Should We Obey All Laws?

by Walter Williams

Let’s think about whether all acts of Congress deserve our respect and obedience. Suppose Congress enacted a law – and the Supreme Court ruled it constitutional – requiring American families to attend church services at least three times a month. Should we obey such a law? Suppose Congress, acting under the Constitution’s commerce clause, enacted a law requiring motorists to get eight hours of sleep before driving on interstate highways. Its justification might be that drowsy motorists risk highway accidents and accidents affect interstate commerce. Suppose you were a jury member during the 1850s and a free person were on trial for assisting a runaway slave, in clear violation of the Fugitive Slave Act. Would you vote to convict and punish?

A moral person would find each one of those laws either morally repugnant or to be a clear violation of our Constitution. You say, “Williams, you’re wrong this time. In 1859, in Ableman v. Booth, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 constitutional.” That court decision, as well as some others in our past, makes my case. Moral people can’t rely solely on the courts to establish what’s right or wrong. Slavery is immoral; therefore, any laws that support slavery are also immoral. In the words of Thomas Jefferson, “to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions (is) a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Soon, the Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of Obamacare, euphemistically titled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. There is absolutely no constitutional authority for Congress to force any American to enter into a contract to buy any good or service. But if the court rules that Obamacare is constitutional, what should we do?

State governors and legislators ought to summon up the courage of our Founding Fathers in response to the 5th Congress’ Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. Led by Jefferson and James Madison, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798 and 1799 were drafted where legislatures took the position that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional. They said, “Resolved, That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government … (and) whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force.” The 10th Amendment to our Constitution supports that vision: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

In a word, if the Supreme Court rules that Obamacare is constitutional, citizens should press their state governors and legislatures to nullify the law. You say, “Williams, the last time states got into this nullification business, it led to a war that cost 600,000 lives.” Two things are different this time. First, most Americans are against Obamacare, and secondly, I don’t believe that you could find a U.S. soldier who would follow a presidential order to descend on a state to round up or shoot down fellow Americans because they refuse to follow a congressional order to buy health insurance.

Congress has already gone far beyond the powers delegated to it by the Constitution. In Federalist No. 45, Madison explained: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.” That vision has been turned on its head; it’s the federal government whose powers are numerous and indefinite, and those of the state are now few and defined.

Former slave Frederick Douglass advised: “Find out just what people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them. … The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”

Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics at George Mason University, and a nationally syndicated columnist. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page.

Copyright © 2012 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
6 comments
AldenWayneDumas
AldenWayneDumas

 “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.” That vision has been turned on its head; it’s the federal government whose powers are numerous and indefinite, and those of the state are now few and defined.

It's not to late to take America back, Vote Ron Paul in 2012......

armadascraper
armadascraper

While I agree with the premise of the article, I must ask, why the hell am I obligated to participate in the Social Security system!?!?  Why am I required to pay for the asinine, empire-building, foreign wars? Why, I the name of holy Jesus, must I continue to be a part of the inflationary, debt-created, idiotic Federal Reserve system? This ideas presented in this article are true, but why doesn't anybody live by them?

DaleGraessle
DaleGraessle like.author.displayName 1 Like

Williams is certainly right here. As with slavery laws, don't be a reformer. BE AN ABOLITIONIST!

rcfjr
rcfjr like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

The OBAMA Care issue is small change to what the Government has done to the American people. The replacement of all elected officials is in order. Throw out the Constitution of "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (inc)" and put back in place the Constitution of "The United States for America". The Constitution that was take illegally from us in 1871.

seektruth101
seektruth101

While it may be true that they'd be hard pressed to find an American soldier who will fire on citizens, there are plenty of thugs and foreign troops that would gladly step up to the task.

 

Obama is prepping for martial law.

big_bear
big_bear like.author.displayName 1 Like

You said..." Suppose Congress, acting under the Constitution’s commerce clause, enacted a law requiring motorists to get eight hours of sleep before driving on interstate highways. Its justification might be that drowsy motorists risk highway accidents and accidents affect interstate commerce." Well, I hate to break it to you, but the US Department of Transportation has already done this to commercial truck and bus drivers. We are required by "rule" not "law" to take a mandatory 10 consecutive hours off duty before driving. We also can not drive after being on duty 70 hours in 8 days or 60 hours in 7 days. They're also trying to push through a mandatory 30 minute break after being on duty (driving or not) 7 consecutive hours. Now tell me where that falls in line please. I've been arguing for years that it's bogus. Bureaucrats think they know best when "I" am tired, when "I" need to take a break. They think we as an industry are to darn stupid to know when to sleep.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Should We Obey All Laws? – Tenth Amendment Center Blog. Share this:PrintEmailDiggShare on Tumblr Pin ItLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Constitution, Economics, Politics and tagged Current Events, ObamaCare, Politics, Taxes, Tenth Amendment. Bookmark the permalink. ← Voter Fraud doesn’t happen very often – BALONEY! [...]