“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding”.

Maybe the North Dakota Attorney General had a point.

I was born in Wahpton and lived in Dwight, North Dakota. I have relatives all over the state and in Minnesota. I hope no harm come to anyone due to the Floods.

I was born in Wahpeton and lived in Dwight, North Dakota. I have relatives all over the state and in Minnesota. I hope no harm come to anyone due to the Floods.

I am not sure if you are from North Dakota or any state that has been hit by a natural disaster. If you are, I am sure there are plenty of taxpayers from other states who do not want to pay for natural disaster damages with their taxes. Why should they. It's the states problem, so let them fix it. Right? Tell FEMA to save the cost of the trailers and supplies they give to disaster victims and discontinue all financial assistance from the Federal Government. Why should taxpayers from other states have to spend their tax dollars to help some other US Citizen when they had nothing to do with it and it didn't affect them? That way we can use the money to pay down the deficit. That should make Merrill happy.

However, since the ultimate goal is to bankrupt the country, it makes no difference whether the states follow/enforce the federal law or not. The idea is for the federal government to spend the money. Getting something for it is totally irrelevant. Just take a look at all the foolish "programs" that have been instituted by the federal government over the past 100 years. None of them are designed to be affective in any way, other than to spend us into unsustainable debt.

This has absolutely nothing to do with one party or the other. If you look at them both, other than finding social points over which to argue, there is very little difference. That's because they all belong to the same controlling institution, which is the CFR. This is no conspiracy theory. It's all proven fact and mostly by direct admission from the CFR itself. The theory part has been out for years. We're being enslaved by both Democrats and Republicans. If you doubt that for a minute, just take a look at GWB's record and compare it to Obama. The only difference is volume, but the beat is the same.