Comments on: Colorado NDAA Nullification Introduced

By: JamesPowell2

JamesPowell2 — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:42:08 +0000

@KeithSmelser I’m well up on it.

By: JamesPowell2

JamesPowell2 — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:39:32 +0000

@AnthonyRochon Ok I hear you but versions of NDAA and NDRP have been on the books since the 1960. Don’t get me wrong I disagree with it almost completely except for in times of war. Which from what I understand is why they were written in the first place. (I’m so glad I read twice I almost got you wrong) But correct me if I’m wrong are they not going to act federally. They have pretty much nulled the constitutional authority over them, at least on paper. It seems every EO drafted or redrafted since Dec 31,2011 has been to accomplish this. And again correct me if I’m wrong but Is it the the current “redrafts” that have them stepping over the lines with these two specifically. P.S anything you will add is great. I love learning and reading about this stuff. Ears and Eyes open.

By: JamesPowell2

JamesPowell2 — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:16:24 +0000

@KeithSmelser @JamesPowell2 I’m well up on all of it.

By: AnthonyRochon

AnthonyRochon — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:46:01 +0000

@JamesPowell2 Mr. Powell, While your statement is partially true, it is not completely correct. Federal law does supersede state law, but only where the Federal government has been given the right to act by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The 10th Amendment states “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”So, if the power has not been delegated to the “United States” by the constitution, then it is reserved for the states and “the people” exclusively. The current problem is the federal government overstepping those authorities granted to them by the Constitution, which is why the states are now passing nullification statutes.

By: KeithSmelser

KeithSmelser — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:13:09 +0000

@JamesPowell2 Well to your statement, almost every state has petitioned to secede from the USA as a result of the obummer administration. The whole issue is we do not work for our elected officials they work for us, What has been passed with the latest NDAA is beyond unconstitutional. The elected officials who have allowed it to go as far as it has need to be stopped. Our state electorate is giving us another level of checks and balances on our constitution. If you are not paying attention our rights are being stripped away. We need to stand up and be heard.

By: JamesPowell2

JamesPowell2 — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:28:49 +0000

The problem is that Federal Trumps State Law. As Dual Sovereignty. State Constitution is only a broader definition of Federal. State can only write law that is equal to or greater than Federal. If a State Law is written that goes against Federal, Federal is Supreme. Current Example: Californias Marijuanas Law goes against Current Federal. This is why they can come in raid those pot stores and seize it.The only way a state can act one hundred percent sovereign is to petition and remove them selves from the United States.Which has only happened once to my knowledge in 1860. And was known as the Confederate State of America and is called Secession.

By: wizardQi

wizardQi — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 04:06:37 +0000

RT @TenthAmendment: Colorado NDAA Nullification Introduced: http://t.co/fAucEWch #10th

By: BrodieMack1117

BrodieMack1117 — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:18:18 +0000

RT @TenthAmendment: Colorado NDAA Nullification Introduced: http://t.co/fAucEWch #10th

By: StudeDwayne

StudeDwayne — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:39:49 +0000

RT @TenthAmendment: Colorado NDAA Nullification Introduced: http://t.co/fAucEWch #10th

By: tntmotors66

tntmotors66 — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:08:34 +0000

RT @TenthAmendment: Colorado NDAA Nullification Introduced: http://t.co/fAucEWch #10th