In response to current threats from the Federal Government on banning firearms, firearms accessories and ammunition, States are beginning to take action to hold the Federal Government to its constitutional limits under the 2nd Amendment. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Wyoming Rep. Kendell Kroeker has sponsored and introduced HB0104. the Firearms Protection Act. Representatives Baker, Burkhart, Jaggi, Miller, Piiparinen, Reeder and Winters and Senators Dockstader and Hicks have co-sponsered this bill.
Wyoming’s Firearms Protection Act, is “an act relating to firearms; providing that any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit the size of a magazine of a firearm or other limitation on in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming; providing a penalty; and providing for an effective date.” This act nullifies all federal laws made after Jan. 1, 2013.
“We need the second amendment because it is the protection for all of our other rights. Without it, those rights have no protection,” Kroeker said.
Passage of the bill is more than a statement; it’s a line in the sand: Wyoming will not let its citizens be intimidated by federal laws. “No public servant…or dealer selling any firearm in this state shall enforce or attempt to enforce any act, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government relating to a personal firearm, firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains exclusively within the borders of Wyoming.”
Beyond such statements, the bill backs things up with some teeth by providing for criminal charges for federal agents who attempt to violate the proposed state law:
“Any official, agent or employee of the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains exclusively within the borders of Wyoming shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be subject to imprisonment for not less than one (1) year and one (1) day or more than five (5) years, a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or both.”
Also, the attorney general may defend a Wyoming citizen against the Federal Government against any ban or law infringing on the right to bear arms.
The right to keep and bear arms is under threat. In a Politico article, Vice President Biden stated, “the president is going to act. There are executive orders, executive action that can be taken. We haven’t decided what that is yet, but we’re compiling it all … as well as legislative action, we believe, is required.”
Executive orders(EO) were never meant to let the executive branch bypass congress and create laws. Article 1 Section 8 says, “the Congress shall have power…to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.”
LEGISLATION AND TRACKING
If you would like to see model legislation to introduce in your state to nullify federal firearm laws, please see The Tenth Amendment Center’s Model Legislation: The 2nd Amendment Preservation Act.
Track the status of 2nd Amendment preservation legislation in states around the country HERE
ACTION ITEMS
Wyoming activists, join the 2nd Amendment Preservation group to support this bill on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/groups/2ndAmendmentWyoming/
If you are a Wyoming resident and have concerns about the federal government banning firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition and would like to see this get assigned to a committee and be up for debate on the house floor, please contact your Representative at this link.
If you would like to get your state to nullify federal firearm bans please contact your own state representative and strongly, but politely ask them to introduce similar legislation today.
Kelli Sladick
Latest posts by Kelli Sladick (see all)
- Action Alert: Protect the Fourth Amendment in Iowa - February 12, 2015
- Oklahoma Action Alert: Help Reject Federal Overreach, Pass SJR23 - February 10, 2015
- Indiana Bill a First Step Towards Stopping Federal Tracking via License Plate Readers - February 5, 2015


GOD BLESS AMERICA.
its about times for American to stand up for our rights.
@CHOANG Why should God bless a cohort of child murdering sociopaths whose only mission in life is to increase their personal wealth at the expense of the lives of the millions of individuals they have genocided so Americans can eat at McDonalds 24/7? WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? If you mean God, please restore the DCBR, well, get going! Otherwise SHUT UP! You look like an idiot when you do that.
Regarding Koepka’s latest post: some of us do have a memory, eh? Keep it up with the (accurate) info. Education is paramount – even among the “fraternity” !
You know that there are tensions between state and federal laws on some issues…here’s one state’s response to the possibility of gun ban http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
Wyoming Representative Kendell Kroeker is introducing ‘The Firearms Protection Act’ that will nullify any federal laws that impose a ban on semi-automatic firearms and magazine size. [The bill includes criminal charges for federal agents who would violate the law.]
It seems that most Americans do not understand the simple fact that the Constitution is OUR contract with the national government. It was meant to define just what that government may do with our consent, and the rest is up to the States and to We the People.Subtle yet significant changes were made since the original document was ratified that Congress has taken upon itself to further the usurpation of our rights. The main problem for those of us is that most people do not get that we do not get those rights from government, we are granted rights by our Creator. It is further misinterpreted that government will be the protectors of those rights.
We must be the protectors just as we must protect our families and properties. The limited duties granted by us to the government was to produce fairness for all in commerce and trade, to protect the borders from invasion by enemies, to establish a monetary system that protects the fruits of our labors, and allow the markets to be free for trade among the States and other nations.
If we are to return this nation to the greatness and prosperity that made it the goal of all other nations to achieve, we must restore the liberty that once was cherished by all people of the world, so much so, that they were willing to come to America with little or nothing and enjoy the opportunity to prosper.
@FredMarsico You hit the nail on the head. The politicians work for us. They are our representatives, and if they don’t represent our values and our opinions, then we need to replace them. I’m fearful that we’ve waited to long to realize what is happening. We may have been lax in expressing our dislike for what they’re doing and allowed them to believe that we’re not watching and that there’s nothing we can do to stop this downhill slide that our country is currently experiencing. If our founding fathers were here now, it would be a different story, I’m sure.
@MichaelBroadway @FredMarsico Replace them, yes. Voluntarily, NO. We are in HUGE need of a well regulated militia. WE-DON’T-HAVE-A-WELL-REGULATED-MILITIA!
@FredMarsico Quite right, but restoring those liberties is where the problem is. How do we do that??We have been trying to do that through the voting process for years and the result has been we keep losing our freedom. We have two political partys that are Hell bent on taking those freedoms.And they have been very successful.Doing the same thing over and over has brought us to the brink of destruction. so what is the alternative? The answer to that will restore this nation once again to the land of the free.
@Robert kepka We will have restore them as our founders obtained them. That will require installing anew government, that will make the Constitution the law of the land once again.
We will have to end the central banking system that is the Federal Reserve, and remove the fictitious personage that is corporations. The ability of banks to create money without assets to back that money is the root cause of inflation. Return to a system where our currency is backed with assets of worth, silver and gold and even corn and wheat.
Will will need to restore the Title of Nobility Amendment that was ‘misplaced’ after the War of 1812, and make it known that it was properly ratified. We will also have to return the voting of Senators back to the States and have the proper balance restored to Congress.
We must also repeal the 16th Amendment and stop the taxation of wages. The people our entitled to keep the fruits of their labors. We must stop aiding foreign nations with funds that are used to build armies and suppress the rights of their own people. We may enjoy commerce and trade with foreign nations but we need to butt out of their politics.
Restore militias as they once were as the local protection and a State militia under the governor’s direction and called to serve the national army only during times of declared war. Repeal or nullify the unconstitutional War Powers Act and stop the government from keeping standing armies during times of peace.
