<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jan Brewer: Extremely Disappointing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/jan-brewer-extremely-disappointing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/jan-brewer-extremely-disappointing/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:03:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FL10thAmendment</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/jan-brewer-extremely-disappointing/#comment-12419</link>
		<dc:creator>FL10thAmendment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12430#comment-12419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To Governor Brewer, and all  Governors who may want to find cover in a conflicting allegiance  position. We are by design a dual sovereignty Republic. I would submit  to such a stance, on the surface so righteous, but upon examination,  most hollow-these sentiments from Connecticut&#039;s Oliver Ellsworth:  “The  U.S. are sovereign on their side of the line dividing  jurisdictions---the States on the other---each ought to have the power  to defend their respective jurisdictions” I would also offer as further  example that Governor Brewer&#039;s reasoning is flawed and is certainly not  uncharted territory, another response from Connecticut, this time it&#039;s  legislature  explaining why it refused its Militia for service in The  War of 1812-  &quot;But it must not be forgotten, that the State of  Connecticut is a FREE SOVEREIGN and INDEPENDENT State; that the United  States are a confederacy of States; that we are a confederated and not a  consolidated Republic. The Governor of this State is under a high and  solemn obligation, &quot;to maintain the lawful rights and privileges  thereof, as a sovereign, free and independent State,&quot; as he is &quot;to  support the Constitution of   the United States,&quot; and the obligation to support the latter imposes an   additional obligation to support the former. The building cannot stand,  if the pillars upon which it rests, are impaired or destroyed.&quot;  A  Governor cannot claim allegiance to a republic of our design without  allegiance first to his own state, the very creator of the general  government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Governor Brewer, and all  Governors who may want to find cover in a conflicting allegiance  position. We are by design a dual sovereignty Republic. I would submit  to such a stance, on the surface so righteous, but upon examination,  most hollow-these sentiments from Connecticut&#8217;s Oliver Ellsworth:  “The  U.S. are sovereign on their side of the line dividing  jurisdictions&#8212;the States on the other&#8212;each ought to have the power  to defend their respective jurisdictions” I would also offer as further  example that Governor Brewer&#8217;s reasoning is flawed and is certainly not  uncharted territory, another response from Connecticut, this time it&#8217;s  legislature  explaining why it refused its Militia for service in The  War of 1812-  &#8220;But it must not be forgotten, that the State of  Connecticut is a FREE SOVEREIGN and INDEPENDENT State; that the United  States are a confederacy of States; that we are a confederated and not a  consolidated Republic. The Governor of this State is under a high and  solemn obligation, &#8220;to maintain the lawful rights and privileges  thereof, as a sovereign, free and independent State,&#8221; as he is &#8220;to  support the Constitution of   the United States,&#8221; and the obligation to support the latter imposes an   additional obligation to support the former. The building cannot stand,  if the pillars upon which it rests, are impaired or destroyed.&#8221;  A  Governor cannot claim allegiance to a republic of our design without  allegiance first to his own state, the very creator of the general  government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
