Comments on: Arizona, South Dakota: A Chance to Advance the Nullification Movement http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/11/arizona-south-dakota-a-change-to-advance-the-nullification-movement/ The Tenther Grapevine Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:59:28 +0000 hourly 1 By: Philosopherking http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/11/arizona-south-dakota-a-change-to-advance-the-nullification-movement/#comment-3474 Philosopherking Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:01:00 +0000 http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5585#comment-3474 I'm pretty sure it is OK with my state's own constitution either way. Also, most local cities and municipalities can still make it illegal on their own streets, assuming they ain't barred from it in the state's own constittuion.

I think that is the way to go with drug legalization. Make it legal on the federal and state level and leave it up to individual cities if they want to legalize it or not. Cities that want to do drugs can do so while cities that don't can still do so.

It actually might make drug enforcement easier in cities that want to illegalize drugs because all the drug users will live in another city thus no drug users will be left who will violate their laws.

]]> By: MichaelBoldin http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/11/arizona-south-dakota-a-change-to-advance-the-nullification-movement/#comment-3473 MichaelBoldin Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:16:50 +0000 http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5585#comment-3473 more importantly, how does a yes or a no vote coincide with the Constitution?

]]> By: Philosopherking http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/11/arizona-south-dakota-a-change-to-advance-the-nullification-movement/#comment-3472 Philosopherking Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:24:25 +0000 http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5585#comment-3472 "Ask yourself if you still qualify as a human being."

I voted no and I'm pretty sure I still qualify as a human being. I'm not buying into this 'medical marijana' stuff because people pushing this are being deceptive. Its no secret that these groups do dope in their spare time which are different than the people who wanted to repeal prohibition. If they just came out and said "I think it should be legal for me to do dope" I would have respected that argument and voted yes but they all pull this deceptive garbage of saying its for cancer patients.

Why not deregulate the use of existing drugs for doctors. I believe that most doctors are prohibited by the fed government to proscribe legal drugs longer than a certain period. This results in handcuffing doctors from using their own judgement for someone who has no hope of living. Now why wouldn't these groups push for that as much as they push for dope?

]]> By: Tweets that mention Arizona, South Dakota: A Change to Advance the Nullification Movement – Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/11/arizona-south-dakota-a-change-to-advance-the-nullification-movement/#comment-3471 Tweets that mention Arizona, South Dakota: A Change to Advance the Nullification Movement – Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:05:55 +0000 http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5585#comment-3471 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by A Distant Vision, Nancy J. Iorio. Nancy J. Iorio said: Arizona, South Dakota: A Change to Advance the Nullification …: On Election Day, Arizona and South Dakota will v… http://bit.ly/btiIn0 [...]

]]>