Return the writing of laws to the People in States in which they reside and elect citizen representation that are not members of the Bar(risters) Association who are loyal to the Crown (see Title of Nobility Amendment – the original thirteenth Amendment.)
Do all these things with well armed citizens and this nation will be restored to the prosperous and free republic that it was created to be!
@FredMarsico I understand what you are saying. The people do need to be armed. But to be successful the people would need the military. And this could happen only if there was a revolt in the military. Many Upper level officers are NWO members. These traitors would have to lose command. It would be impossible to fight armored vehicles with rifles.I had hoped some yonger person would have the courage and ability to organize a third political party based on constitutional conservatism. If there ever was atime in our4 history it would be now.. Strict vetting would preserve the integrity of such a party and would desimate tyhe other two political parties, Outside of armed conflict this would be the only way to have a government of statesmen.
@Robert kepka We don’t “need” the military but we do need parity of arms. There are many veterans and current military that will keep their oaths and not obey unconstitutional orders to fire upon US citizens.
The problem lies in the fact that most of our military are fighting for resources for the corporations that are backed by the State Department and CIA and the troops that will be on the ground here in the US will be UN troops who will have no problem killing us.
@Robert kepka @FredMarsico Hence militia.
@FredMarsico Quite right about UN troops there is also an agreement with Canada signed by Obama early in his first term to bring Canadian troops into the U.S. in case of an uprising or natural disaster. I am not sure if this was part of the the North American Union Bush signed with Mexico and Canada Also Fema has been supplying Armored vehicles to local police departments. put all this together and it should show you the need for the Military and their armor. We can not fight armor with rifles
The UN doesn’t have a standing army. The UN can only send troops who are voluntarily assigned to the UN by the member nations. Member nations who are Muslim, or other America-hating third world countries will agree to send their troops under the UN flag. The other sensible nations want nothing to do with armed Americans. That’s OK too, we’ll fight all they send, and eliminate them.
@OdellHarwell There are 160 member nations. Some like Russia and China have huge military with plenty of armor. North Korea has a huge army Do you really think these nations would defer sending troops and equipment to the UN? And where would we without our military get armor? During the Battle of the Bulge WWII our regiment had a 10 mile sector to defend. We had no armor our heaviest weapons were bazookas and 50 caliber machine guns. Our orders were to hold out as long as we could. Had the Germans decided to concentrate on our sector we would have been no match for tanks a 88 canon.I am not saying we may not come to conflict but if we do we had better quietly get the head of the snake first
@Robert kepka @FredMarsico Google “The Battle of Athens, Tennesee.” See how other Americans battled the corrupt establishment.
@OdellHarwell @Robert kepka @FredMarsico Yes, the Battle of Athens is a good reminder to us all, how we can fight and succeed in preserving the liberty our founders fought and died to give us.
Please see:
http://fixamerica-fredmars.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-meaning-of-liberty.html
@FredMarsico Hey, another motivational speaker!
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
Just received an email reply from U.S. Senator Roy Blunt. We need more representatives who think like him…
Dear Michael,
Thank you for contacting me regarding the rights of gun owners.
As you may know, I am a strong defender of our Second Amendment rights. The right of law-abiding citizens to own firearms is an individual right guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution and broadly interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. Our Founders clearly understood that one of the most basic rights of Americans is the ability to defend themselves and their families.
In light of the terrible tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, there have been calls for immediate action to address gun control. I do believe it is important that we have a serious national discussion about preventing these senseless acts of violence and protecting our children in their schools. Equally important, however, is an effort that more broadly addresses ways to spend federal dollars more wisely when it comes to treating and identifying those who are mentally ill as well as intervening before they tragically impact their own lives and the lives of others.
There are no easy answers here. I continue to believe that a weapons ban does not fix the issue. Whatever we do, it must be consistent with the Constitution.
I appreciate your thoughts and will continue to support legislation that safeguards our Second Amendment rights, encourages safe and responsible gun ownership, and keeps our homes and families safe.
Again, thank you for contacting me. I look forward to continuing our conversation on Facebook (www.facebook.com/SenatorBlunt) and Twitter (www.twitter.com/RoyBlunt) about the important issues facing Missouri and the country. I also encourage you to visit my website (blunt.senate.gov) to learn more about where I stand on the issues and sign-up for my e-newsletter.
Sincere regards,
Roy Blunt
United States Senator
@MichaelBroadway Focusing on mental illness will bring even MORE of the SSRIs into the picture until these abhorrent drugs are exposed for what they are and what they do. BigPharm is rubbing its evil paws in glee when they hear these well-schooled notions that are endlessly parroted by the lamestream media.
While I applaud WY for doing this, I can go ahead and tell you what’s going to happen if it passes. Our esteemed DOJ will challenge it in federal court and will be struck down. The question after that happens is what do the people and the WY state legislature do then? Someone please remind me what the benefit is to remaining in this American union.
@Patrick Henry Patrick, I am not so sure it would be struck down by federal courts. It seems to be cleverly worded to give the courts little justification to overturn it, and with today’s Supreme Court they still need some rationale to declare a law unconstitutional. And secondly, so what if they do? The whole concept behind the tenth amendment movement is that it is the people and the states that have the power to decide the constitutionality of laws so other states that believe this concept may still adopt WY type laws.
@dmellon Well I hope you’re right, but you don’t have to go back very far to see what kind of influence fedzilla has on the states. Obamacare and Arizona’s SB 1070 are 2 recent examples.. They will threaten to withhold medicare or highway funds and it’ll be over, watch and see!
@Patrick Henry I think the consequences you mention and others would be well thought through before the law was approved by the legislature. But lets assume the law is overturned by the federal courts, I would hope the people of WY and their legislature would say they disagree and will keep the law on the books much like CO and WA have recently done. In that case I would imagine that the feds would do nothing until a federal agent was arrested for trying to enforce a ban of some sort. That would be the point at which the people and the courts actually decide if the tenth amendment applies or not.
@Patrick Henry @dmellon With that thought in mind, I remember reading a few years ago about a state (maybe Colorado?) where someone tried to pass a bill that would effectively deal with cutting out the ability of the feds to hold money over the states heads the way they’ve been doing. The idea was this: The state passes a law saying that any/all tax money coming from citizens of that state must go directly to that state. Then the _state_ sends it to the feds, only if and when they choose to. That way anytime the feds are doing something unconstitutional, the state just says NO, and that’s that. The feds can’t withhold what they never receive in the first place.
Sure, that would cause an uproar, but hey… something like that is eventually gonna have to be done, if the federal government is ever gonna be put back in it’s proper constitutional place.
@Equality 7_2521 I think that probably would cause less of an uproar than expected; they’ll just borrow more from Bernanke……problem solved.
