<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oklahoma Senate Bill Aims to Nullify Obamacare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:08:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnLambert1</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/#comment-37669</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnLambert1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14617#comment-37669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ChrisSwenson The Supremacy Clause ONLY applies when  the legislation can be tied back to Article I: Section 8.    Not one single entity is granted the power to be the final arbiter of what is Constitutional or not.  Everyone who takes an Oath on some level is responsible in holding that Oath.    If the Feds show up to a county and wants to detain someone under the NDAA, should the Country Sheriff just stand back and let it happen until the Supreme Court rules on it?  This makes no sense, and is not how the system is suppose to be.  The states are sovereign and do have say on what the Constitution means since it was them who created it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ChrisSwenson The Supremacy Clause ONLY applies when  the legislation can be tied back to Article I: Section 8.    Not one single entity is granted the power to be the final arbiter of what is Constitutional or not.  Everyone who takes an Oath on some level is responsible in holding that Oath.    If the Feds show up to a county and wants to detain someone under the NDAA, should the Country Sheriff just stand back and let it happen until the Supreme Court rules on it?  This makes no sense, and is not how the system is suppose to be.  The states are sovereign and do have say on what the Constitution means since it was them who created it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmellon</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/#comment-21911</link>
		<dc:creator>dmellon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14617#comment-21911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ChrisSwenson Your question has been answered many times on this forum so I suspect the editors are deciding to not bore the readers with a repeat of the answers.  I put a response on your site where you originally posted your questions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ChrisSwenson Your question has been answered many times on this forum so I suspect the editors are deciding to not bore the readers with a repeat of the answers.  I put a response on your site where you originally posted your questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisSwenson</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/#comment-21910</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisSwenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14617#comment-21910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was hoping for some sort of response.  I would like nothing more than be be able to validate the efforts of these states.   Unfortunately to me it appears that by so doing would remove one more brick in the wall of the Constitution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping for some sort of response.  I would like nothing more than be be able to validate the efforts of these states.   Unfortunately to me it appears that by so doing would remove one more brick in the wall of the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nullify ObamaCare in Oklahoma Now</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/#comment-21913</link>
		<dc:creator>Nullify ObamaCare in Oklahoma Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14617#comment-21913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oklahoma Senate Bill Aims to Nullify Obamacare
--&gt; http://bit.ly/UXvtn3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oklahoma Senate Bill Aims to Nullify Obamacare<br />
&#8211;> <a href="http://bit.ly/UXvtn3" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/UXvtn3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisSwenson</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/#comment-21819</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisSwenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14617#comment-21819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like the views of those at the Tenth Amendment center in regards to nullification.  I have posted an article in relation to the concept of Nullification.   I&#039;m not trying to free advertise (at least not in this instance) I am concerned though because the Constitution specifically prohibits these laws.  Article 6 Clause 2.   Seems to me that nullification if allowed would take the powers given to the Supreme Court and would give them to the States.Please do not get me wrong, I think Obamacare, and oppose any legislation imposing infringements to the right to bear arms are also in violation.   I just wonder if we support the constitution, should we not support it all the way?http://speakpolitical.com/sp/?p=317]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like the views of those at the Tenth Amendment center in regards to nullification.  I have posted an article in relation to the concept of Nullification.   I&#8217;m not trying to free advertise (at least not in this instance) I am concerned though because the Constitution specifically prohibits these laws.  Article 6 Clause 2.   Seems to me that nullification if allowed would take the powers given to the Supreme Court and would give them to the States.Please do not get me wrong, I think Obamacare, and oppose any legislation imposing infringements to the right to bear arms are also in violation.   I just wonder if we support the constitution, should we not support it all the way?<a href="http://speakpolitical.com/sp/?p=317" rel="nofollow">http://speakpolitical.com/sp/?p=317</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spartanburg Tea Party &#187; Oklahoma Senate Bill Aims to Nullify Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/#comment-21797</link>
		<dc:creator>Spartanburg Tea Party &#187; Oklahoma Senate Bill Aims to Nullify Obamacare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14617#comment-21797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Move over South Caroline, here comes Oklahoma!  From John Lambert at the Tenth Amendment Center: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Move over South Caroline, here comes Oklahoma!  From John Lambert at the Tenth Amendment Center: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Medina</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/oklahoma-senate-bill-aims-to-nullify-obamacare/#comment-21838</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Medina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=14617#comment-21838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To help insure that we aren&#039;t myopic on this page, I&#039;d love your comments and insight on the latest &quot;austerity&quot; measures being implemented in Greece particularly a ban on paying cash... apparently Spain, Italy and Mexico also have bans on various cash transactions.  http://thedailybell.com/28569/Now-Greece-Bans-Cash]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To help insure that we aren&#8217;t myopic on this page, I&#8217;d love your comments and insight on the latest &#8220;austerity&#8221; measures being implemented in Greece particularly a ban on paying cash&#8230; apparently Spain, Italy and Mexico also have bans on various cash transactions.  <a href="http://thedailybell.com/28569/Now-Greece-Bans-Cash" rel="nofollow">http://thedailybell.com/28569/Now-Greece-Bans-Cash</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
