<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: States&#8217; Rights Republicans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:03:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monorprise</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>Monorprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1459#comment-1251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll take what ever I can get when ever I can get it.  Maybe they are doing it just while the Democrats are in Washington, but the fact is they are doing it and we can uses it to advance our cause. 
 
 
I seem to remember a similar hypocritical fight between the federalist and the anti federalist 200 years ago, why not have anther one.  As I said before, Washington politicians whether they call themselves, Democrats or Republicans are not going to help us in this cause simply because it is a basic conflict of interest for them. 
&#039; 
The very best we can do is be sure to elect people to Washington who will for whatever reason not appose the acts of our States, whether the reason be incompetence, values, or political promises we hold them to. 
 
To expect more form the Federal politicians is to: 
 
1: Require the power corrupted majority we will not get much less maintain because of the same corrupting effects of power. 
 
2: Somewhat missing the long term goal of maintaining the power ballade AGAINST the inevitable ongoing assault by the power mongering politicians on both sides.  In short if our states are not strong enough to fight this battle and hold the line on their own(which includes pushing back when the feds go too far) then the ballade will not be maintained. 
 
So the States not Washington have to be the ones that do this!  Because their the only one&#8217;s who&#8217;s natural human/politician nature interest will drive them to hold the line in favor of the states over the long run.  Precedence is very important here! 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll take what ever I can get when ever I can get it.  Maybe they are doing it just while the Democrats are in Washington, but the fact is they are doing it and we can uses it to advance our cause. </p>
<p>I seem to remember a similar hypocritical fight between the federalist and the anti federalist 200 years ago, why not have anther one.  As I said before, Washington politicians whether they call themselves, Democrats or Republicans are not going to help us in this cause simply because it is a basic conflict of interest for them.<br />
&#039;<br />
The very best we can do is be sure to elect people to Washington who will for whatever reason not appose the acts of our States, whether the reason be incompetence, values, or political promises we hold them to. </p>
<p>To expect more form the Federal politicians is to: </p>
<p>1: Require the power corrupted majority we will not get much less maintain because of the same corrupting effects of power. </p>
<p>2: Somewhat missing the long term goal of maintaining the power ballade AGAINST the inevitable ongoing assault by the power mongering politicians on both sides.  In short if our states are not strong enough to fight this battle and hold the line on their own(which includes pushing back when the feds go too far) then the ballade will not be maintained. </p>
<p>So the States not Washington have to be the ones that do this!  Because their the only one&rsquo;s who&rsquo;s natural human/politician nature interest will drive them to hold the line in favor of the states over the long run.  Precedence is very important here! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Barham</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1459#comment-1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new WPA for 2009 is a chain gang solution to joblessness. Obama said: the interests of community are more important than are the interests of the individual. He promised change. Change must then mean to abandon individual freedom. The chain gang is one way to do so.  You can call his ideas left, socialist, communist, fascist, monarchist or any others that turn you on, but in reality, there are only two different political forms. The oldest is where the few elite rule the many, part of all those labels. They have always favored a chain gang. The newest is where the many rule themselves, guided by a moral consensus and written law, i.e., individual freedom.  Conservatives and libertarians say the interests of individuals are more important than are those of the community. They believe when individuals prosper, their families and communities prosper and government works best staying out of their way. Modern Democrats believe community interests are most important. They claim they can better define and govern community interests. They expand the role of government to serve those interests and as a few elite, will rule the many. This is the center of Obama&#8217;s chain gang.  Claysamerica.com ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new WPA for 2009 is a chain gang solution to joblessness. Obama said: the interests of community are more important than are the interests of the individual. He promised change. Change must then mean to abandon individual freedom. The chain gang is one way to do so.  You can call his ideas left, socialist, communist, fascist, monarchist or any others that turn you on, but in reality, there are only two different political forms. The oldest is where the few elite rule the many, part of all those labels. They have always favored a chain gang. The newest is where the many rule themselves, guided by a moral consensus and written law, i.e., individual freedom.  Conservatives and libertarians say the interests of individuals are more important than are those of the community. They believe when individuals prosper, their families and communities prosper and government works best staying out of their way. Modern Democrats believe community interests are most important. They claim they can better define and govern community interests. They expand the role of government to serve those interests and as a few elite, will rule the many. This is the center of Obama&rsquo;s chain gang.  Claysamerica.com </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: States’ Rights Republicans?&#160;&#124;&#160;Florida Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>States’ Rights Republicans?&#160;&#124;&#160;Florida Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1459#comment-1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 02. Dec, 2009  Written by: Josh Eboch Comments (3) [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 02. Dec, 2009  Written by: Josh Eboch Comments (3) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Krey</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Krey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1459#comment-1248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never trust Republicans.... NEVER! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never trust Republicans&#8230;. NEVER! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshuaLyons</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshuaLyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1459#comment-1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Josh - as always...right on target! Keep an eye out for my next blog post. Mark Kreslins and I will be rolling out some steps on the radio show this Saturday that fall in line with your theme above. 
-Joshua 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forgottenmen.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.forgottenmen.com&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh &#8211; as always&#8230;right on target! Keep an eye out for my next blog post. Mark Kreslins and I will be rolling out some steps on the radio show this Saturday that fall in line with your theme above.<br />
-Joshua<br />
<a href="http://www.forgottenmen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.forgottenmen.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention States’ Rights Republicans? &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/states-rights-republicans/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention States’ Rights Republicans? &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1459#comment-1246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter and ohiofreedom, A Distant Vision. A Distant Vision said: States&#039; Rights Republicans? - It looks like some members of the Republican establishment are starting to fear prima... http://ow.ly/1660Wt [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter and ohiofreedom, A Distant Vision. A Distant Vision said: States&#039; Rights Republicans? &#8211; It looks like some members of the Republican establishment are starting to fear prima&#8230; <a href="http://ow.ly/1660Wt" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1660Wt</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