@RedTulie The part I like about it is that it would keep the states from having to dance to the tune of the federal government in order to get income tax money back that rightfully belongs to them. Currently, people’s income tax money goes straight to the IRS, then the federal government makes the states do things they don’t want to do in order for the feds to allow them to have that same money for the use of the state. If the state gets that money from their citizens at tax time instead of the IRS getting it, then the federal government can’t use it as a tool to manipulate the states.
@Patrick Henry
Just because it is struck down by some lackey federal judge doesn’t mean it still can’t stand. This is nullification, and nullification is meant to push back whether the federal government likes it or not. States and individuals have their spheres of sovereignty and they have to stand up and protect them. If the position leading to the nullification is constitutional and supportive of our natural rights, which are ours before the constitution and regardless of it, then the act of striking it down is contrary to the constitution, our founding and our natural rights and the state needs to ignore it and keep going. The courts by themselves DO NOT have the final say in our rights.
@Jdangiel I know what nullification is and I agree that the states should start asserting their 10th amendment right and start telling the feds to go pound sand. But someone please show me an example of where it’s happening. Like I said, the states are like welfare recipients. They’re on the dole too, and that’s all Uncle Scam has to do is threaten their medicaid or highway funds and they fall on their knees and start begging.
I brought this up a while back because I remember it like it was yesterday. Louisiana was the last state in the union to raise the drinking age to 21 and they weren’t going to. Well, the feds stepped in and said that they didn’t have to comply. But we’re going to withhold your federal highway funds until you do. Guess what the legal drinking age is in LA now!
@Patrick Henry When we finally get serious about telling the feds to go eff themselves we will STOP sending all our money (stolen tax money) to them and start spending it on the damned states.
@RedTulie That’s EXACTLY what needs to start happening. I’ll be the first one to raise a glass of ale to all of you when it does.
@RedTulie @Patrick Henry Wishful thinking. Ron Paul had been fighting the Fed for more than 20 years. The Republican party marginalized him and the sheep concurred.We can not even get an audit of the Fed bill passed. What Paul predicted would happen is happening. We are broke. The Fed owns 60% of the debt. How did the Fed make all this money and we are broke? Could the Fed Buying the money from us at $20 for $1000 in bills and the lending it out at face value have anything to do with it? President Kennedy wanted to go back to a gold standard and look what happened to him.
@RedTulie Something else that bears mentioning is that I don’t trust ANY govt. There’s state and local govts. that are just as corrupt as Leviathan. The difference is that if we start forming smaller confederations, it’ll be easier to manage. I ask people this question, which of your elected representatives are more responsive to you. The ones that are hundreds or even thousands of miles away. Or the city/county commissioner or mayor that may possibly live right down the road from you. It’s about size and scale folks, we’re completely out of scale. This beast has gotten WAY too big!
@Robert kepka @RedTulie @Patrick Henry
@Patrick Henry Exactly right. Though I’ve seen breathtaking corruption at city & county levels in Colorado, it still beats having to grapple with a tyrant that is so huge and nebulous as what our fed gov has become. It’s all about waking up the sheeple to what’s going on right in front of them.
@Robert kepka @RedTulie @Patrick Henry Americans are bred on stupidity and laziness.
@coastx @RedTulie @Patrick Henry Coastx Many of those born after 1963
@Robert kepka
He’s a troll my friend. A condescending, pompous jerk who used to go by the name of gypsynovus here. I guess he got tired of people ignoring him and changed his username. Pay him no attention!
@Patrick Henry I take no offense. Sometimes egos overtake intelligence. We have to roll with it.
@Patrick Henry This is PH’s version of “We’re okay, coastx is NOT okay!” When people suck up to me like that I tell them I don’t liberal OR gay. Ewe!
@Patrick Henry@Jdangiel
For the States to be on the dole would require that the States somehow receive someone else’s money. How can that be — above all, for the poorer States whose money, property and land (stolen and confiscated by means of force and threat) is actually used AGAINST them (and the individuals that compose them) by the Federal government — a governing body that was created to be not their judge and adversary but to be their agent?
For too many States, more money is being forcibly taken from within their boarders for not their mutual benefit, but for the benefit of other member States where there are more votes that can be more easily bought.
Is this for what the States joined this union? How can staying in this union or not defending themselves in any way be to their benefit — or to stand idly by and allow their (supposed) agent spend them into oblivion?
Consider this: The credit that the Federal government is using (destroying) is not the Federal government’s, but rather it is credit that was GRANTED to it and meant to be used for the PRESERVATION of the grantors — NOT to be used for their destruction!
The problem is that the States that are being taken advantage of (and destroyed) by the Federal government seem to be just plain stupid — about the dumbest States on this planet. They sit idle while the Federal government is used by other member States as an aggressive force against them to facilitate the thievery of their property, wealth, freedom, rights and sovereignty — and the utter annihilation of their credit — draining them of, and destroying everything that the Federal government was established to safeguard and preserve.
Instead of the Federal government using the powers granted and entrusted to it for the preservation of the States, it is doing everything to destroy them and render them insignificant.
Interestingly, the 2nd makes plain, as does the whole instrument, who ARE the masters and who IS the servant and agent — and, who are the sovereigns and who is NOT the sovereign (with only few LIMITED sovereign powers granted to it by the true sovereigns) — with the 2nd meant to GUARANTEE that the States have the tools and means to SUCCESSFULLY defend themselves from a tyrannical governing head; for, if the 2nd does not guarantee the tools and means for a successful defense, then it means nothing and is reduced to a mere decoration and a footnote that is nothing more than a mere passing mention of what were once free and sovereign States and are now no more than forgotten memories, reduce to mere colonies enslaved to be forever in service to its new master.
Whether anyone wants to admit it, the Federal government is at WAR with the States — especially those that have not yet fallen to its will. But, without the remaining States putting up proper resistance and defense — by exercising the rights and guarantees that they insisted upon for their own preservation by those that were first to join this Union — they simply make it easy for their aggressors to facilitate their eventual fall and ultimate demise.
@ObliterateTyranny @Patrick Henry @Jdangiel Constitutionalists are principled on the DCBR empowered by reason. Neopoliticians AKA liberal are a single party parliamentary entity debauchery pledged to city state Globalist entity, Cult of Castores.
Constitutionalists care, but they are not wiling to assert the 2nd amendment their militia having been outlawed by the NRA, Posse Comitatus and a plethora of UK inspired legislation 1936 through 2011 directed at repatriation.
People don’t like to hear this about the NRA, but the question then is what happened to our militia? You won’t get an intelligent answer from the NRA. It’s equivalent would have been the NMA, NOT the the clearing house and entertainment based entities that have come up in the US the past couple of years.
Liberals DON’T care and they are VERY willing to assert atramental policy making which circumvents and derails the DCBR. It’s not a philosophy to them. It’s a job, which is why they are good at it. They get the job done, and they are rewarded for this with unchecked access to money, drugs and sex (BDSM/Pedophilia).
