<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Muddled Thinking of a New York Times Intellectual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/12/the-muddled-thinking-of-a-new-york-times-intellectual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/12/the-muddled-thinking-of-a-new-york-times-intellectual/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:39:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Playing by the Rules &#124; Michael Maharrey</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/12/the-muddled-thinking-of-a-new-york-times-intellectual/#comment-21868</link>
		<dc:creator>Playing by the Rules &#124; Michael Maharrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14540#comment-21868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Yet some suggest Americans should just throw out that archaic, dusty Constitution and make things up as we go along. Take Georgetown University constitutional law professor Louis Michael Seidman. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yet some suggest Americans should just throw out that archaic, dusty Constitution and make things up as we go along. Take Georgetown University constitutional law professor Louis Michael Seidman. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honesty From A &#8220;Constitutional Scholar&#8221; Of The Left &#171; YouViewed/Editorial</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/12/the-muddled-thinking-of-a-new-york-times-intellectual/#comment-21178</link>
		<dc:creator>Honesty From A &#8220;Constitutional Scholar&#8221; Of The Left &#171; YouViewed/Editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14540#comment-21178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Muddled Thinking of a New York Times Intellectual (tenthamendmentcenter.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Muddled Thinking of a New York Times Intellectual (tenthamendmentcenter.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onetenther</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/12/the-muddled-thinking-of-a-new-york-times-intellectual/#comment-21174</link>
		<dc:creator>onetenther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14540#comment-21174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article from NY times pisses me off because he says we should disobey the constitution and cites examples when it was ignored but forgets that eventually everything returned back to it.  There is one question we don&#039;t realize which is if we can disobey the constitution why can&#039;t we disobey the government?  I imagine this author&#039;s reaction would be to simply say NO which highlights the very point of why he wants us to disobey the constitution.  Disobediance to the constitution eliminates all restraints imposed on the government which allows it to govern as it pleases which wouldn&#039;t be a problem if we were simultaniously allowed to disobey that same government.  I doubt he would be OK with that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article from NY times pisses me off because he says we should disobey the constitution and cites examples when it was ignored but forgets that eventually everything returned back to it.  There is one question we don&#8217;t realize which is if we can disobey the constitution why can&#8217;t we disobey the government?  I imagine this author&#8217;s reaction would be to simply say NO which highlights the very point of why he wants us to disobey the constitution.  Disobediance to the constitution eliminates all restraints imposed on the government which allows it to govern as it pleases which wouldn&#8217;t be a problem if we were simultaniously allowed to disobey that same government.  I doubt he would be OK with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
