Comments on: Florida voters get oppotunity to say ‘No!’ to federal insurance mandates

By: West Texan

West Texan — Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:45:14 +0000

“Opponents argue voters should reject the amendment because the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause trumps all state action.”

Allow me. Voters should welcome the measure because the Constitution’s tenth amendment trumps federal overreach via the supremacy clause.

By: West Texan

West Texan — Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:44:11 +0000

“Opponents argue voters should reject the amendment because the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause trumps all state action.”

Allow me. Said opponents should welcome the measure because the Constitution’s tenth amendment trumps federal overreach via the supremacy clause.

By: Geo51

Geo51 — Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:52:23 +0000

So the alternative is that anyone without insurance no longer get’s medical care?
You can’t have it both ways. Either you pay for coverage or you don’t have the right to care.
Otherwise, the taxpayer and the rest of us will always pay the bill for those to poor or lazy to get coverage.

By: States Enforcing The United States Constitution: Florida Moves To Nullify Obamacare & Supreme Court Justice Roberts! « Political Vel Craft

Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:00:24 +0000

[...] Tenth Amendment Center [...]

By: Florida voters get oppotunity to say ‘No!’ to federal insurance mandates « RubinoWorld

Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:30:45 +0000

[...] Posted by TAC Daily Updates via Tenth Amendment Center Blog [...]

By: bradc44

bradc44 — Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:26:15 +0000

It will be interesting to see how all this pans out. There is a good chance the states can manage the situation a little bit better.
http://www.ioausa.com