In the US, maintenance on the DCBR is a philosophy, which is why it’s fallen to disuse. You have to work at it to sustain it, and I don’t think people quite understand this. What they believe is the DCBR has some kind of magical power that will summons God to do our fighting for us. That’s not going to happen.
God is intelligence, and to manifest God man has to use his intelligence. Right now, in the US, people are too sleepy to care. They fight every effort to educate them, and they DO NOT and WILL NOT perceive error in Obama who bears a perpetual smile on his face to bewilder their sensibilities.
No road ahead.
@Patrick Henry @Jdangiel Obliterate Tyranny, when you say the Federal government is at war with the States you have it right. But this has been going on for many years while we slept. The un constitutional duplicating state agencies and then holding back the money to operate those state agencies unless conforming to the Fed demands has been the leading factor in states losing their sovereignty. Removing these agencies from the Fed or paying the tax money first to the state treasury , having the treasury keep the money needed to operate that agency in the state and sending a small portion to the fed to operate their agency This would take the power away from the Fed. But at any rate accomplishing anything will be very difficult since the NWO has control of the Fed and some of the state governments. and in all of the states their influence is felt as far down as some of the county and city level. Exposing these traitors would be a big step in getting our nation back to constitutional government. They are successful because they stay hidden.
@Robert kepka @Patrick Henry @Jdangiel The city state is a 3000 year old Globalist scheme in the making. It is the Cult of Castores.
To “Robert” and others who read my post and responded – or did not: Robert intimated that our “representative” prostitutes are essentially whores of banking, world banking, corporate oligarchy, the World Bank, World Monetary Fund and – in a more collective sense – the New World Order – touted by none other than Republican George H.W. Bush (my “interpretation” of Robert’s response). The global elitists who represent those entities are the apex apes. – thus the true “targets”. I would suggest, however, that they would have small chance to succeed in their mission had they not the prostitutes to either “ignore” the agenda – or to actually promote that (agenda) through legislation. Attacks on the Second Amendment are a case-in-point for obvious reasons. For readers who truly want critical information on the global corporate / economic control cabal, I strongly suggest you find the book “Confessions of an Economic Hitman”. By contemporary values, it is a lenghthy and “booring” read but, boy, is it an eye opener !!
@4b4mac If you want to know”WHO” I suggest reading WHO’S WHO of the ELITE by Robert Gaylon Ross, SR
@Robert kepka Robert: Thanks for sharing your knowledge of into source. I’l find it. Have attempted many web searches for a concise source of this info with poor luck. Thanks again.
4b4mac
@Robert kepka After thought to Robert: Curious….Does “Who’s Who” include info about individuals’ activity with particular corps, banks, governmental “activities”, etc?
4b4mac
@4b4mac YES!!
@4b4mac Focus people. You’re parroting Alex Jones. Good as his information is, you have got to take it to the next level. The “globalist” scheme is a city/state model, it’s leadership traditionally divided among the Vatican, City of London and whatever government would militarize to conquer the planet. The US has been recruited to the latter now highly unstable with increasing pressure from the middle east to fulfill this role via city state recruited and trained transnationals. Not surprisingly Iran has thus far survived the middle east conflict for a reason. Start there. Also, be aware, and this is going to sting and burn, but the Vatican is a child sacrifice entity sharing this in common and competitive with the Mormon church which is a black mass entity. That;s going to piss you off no doubt, but it’s true. They do this for a couple of reasons: 1) to resource their international BDSM/pedophilia enterprise, and 2) to cull the Eve Novus thus breeding down human intelligence so they can control you. They are actually breeding the Eve to their own bloodlines manufacturing as it were a population of sociopaths who, like you, are engineered to a purpose to fulfill for the city state. This is nothing new, albeit this may be the first time you have read anything about this. This information ALWAYS draws fire. Process it anyway and begin looking at the problem from this perspective and stop the infighting Bred hatred is Machiavelli. Know this.
@4b4mac <iframe src=”http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=fixame-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0452287081&ref=qf_sp_asin_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=E7D988&f=ifr” style=”width:120px;height:240px;” scrolling=”no” marginwidth=”0″ marginheight=”0″ frameborder=”0″></iframe>
Get it here!
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
TRUE STORY
If, in fact, an executive order is used to direct / order cabinet, agency heads, etc. to conduct tasks in prescribed manner(s) it would seem, then, that the president stands alone in the matter. ie – he is solely responsible for the action. That being the case, shouldn’t he/she stand as responsible for personally violating Constitutional law? The Constitution is law, isn’t it? It also seems that our revered “representatives” have lost most regard for our most basic of laws (as well).
Regarding Revolutionary War arms: Two primary weapon systems ruled the conflict….muskets and cannon. Muskets pretty much represented parity. Cannon came to represent some degree of parity – particularly after the Colonials won a few fights and captured Brit cannon. That’s pretty much that.
Now consider this factoid little known by our “public”: German gunmakers had come up with an advantage in increased accuracy as they cut a spiral pattern of longitudinal grooves into the bores of rifles. Thus, the most appropriate term – rifling. Gun maker colonials of German descent living primarily in Pennsylvania had picked up on this. Muskets of the day had no rifled barrels and fired inherently unstable lead balls through what were essentially shotgun barrels that could scarcely strike a man-sized target at 150 feet – even in the hands of the most proficient infantry. A spinning ball fired from a rifled barrel could take down an enemy at 300 feet (100 yards or better) with reliability in the hands of a marksman. Here is the beginning of the sniper. The strict regimentation of Brit forces was entirely built around the command of officers – and the Brits made a big to-do about distinctive officers dress – plus, they were always on horseback. The colonials knew this. Their marksmen fired from trees or covering terrain and specifically targeted Brit commanders. Once the commanders fell, Brit infantry was lost and ineffective. The point: This advance in technology we now take for granted made a big difference for colonists success in prosecuting the war. In this particular manner, the colonists had an advantage in arms.
Now, the Second Amendment to our Constitution recognized this aspect of things – even though it was written well before the war. We hear of guns for hunting. Constitutionally speaking, this is baloney. During colonial times, hunting was a given – period. (We now classify hunting as a privelege.) The framers wrote the Second Amendment with personal protection (family / property, etc.) well in mind but specifically as back-up for protection of liberties against those enemies they felt certain to emerge from without and WITHIN! Given the government from which they had flown, the framers DID NOT TRUST GOVERNMENT ! These were learned men. They knew damned well that governments ALWAYS putrify – no matter the kind. Many wrote that they suspected that our government would putrify and become treacherous – regardless of their magnifcent effort to provide a blueprint designed to minimize the chances. GUESS WHAT HAS HAPPENED – AND WHAT WE ARE NOW FACING? (As though it hasn’t been happening for many decades!)
