE COMMERCE-SELLING PRODUCTS ACROSS STATE  lines.  Remember- prohibition was enacted by reason of a constitutional amendment.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have practiced law for years, I have raised the same question several times- the federal government has exceeded its power and control amongst the sewveral states.  With the beginning of proibition, the growth of such new federal agencies began- DEA, FBI and ATF- there were many reasons in favor of such agencies.  The mobs were well organized and financed to take over the manufacture, distribution and control of the alcholic beverage business.  The FEDs only were to have jurisdiction in cASES INVOLVING iNTERSTATE COMMERCE-SELLING PRODUCTS ACROSS STATE  lines.  Remember- prohibition was enacted by reason of a constitutional amendment.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
