No ‘Freedom Option’ in the Revised Senate Health Care Bill
I hear it all the time, especially from my conservative friends.
The bluster.
The defiance.
The tough-guy edicts.
“They’ll never take my guns!” they declare. “Not unless they pry them out of my cold dead hands.”
But I think Jim Karger got it right in a July 31 column published over at Lew Rockwell.
“And, when I hear this crazy talk, I agree with them openly. ‘You are right. They will pry your gun from your cold dead hands,’ which I often follow with the question, ‘And where will that leave you except face down in a pool of your own blood in the middle of the street, just another dead fool resisting the State?’”
Let’s be brutally honest. If a SWAT team comes rolling down your street demanding your guns, you will either meekly give them up, or you will end up a bloody corpse. Even the well-armed civilian will not win a gun battle with police armed with military style weapons, top-grade body armor and riding in virtual tanks.
And every day, the police in America become more and more militarized, as Karger points out.
“The militarization of US police forces is ongoing and escalating. Many cities and towns now own tanks, armed personnel carriers, even attack helicopters, and almost all are outfitted with military weapons not available to the general public.”
Not to mention the fact that we also have evidence that the military continues to train and procure weapons “necessary for use by the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities” under section 1815 of the FY 2008 NDAA.” (Emphasis added.)
So you are going to take them on with your AR-15. Good luck with that. It’s like the old joke about the guy bringing a knife to a gun-fight. Knife guy loses.
Bottom line – we won’t stop the DC’vers with brute force.
But we can stop federal overreach in its tracks through nullification and interposition at the state and local level. By harnessing the power of the political system in our states, we can begin to rein in federal overreach.
For instance, consider Virginia’s response to detention provisions in the NDAA. By law, officials in the Old Dominion State will not cooperate with federal officials seeking to detain Virginia citizens without due process. Now imagine the impact if other states followed suit. It would become very difficult for the feds to carry out any actual detention.
Doubt me? Look at how effective state resistance to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was. As northern states adopted personal liberty laws, the number of blacks dragged back south fell to nearly zero.
And look at the success of medical marijuana programs in 17 states. Oh sure, the feds push back from time to time, but by and large, these states successfully thumb their noses at the federal prohibition of medicinal cannabis.
We can also take steps at the local level, electing and educating sheriffs who take their oath the “preserve and protect the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic” seriously. If we have local law enforcement on our side, it strengthens our position.
It’s amusing to me that many of the same people who claim they will shoot it out with anybody coming to take their guns will protest that nullification will “never work.”
The truth is we have the ability to build a platform of strength and unity through the political mechanisms at the state and local level. Real power – not just some bluster about shooting up the feds with our rifles. Jefferson called nullification “the rightful remedy” and I believe he’s absolutely correct. Ultimately, power flows from the people.
But the people must engage. It will take a lot of work. State and local politicians are no more reliable than their cohorts in D.C. We just have a better chance of exerting influence over them. We have more access and more sway over state and local lawmakers, but we seldom chose to exercise it.
Forgotten Men radio host Mark Kreslins sums it up perfectly.
“It’s easy to ‘talk’ when there is no real threat right now. But when the so-called federal government attempts to disarm the public, most everyone will comply. Why? Because we’re not courageous enough during this peaceful interlude to discuss real solutions while we can still do so.”
So let’s show a little courage and get to work!
NEXT STEPS
Mike Maharrey
Michael Maharrey [send him email] is the Communications Director for the Tenth Amendment Center.He proudly resides in the original home of the Principles of '98 - Kentucky.See his blog archive here and his article archive here.He is the author of the book, Our Last Hope: Rediscovering the Lost Path to Liberty. You can visit his personal website at MichaelMaharrey.com and like him on Facebook HERE
Latest posts by Mike Maharrey (see all)
- A Lesson in Strategy: William Lloyd Garrison - September 22, 2017
- Activism 101 Podcast #16: What Do I Do When My Event Flops? - September 20, 2017
- Radio Interview: Addressing Surveillance at the Local Level - September 19, 2017
Yes, resisting alone is foolish. But that’s not what has the feddies scared. It’s neighborhoods, clubs, friends, church groups, getting together and standing up to tyranny, as one force. No SWAT team is going to run over a crowd of armed citizens unless they want to instigate a true insurrection, like what’s happening in Syria. And blithely shooting up your own citizenry will invite “foreign powers” to intervene, for the “rebels/protestors/etc.” sake. Trust me, they’re itching to do so after the years of American intervention worldwide. So if an unConstitutional “disarmament” happens, grab your neighbors/friends/coworkers/family/enemies/whoever is armed and roadblock your neighborhood. With 25, 50, 100 fully armed citizens staring them down, the cowards will back off. Remember, the police are concerned primarily with “officer safety” nowadays — they won’t even take on a lone armed wacko. They just cordon off the area and wait until the damage is done, then rush in all heroic-like to find they are, as usual, too late to the party to be helpful. You really think these guys/gals who, when fully armed to the teeth, won’t even confront a lone gunman, will engage in a protracted firefight with an overwhelming number of well-armed citizens? Won’t happen. Especially when they look in the crowd and see their friends, neighbors, and family aiming at their heart.
Sadly, my post is the same color as the background – so I am unable to participate. If a solution appears, I shall try again.
I don’t think it’s “either or”… it’s both. We need to politically engage while we can, AND prepare to go down fighting if necessary.
A SWAT team isn’t going to suddenly show up to take your guns without you knowing it. It’s not going to be a big surprise. If you’re surprised, then you’re likely not going to have been engaged politically anyway.
So for those of us paying attention, it’s my humble opinion that we engage politically and arm ourselves to the teeth… do both while you can.