What, one must ask, has changed? Does any knowledgeable citizen doubt that the framers were flat out intelligent, circumspect to a fault, and decidedly wise. The citizen who does not is either abjectly ignorant or an outright idiot! Sadly, we are burdened with ship loads of idiots! Our framers were not the only who had such wisdom. A Frenchman, Alexis deToquiville wrote eloquently of governments and liberties. He was a SUBJECT of Louis XVI. The founders knew well of him. Google deToquevill and read for yourselves.
We hear various nabobs blather about how civilian arms must not use “large capacity” cartridge magazines. I’m a lifelong hunter. It is FACT that any who use a rifle in hunting do not need 10 round (or more) ammo magazines. Any hunter who hasn’t achieved sufficient skills in marksmanship and the requisite wisdom to select acceptible shots does not belong in the field! Many states that allow AR platform (and other semi-auto) types of rifles for hunting require the use of low total magazines (usually no more than five rounds) for reason. BUT, as per above, the primary reasons for the Second Amendment were not about hunting, remember? It is about the enemy from without and from WITHIN. Should our situation with government ever come to decisive armed conflict, will current civilian arms put patriots on par with forces employed to put them down? Not a chance! BUT, will the arms now available provide a very significant message to any determined to strip the nation of its liberties? Yup! AND DON’T THINK for a Manhattan second that (“they”) don’t know it! Why in the name of Jehosophat would one think (“they”) are so hell-bent on stiff infringement of the Second – which, by the way – could easily segue into outright confiscation? Sure, there are those who are so feeble as to support restrictions upon the souls of those lost in Aurora and Newtown, etc. Honestly, I grieve for those people and babies just as much as they. Given that I believe so strongly in the Second and the responsible use of arms, I might actually grieve more strongly. We have, however, no right to destroy our national back-up for the defense of liberty on the souls of those lost to madmen.
Ben Franklin wrote a very succinct piece that applies to our situation better than any other thing I’ve read: I paraphrase……….
“THOSE WILLING TO SACRIFICE A LIBERTY FOR A TEMPORARY BIT OF (so called) SECURITY DESERVE NEITHER LIBERTY NOR FREEDOM”.
@4b4mac Nice work here! The difference between colonials and today’s MacDonald’s breed is the former were competitive with British government. The latter embrace it. I’m a debater in practice, but in your case, I can’t in good conscience argue with your insight and narrative skill. Good work!
@4b4mac Thank youy for your reply. Very informative and well written. Whether we realize it or not we are at war here at home.. You mentioned the Brit infantry became ineffective when the commander fell.. And that is the strategy we must use. We know those we elect in office are not the commanders. and it is those commanders who stay hidden we mus bring into the light and taget them for exposure. And if it were to become a shooting war(GOD FORBID) in this nation we would know whothe enemy is.
@4b4mac Executive order is not legislative. It’s the equivalent of a fire drill. Any legislation to confiscate will issue ONLY on 2/3 vote to do same by the senate. The senate is not ready to take this risk with their constituency. Regarding ammunition clips, they are bluffing on confiscation and will back off to clips which the senate WILL vote for with a 2/3 majority, because this entity is a single party liberal neopolitical organization, and they plan together on these little sorties in their mission to repatriate the US. People don’t understand this. They are bred STUPID so they won’t.
AMERICAN PATRIOT says: You calling me STUPID, boy?
COASTX says: Yep!
AMERICAN PATRIOT says: You got proof of that?
COASTX says: Yep! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^
@coastx @4b4mac In my uneducated humble opinion I would like to say arguing and name calling are un productive to solving our problems. In my 87 years of life i have seen many attempts at bringing our nation back to a constitutional Republic fail due to differences in opinion that were not solved through reason and deliberation. The fact is most Americas are a bit naive when it comes to the cause of our decline. This is because the truth has been hidden and they have not been able or capable of looking beyond the obvious.It is so difficult for anyone who loves his country to believe his own government and political party is destroying the country he loves that we reject any thought of it. Blogs of his kind serve to open peoples eyes. let’s not destroy it with bickering between ourselves.
Again to Kepka with apologies for previous misspelling of surname:
I’m 68 – just a bit younger but old enough to find par. I make no apologies for involvement that might appear topsome as bickering, etc. I am a stickler about the articulation of truth and accuracy and consider it a duty to correct those who appear in arrears. I’ll take my medicine when proven wrong. In the meantime, I’ll stick with the effort to educate.
@4b4mac You are quite right on your position. What I am talking about is demeaning someone or name calling.Quite different.
If your opinion was humble you wouldn’t have one. Here old man. In your years of experience on this planet, here’s what you missed that come up in your Garden of Eden. Sometimes you have to pull the weeds.
Sandy Hook was a FEMA psyop. It didn’t happen. They did this for a couple of reasons, and I don’t think the actors are entirely aware of this yet.
This was an attempt to bury Obama’s involvement in the Holly Bobo kidnapping which linked he, Schwarzenegger, Soros and Bredesen to 7 other abduction victims March 3, 2009 through October 30, 2011, commemorative on Fast and Furious. There were 11 such victims 1974 through 2011 commemorative on anti-terror legislation.
Fast and Furious was a decade in the making, and these abduction victims – celebratory on occult rendition – were used black mass. This having unraveled unexpectedly April 23, 2011, was the reason for Obama’s Bin Laden fiasco, Schwarzenegger’s alleged illegitimate son, Oslo/Utoya, the London Riots, Amy Winehouse and OWS. Virtually all of this was orchestrated to shield Obama AND the monarchy from involvement in occult rendition to resource BDSM/pedophilia with “products” acquired in the US.
Holly Bobo was such a product. So were Katelyn Markham, Brittanee Drexel, Megan Maxwell, Paige Johnson. Lauren Spierer, Crystal Hall, Karen Swift, Laurie Partridge (1974), Natalee Holloway (2005) and Robyn Gardner (2011). All black mass abductions. All co-perped by team Obama, with the exception of conscionable involvement in the Partridge abduction.
Why this was so important April 2011 is something not many people are aware of. Team Obama was certain people were too stupid to perceive their human trafficking racketeering scheme, and to be perfectly honest with you, people are in fact this stupid. Thank your lucky stars for Karen and Dana Bobo, because they are the ones who exposed this macabre enterprise, both of them holding out irresolute to have their daughter returned to their family unharmed. This kind of determination reaches out to God for help, and that help presented by exposing a human sacrifice cabal known as the Cult of Castores AKA the Mormon Church with links to the Baptist church and back to the monarchy and such notorious institutional pedophiles as Boris Johnson, Davis Cameron, Piers Morgan, Jose Manuel Boroso and the British monarchy.
Now you can continue to play stupid, fair minded and pathologically normal all the while this occult enterprise will NOT be impeded. While you’re being bred stupid, Obama’s increase his personal security detail for life. Why? HE’S not stupid! You only need to ask that question if YOU are stupid. Obama is a Drac, and he is affiliated with a Drac organization, the Cult of Castores. You want proof, because your stupid, but I’ll give you proof nonetheless, because you’re stupid! Stupid stupid! Your reputation precedes you.
