<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Electoral College: How to Defend?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/the-electoral-college-how-to-defend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/the-electoral-college-how-to-defend/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dmellon</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/the-electoral-college-how-to-defend/#comment-18038</link>
		<dc:creator>dmellon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13382#comment-18038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can defend the electoral college the same way our founders did.  James Madison in Federalist #10 explains why we have a federal system of government rather than a democracy.  He says in this famous paper that the primary reason is that in a federal system the rights of minorities are protected from the will of organized majorities intent on passing legislation injurious to the liberty of the  minority or detrimental to the good of the country.  
 
Here is a quote from #10, &quot;Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths&quot;. 
 
 An example of how the electoral college helps protect the rights of minorities can be seen in Ohio and West Virginia where coal miners, a small minority relative to the entire country, possibly have a considerable influence in the selection of the president.
 
Reducing our presidential vote to popularity only would mean all  electioneering would be done on the coasts and large cities and  interests of farmers and others living in the less populated areas of  the country would be ignored.  Is it not obvious this would further divide our country and soon lead to chaos?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can defend the electoral college the same way our founders did.  James Madison in Federalist #10 explains why we have a federal system of government rather than a democracy.  He says in this famous paper that the primary reason is that in a federal system the rights of minorities are protected from the will of organized majorities intent on passing legislation injurious to the liberty of the  minority or detrimental to the good of the country.  <br />
 <br />
Here is a quote from #10, &#8220;Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths&#8221;. <br />
 <br />
 An example of how the electoral college helps protect the rights of minorities can be seen in Ohio and West Virginia where coal miners, a small minority relative to the entire country, possibly have a considerable influence in the selection of the president.<br />
 <br />
Reducing our presidential vote to popularity only would mean all  electioneering would be done on the coasts and large cities and  interests of farmers and others living in the less populated areas of  the country would be ignored.  Is it not obvious this would further divide our country and soon lead to chaos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
