<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ever the Jokester, Sebelius Calls Her Rejection of Utah’s Exchange a &#8216;Conditional Approval&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/ever-the-jokester-sebelius-calls-her-rejection-of-utahs-exchange-a-conditional-approval/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/ever-the-jokester-sebelius-calls-her-rejection-of-utahs-exchange-a-conditional-approval/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mandate Amendment</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/ever-the-jokester-sebelius-calls-her-rejection-of-utahs-exchange-a-conditional-approval/#comment-21299</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandate Amendment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14552#comment-21299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rejection of the state exchanges is a great start, along with efforts to repeal Obamacare but it is NOT enough.  The real threat of Obamacare and the Roberts&#039; decision is the precedent it sets.  We need to make a bold and courageous effort to strike at the heart of this dangerous precedent now while much of our country is appalled by the decision and while the infrastructure and dependence upon this law has not yet been sewn into the fabric of our country.
 
The only way to truly destroy this precedent is to amend our Constitution.  Therefore we are proposing, and will pass, the Mandate Amendment.   The amendment reads as follows:
 
Congress shall make no law mandating the purchase of a product or service from a private entity.
 
We have opened up coalitions in Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California in the very short amount of time we have been in existence.  We have also earned the unanimous endorsement of the Massachusetts Libertarian Association.  
 
We are just starting out and we need more help.  Just Google Mandate Amendment or find us on Facebook and Twitter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rejection of the state exchanges is a great start, along with efforts to repeal Obamacare but it is NOT enough.  The real threat of Obamacare and the Roberts&#8217; decision is the precedent it sets.  We need to make a bold and courageous effort to strike at the heart of this dangerous precedent now while much of our country is appalled by the decision and while the infrastructure and dependence upon this law has not yet been sewn into the fabric of our country.<br />
 <br />
The only way to truly destroy this precedent is to amend our Constitution.  Therefore we are proposing, and will pass, the Mandate Amendment.   The amendment reads as follows:<br />
 <br />
Congress shall make no law mandating the purchase of a product or service from a private entity.<br />
 <br />
We have opened up coalitions in Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California in the very short amount of time we have been in existence.  We have also earned the unanimous endorsement of the Massachusetts Libertarian Association.  <br />
 <br />
We are just starting out and we need more help.  Just Google Mandate Amendment or find us on Facebook and Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizardQi</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/ever-the-jokester-sebelius-calls-her-rejection-of-utahs-exchange-a-conditional-approval/#comment-21285</link>
		<dc:creator>wizardQi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14552#comment-21285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RT @TenthAmendment: Ever the Jokester, Sebelius Calls Her Rejection of Utah’s Exchange a &#039;Conditional Approval&#039;: http://t.co/KdaruHC6 #10th]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @TenthAmendment: Ever the Jokester, Sebelius Calls Her Rejection of Utah’s Exchange a &#8216;Conditional Approval&#8217;: <a href="http://t.co/KdaruHC6" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/KdaruHC6</a> #10th</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