April 2011 was just a few weeks away from Kevin Arnett’s ITCCS hearing in London addressing the Queen of England’s involvement in the kidnapping, torture and sacrifice of 10 Canadian aboriginal children in 1964, a practice that had claimed the lives of 50 thousand children between 1850 and the early 1960s, ALL CULT OF CASTORES. The numbers in the US were 300 thousand black mass between 1888 and 2011.
Like I said, April 23 was a potential nightmare for team Obama, so he attempted to shield himself via shock and awe that reached across the Atlantic to also diffuse Rupert Murdoch’s involvement in kidnapping for torture. Milly Dowler wasn’t just a phone hacking scandal. She was stalked via satellite cell phone technology which empowered her abductors to take her free of encumbrance of witnesses, and this was the same technology they used in the US to kidnap Markham through Swift. this was a Piers Morgan specialty.
THIS is what Obama was afraid of the public finding out. Dowler was occult rendition, this matrixing application used to herd “products” for use in ritual human sacrifice in the wake of Arnet’s work. In other words, They are doing the same thing in the US/UK Arnet is pursuing against the Windsors involvement in a 1964 event YOU don’t even know about and in continuance of complete and reckless disregard of the rule of law on either continent. They have no boundaries unless you force the issue, hence the immediate need for gun control so you won’t be able to throw them off.
Occult rendition is a 3000 year project in the making. They do not wish to lose control of this to an April 23, 2011 event that collapsed their standing plan to acculturate the world to kidnapping for torture, and to force the issue, they reconvened the Council of Nicaea via Bilderberg, one of Queen Elizabeth’s pet projects, every one of these participants tightly knighted via the debauchery pledge in perpetuity with death the consequence for redaction. The knighthood is a mask for sociopathy. Back to stupid, they’ll fade for the moment knowing damn good and well there’s a buzz surrounding them involved in human sacrifice for entertainment, and STUPID FXCKXNG Americans will likewise fade from the effort to sustain a resistance, because Americans are Lazy AND stupid.
“WE GOT GUNS!” It meaningless without militia, but being stupid you haven’t yet figured this out; when you do you’ll line up for team Obama’s militia… because you’re S T U P I D!
You’ve been bred to this state of mind on the black mass. Every female they take is an Eve Novus, the hereditary link to the Novus, or our next developmental epoch in mankind. The elite are taking this for themselves breeding their abduction victims to such monsters as the Mormon presidency in high numbers, sacrificing the female at term and renditioning the infant a sociopath, and they are VERY practiced in this macabre eugenics.
They are literally breeding sociopaths! Non-sociopaths don’t fight back. It’s difficult for someone who values life to take the life of another, but some people are wired for self-preservation nonetheless and can and will rise to the occasion if pressed to it. This individual is the Novus. Either end of this person’s DNA, left is predator, and right is prey, and at the current time, under the current circumstances, Americans are prey, because you’re stupid. I get a kick out of this discussion, because people will invariably look at me and ask, “Why are they doing this?” IT DOESN’T MATTER. THEY ARE DOING IT, STUPID!
Obama and his UK cohorts are predators, and they prove the viability of their “species” with every lie you let them get away with it. They celebrate BSDM/pedophilia. You know this, but you are too stupid to stop them. They know you know this, and they ALSO know you’ll stop for a Big Mac before you’ll thinks about feeding your character. They didn’t breed you for character. They bred you to be FXCKXNG STUPID! You want proof that you are stupid, I know. Poor babies, there are over 2000 restrictions on firearms in the US. The 2nd Amendment, an inalienable right, states plaintively, “… shall not be infringed.” Your proof.
We don’t need restrictions on fire arms. We need calibration and militia, because tyrants characteristically contravene and usurp and enslave free and independent people, but this was too has diminished on legislation which, presenting in preservation of your constitutional rights, actually curtailed formation of militia (1871, 1878, 1943, 1994, 2004, 2013 and beyond).
They’re getting away with this because you’re bred stupid. Intelligent people DO NOT allow themselves to be used in this manner and will fight back. On the other hand, YOU folks will mull this over, determine the validity of an argument which challenges the status quo and let go your vigilance with the first pornographic image of a nude 5 year old Brittany Spears that flashes across your screen, hence your introduction to the macabre of pedophilia, they on the other end of your network increasing your addiction and fulfilling your macabre fantasies, your gun, principles and watch quietly removed from your presence while you sit there and masturbate.
THIS is the culture of America, and Obama having staked his career and life on this enterprise got a rude awakening April 23, 2011 that not every one is asleep at the monitor. FBI, CIA, State department, DHS, Shriners, David Icke, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Free Masons, Illuminati, all of these subordinate to the Cult of Castores, even you, because you’re lazy and stupid.
America: Land of the stupid. Home of the lazy. Stupid and lazy. If YOU didn’t figure it out, you aren’t thinking about it. The world revolves around you, your magic mirror slowly fading to some unimaginable Twilight Zone that’s trapped your imagination curious about what appears to be a mist forming around your head. That’s not a halo, dumbfucks. It’s a haze!
Obama’s a child ax murderer, and yet he got 59 million votes. Stupid Americans. The queen of England is a child ax murderer, and yet people flock to her identified as her subjects (911 memorial). Stupid Americans. Piers Morgan is a child ax murderer, and yet he has a following of 600 thousand in the US…STUPID AMERICANS!
I’d say their breeding program is working great! Lets eat!
@coastx You have to fight fire with fire. No one wins a street fight by fighting with the boxing rules. But first you have to know who your enemy is. And I think it is being spoken of more openly
@coastx Well Your quite the put down artist and i’s good to know you are such an authority. You don’t tell anything new. It just may be new to you. Wise up
@Robert kepka No one wins a fight in madness, either. Today’s culture isn’t ready for a fight and never will be. There’s a little heat on the liberal movement for the moment, but people won’t sustain it. They want the process to work automatically, which the liberal movement will come back to life giving them automatic! They have to train in perpetuity to be free in perpetuity. Love, peace and harmony is occult. It’s the clique. It’s the business cohort. It’s people who believe dressing, talking and smiling alike are the good life. People like you who preach the gospel of getting along for the sake of group think. Bite me, fucker!
Michael Broadway at the time our constituion was written, the weapon of the day was the musket.Civillians had them and the military had them. They were pretty much on a par with weapons. Few cvillians would have a canon. .however automatic weapons in law abiding citizens possesion would not be a danger except to the military. If a criminal wants an automatic weapon he will get it no matter what law is passed. Civillian possesion of automatic weapons are a defence from our own government. You may soon wish you had one.
[A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.]
Liberal says: They were talking about muskets, not weapons of war
God says: I was talking about freedom from tyranny and the ability to throw off lawless, cruel and extreme government.
