<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Name Calling and &#8220;Tenther Nullification Nonsense&#8221; in Arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/08/name-calling-and-tenther-nullification-nonsense-in-arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/08/name-calling-and-tenther-nullification-nonsense-in-arizona/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheEagleKeeper</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/08/name-calling-and-tenther-nullification-nonsense-in-arizona/#comment-17043</link>
		<dc:creator>TheEagleKeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12997#comment-17043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @Anne_Ominous Thank you Anne for your comments. After I had read through them, I went back and  reviewed my post to isolate what you were referring to and I now see your point.
 
You are absolutely correct in asserting that my personnel thoughts and ramblings had no place in the article. I concur the comments were misplaced and did not serve to advance the points I was attempting to relay.
 
Thanks for bringing that up!
 
Lou
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @Anne_Ominous Thank you Anne for your comments. After I had read through them, I went back and  reviewed my post to isolate what you were referring to and I now see your point.<br />
 <br />
You are absolutely correct in asserting that my personnel thoughts and ramblings had no place in the article. I concur the comments were misplaced and did not serve to advance the points I was attempting to relay.<br />
 <br />
Thanks for bringing that up!<br />
 <br />
Lou<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onetenther</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/08/name-calling-and-tenther-nullification-nonsense-in-arizona/#comment-16856</link>
		<dc:creator>onetenther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 01:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12997#comment-16856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The oath actually is a pledge to uphold the constitution of the United States, constitution of the state of Arizona, and all laws of the state of Arizona.  I didn&#039;t read any part about upholding any federal laws.  This blue dude&#039;s argument is kind of invalid from the beginning. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oath actually is a pledge to uphold the constitution of the United States, constitution of the state of Arizona, and all laws of the state of Arizona.  I didn&#8217;t read any part about upholding any federal laws.  This blue dude&#8217;s argument is kind of invalid from the beginning. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne_Ominous</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/08/name-calling-and-tenther-nullification-nonsense-in-arizona/#comment-16855</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne_Ominous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12997#comment-16855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not putting down religion. But I would like to explain why I believe introducing it into your argument is a big mistake.
 
Throwing religion into the mix does 2 things:
 
First, it gives people the impression (correct or not) that you are  relying on faith rather than logic to put forth your argument. If you  are trying to make a logical or factual argument, then, your argument is  often weakened in the eyes of your audience, even if it is still  logically sound.
 
Second, it gives fuel to your opponents. Because now they can claim  (rightly or wrongly) that you are a &quot;right-wing religious nutcase&quot; and  so nobody should listen to the stuff that you spew.
 
So, to sum it up: I&#039;m not saying there is anything wrong with your  belief or your expression of it. But from the standpoint of STRATEGY, I  would thank you very much to stop spoon-feeding talking points and sound  bites to our opponents.
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not putting down religion. But I would like to explain why I believe introducing it into your argument is a big mistake.<br />
 <br />
Throwing religion into the mix does 2 things:<br />
 <br />
First, it gives people the impression (correct or not) that you are  relying on faith rather than logic to put forth your argument. If you  are trying to make a logical or factual argument, then, your argument is  often weakened in the eyes of your audience, even if it is still  logically sound.<br />
 <br />
Second, it gives fuel to your opponents. Because now they can claim  (rightly or wrongly) that you are a &#8220;right-wing religious nutcase&#8221; and  so nobody should listen to the stuff that you spew.<br />
 <br />
So, to sum it up: I&#8217;m not saying there is anything wrong with your  belief or your expression of it. But from the standpoint of STRATEGY, I  would thank you very much to stop spoon-feeding talking points and sound  bites to our opponents.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne_Ominous</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/08/name-calling-and-tenther-nullification-nonsense-in-arizona/#comment-16853</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne_Ominous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12997#comment-16853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a good summary of the nullification concept, but you weaken  it when you try to use religion to justify it. That was completely  unwarranted, unwanted, and unappreciated.
 
Take a lesson from Jefferson, and leave your religion at home.
 
Other than that, it was an excellent article.
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good summary of the nullification concept, but you weaken  it when you try to use religion to justify it. That was completely  unwarranted, unwanted, and unappreciated.<br />
 <br />
Take a lesson from Jefferson, and leave your religion at home.<br />
 <br />
Other than that, it was an excellent article.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