Idiot Wind says: Yeah, but we the people are scared of firearms and want love peace and harmony! We’ll pray, YOU do the fighting, lightening bolts and all.
Liberal says: Works for US!
God says: You must be talking about my latest weapon, the Laser-Induced Plasma Channel! Got to practice to know how to use it. You did ask!
Idiot Wind says: Yeah, but THAT’S illegal for US to own! And it’s DANGEROUS!
Liberal says: WORKS FOR US!
God Says: It’s your fight, not mine. You holler and scream when these monsters terrorize you, so I gave you … the right… to keep and bear arms. Take it or leave it.
Liberal Says: W-O-R-K-S FOR U-S!!
Idiot Wind says: Chill here blowing through the buttons of my coat. Brrr!
God says: You’re an idiot. It’s a wonder you can even feed yourself.
Liberal says: Hell yes! WORKS FOR US!
I may have to move to Wyoming if Missouri doesn’t follow your lead. Excellent decision to protect the rights of your citizens. Kudos to your legislature.
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
I hold everyone’s feet to the fire equally Michael. Sometimes I think am harder on the liberty movement than I am on the enemy because my whole life I have observed one institution after another being subverted. I care too much about liberty to ever be politically correct.I love what TAC does, and I hope that any criticisms are not misconstrued. It’s all in love Michael. Thanks for holding my feet to the fire on this issue.
@InalienableWrights if it’s all about love, then cool!
I’ll take peace if I can get it…
Doing research about executive orders. Most of them are proclamations (I.e saying that tommorw will be national lightpole day) or rules that deal with different executive agencies(I.e the executive orders by JFK and Johnson prohibiting discrimination in housing and other agencies). However they are backed by the full force of law. If a governor orders a fire ban, you must obey, or be punished. The executive order must not violate the Constitution, and like any law, executive orders can be struck down by courts. Only two executive orders have been struck down by the courts, both were ones signed by William Clinton.
The only executive order regarding firearms is one signed by George H W Bush, which banned the importation of so-called assault weapons.
The most infamous executive order to date is executive order 9066, is the one that required Japanese citizens be sent to internment camps during world war 2.
The Constitution allows for the President to take action by Executive Order, if Congress does not. This state bill/law would be unenforceable. That said, hopefully the Congress WILL act, do its job and enact reasonable regulations concerning the sale/type/ and ammo of guns and who may purchase them and how.
@BrookeDoris Where in the Constitution do you find that? Could you point to the Article, Section and Clause?
@BrookeDoris Would you mind quoting that part of the Constitution that gives the president to authority to take action if Congress does not?
@BrookeDoris BrookeDoris – Congress already has regulations regarding firearms. We do not need any additional restrictions on our 2nd amendment rights.
@MichaelBroadway @BrookeDoris Federal interpretation of ‘… shall not be infringed.” = 2000 restrictions on firearms.
@BrookeDoris Wrong! Executive orders are used by the president to inform his cabinet and agency heads how he wants them to operate in the way he wants them to. These executive orders cannot be used to circumvent the legsilature. These orders cannot make new laws.
@BrookeDoris
Then what is the point in separation of powers? Hmmm…???
@BrookeDoris “That said, hopefully the Congress WILL act, do its job and enact reasonable regulations concerning the sale/type/ and ammo of guns and who may purchase them and how.”
Brooke, the congress HAS been doing its’ job. It has been trying to pass legislation on all matters that come before it. The problem is that not everyone agrees on how the laws are to be written or what laws are needed. The problem is that when one group (liberals or conservatives) gain control of both houses of congress, then they can write any kind of laws any way they want to, despite the protests of everyone else. In this case, if the president and the ruling legislators in both houses are of the same party, then they will have almost ironclad rule and pass what they want. If the president is from the opposing party, then he can veto laws that he disagrees with and it is up to the two branches of congress to over-ride the president. The president has no power to legislate or make laws. He can only sign laws, presented to him by the congress, or veto them.
The current controversy about gun control is the best example right now. The president and his liberals in the Democrat and Republican parties want to ban guns. More conservative Democrats and Republicans think that it is illegal for them to do that, and are fighting to preserve what the constitution rules. The liberals do not like the constitution because it restricts them from becoming overbearing dictators.
@OdellHarwell And yet, it seems that NONE of them have any interest in showing just which part of the Constitution gives them the authority to do ANY of what they do. Wouldn’t that be a hoot if they were required to show such authorization/permission?
@OdellHarwell @BrookeDoris Try th th this for a reality check:
Push everything out of your mind that you’ve been taught about why people aren’t able to process this crisis. I am about to scare the hell out of you. If you think this information might be harmful to you psychologically, don’t read it. If after reading this you haven’t vomited all over yourself, copy and share. See who else is awake. When I say intelligence has been bred down in the US, that’s exactly what I mean. The application is the Cult of Castores, and the institution that is performing this macabre enterprise is the Mormon Church, the latter a British repatriation project. They are literally breeding down intelligence via the black mass, and their sacred numbers are 5, 7, 13 and 3. The way they are doing this is they identify the Eve Novus in their daily treks into the community and target these individuals for abduction. Eve’s carry the evolutionary intelligence that promotes periodic bursts of enlightenment that were they to be left alone intelligence would breed up thus presenting in the Novus and a more significant challenge for the monarchy and other despots. This breeding scheme makes Gods out of the elite, the masses thus bred too stupid to understand this. They’ve been doing this in the US as an intuition since 1888. They’ve chosen two marks for developmental progress on this project, 2011 and 2134. 2011 ripened this project to S.1867.1021, which is essentially occult rendition institutionalized and sets an international legal precedence for at will abductions to resource human sacrifice with “products acquired in the US. They take these young women in tandem, one immediately sacrificed, the other used black mass, or for body parts for some elite aging politician. They eat the remains on the latter. Now magnify the model to 3000 such abductions per year in the US times 100 years. That’s 300,000 renditions. 150,000 immediately sacrificed with 150,000 delivering an infant black mass and handed off to adoptive parents to be used by the Monarchy for the sole purpose of reining control over the masses thus bred down in intelligence for lack of the Eve Novus. The 150,000 that were renditioned black mass were tortured, raped and sacrifice at full term just ahead of the delivery of their infants by having their throats slit and hearts cut out while still alive. The infants in these births are believed to be soulless, the mother dead moments before the child is delivered from her dead body. Obama was caught involved in these circumstances in April 2011, hence he shielded himself with Bin Laden, Schwarzenegger, Oslo/Utoya, the London Riots and OWS. All of this was shock and awe to divert attention away from the core issue of occult rendition to resource BDSM/pedophilia with products acquired in the US. This information lofted concurrent with ITCCS hearings in London regarding the Queen’s involvement in the sacrifice of 10 Canadian aboriginal children in 1964 and Rupert Murdoch’s involvement in the Milly Dowler abduction dumbed down to a phone hacking scandal. what we’re describing here is human trafficking for torture and sacrifice. Obama knows he’s been caught, which is why he increased his security detail. They are currently killing people to suppress this information. Sandy Hook was thrown together like Bin Laden was, and it pushed their gun control agenda ahead 9 years, they realizing they may soon be under siege from the public over kidnapping children in the US. If this goes off, the Mormon church will likewise be attacked, since this is the entity responsible for facilitating in the US on the behalf of the monarchy. The LDS is a black mass repatriation project for the monarchy!
The Constitution allows for the President to take action by Executive Order, if Congress does not. This state bill would be laughed out of the Supreme Court. That said, hopefully the Congress WILL act, do its job and enact reasonable regulations concerning the sale/type/ and ammo of guns and who may purchase them and how.
“(d) Any federal law, rule, regulation or order created or effective on or after January 1, 2013 shall be unenforceable within the borders of Wyoming”.Thanks for the clarification both of you. After reading it for the 20th time I finally agree. :-)I will keep my long held cynicism of anything that the parasite class does. That serves me right 99% of the time. Still looking for the “gotcha” here. There is always one with the parasite class experience has taught me.
@InalienableWrights I like the parasite-disgust, but just don’t point that cynicism at TAC, please!
It doesn’t say “becomes effective on 1/1/2013″ it says “is effective on 1/1/2013″ which would include anything that was effective prior to 1/1/2013 and still effective on 1/1/2013.
Sounds like you should go into politics —- where you can write indecipehable, ambiguous prose.
I don’t see that at all.
It says this in the bill “(d) Any federal law, rule, regulation or order created or effective on or after January 1, 2013 shall be unenforceable within the borders of Wyoming”. That means to me that laws in effect anytime prior to 1/1/2013 and still effective on 1/1/2013 are also unenforceable.
@dmellon correct. it’s done that way to be future proof as well. legal language is weird most of the time.
@dmellon you would be correct if the text stopped at that point. However, if you read it again, you will see that it continues by giving stipulations regarding those laws or regulations as they relate to semi-automatic weapons ownership or registration. Go back and read it and you will see that your statement is not totally correct.
Yes but why in God’s name would you compromise? The State is in the cat bird seat and it’s bloody compromise that got us to the sorry place that we are now in. Is this just rhetoric? “The Constitution. Every Issue, Every time. No Exceptions, No Excuses. “
Passage of the bill is more than a statement; it’s a line in the sand: Wyoming will not let its citizens be intimidated by federal laws http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
I think it’s bull shit to claim that they will follow all gun laws made before 1/1/13 as if they were Constitutional. But somehow magically all those after 1/1/13 are unconstitutional.Don’t get me wrong, the spirit of what they want it to appear that they are doing is great, but the actual implementation looks like a total sell out to any principles at all.
They are saying that it’s OK to violate peoples inalienable rights if you create law before a certain date.
That is a sell out that the NRA would be proud to claim as it’s own.
@InalienableWrights I initially had the same thought, but upon further thought, it may be that they figure “it’s a start” and the rest can be done at a later time. Gotta hope that’s what they’re thinking, anyway.
@Equality 7_2521 @InalienableWrights Equality – you are correct. They can pass this legislation to stop the oncoming train, and then go back and amend if necessary. I don’t agree that our current gun laws are overly restrictive. I really see no need for a fully automatic weapon or a grenade launcher. I think this legislation is an excellent move on the legislature’s part.
@MichaelBroadway @Equality 7_2521 @InalienableWrights
@MichaelBroadway @Equality 7_2521 @InalienableWrights Fully automatic weapons and grenade launchers are illegal and have been for over seventy years! Why do we need to pass new laws again? We don’t! What the libs are doing is calling semi-automatic weapons as “assault weapons” and then trying to ban them! Assault weapons are fully automatic weapons that are used in war by armies! Bazookas from WW II and grenade launchers from the Vietnam war era have always been illegal to own.
@InalienableWrights nope. it refers to all bills that are effective on or after that date – and bills created on or after that date. so that means it deals with all existing.
THIS is how you stand up for the 2nd Amendment. Will Tennessee do the same?
Report: http://bit.ly/UBIkGa
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment Wyoming’s Firearms Protection Act, is “an act relating to firearms; providing that any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit the size of a magazine of a firearm or other limitation on in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming; providing a penalty; and providing for an effective date.” This act nullifies all federal laws made after Jan. 1, 2013.
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment?
If they pass this I am moving to Wyoming. Please keep me posted.
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
I hope to God the rest of our country does this and that if the President tries to stop them that he be impeached. Period. No questions asked. Executive orders are not there for him to make this country his dictatorship, no matter who holds that position.
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
I love Wyoming.
Way to Go Wyoming!!
The State of Wyoming told the Feds and Obama to stick their firearms legislation where the sun don’t shine.
http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2013/Introduced/HB0104.pdf
“Any official, agent or employee of the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains exclusively within the borders of Wyoming shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be subject to imprisonment for not less than one (1) year and one (1) day or more than five (5) years, a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or both.” http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
The Commerce Clause has been grossly perverted to allow congress to regulate almost anything it wants. It took a Constitutional Amendment to reach local incidents of beverage alcohol during Prohibition (18th Amendment). Yet, by the same clause Congress now purports to be able to reach local incidents of drugs, guns, ammunition, etc. Thus, Congress now purports to regulate by statute and judicial fiat what formerly took a Constitutional Amendment. Wyoming’s effort is a good start. The states should be prepared to secede if Congress and the Administration try to restrict ownership of semi-automatic weapons, as these are absolutely essential to preserving our freedom from a tyrannical central government.
@Patrick Henry Lives Well stated.
@Patrick Henry Lives I agree completely.
5 years??? If it were up to me, they’d get the DEATH penalty!
FINALLY a State with some Balls!!!
DEMOCIDE (Death By Government – 292,000,000) – GOOGLE IT!!!
Democide: Murder by Government — University of Hawaii
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/MURDER.HTM
Wyoming Lawmakers Propose ‘Gun Protection’ Legislation
http://k2radio.com/wyoming-lawmakers-propose-gun-protection-legislation/
Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment?
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
In response to current threats from the Federal Government, Wyoming Rep. Kendell Kroeker has sponsored and introduced HB0104, the Firearms Protection Act.
Any federal agent “who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming” would get up to 5 years in prison.
Hey Govener of Arizona . . . Lets Follow with Wyoming!
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
Now if all the states would follow suit.
In honor of Biden’s announcement that gun control will now proceed by executive order, we’re bring back this great Democracy Denied video!
I’m very sorry to say that I live in Illinois, have for over 48 yrs. I would like to see the state cut in half, ( North Illinois and South Illinois ) like N. Dakota an S. Dakota, N. Carolina an S. Carolina. Why do we here in southern Illinois have to be punished for what happens in Cook county?
@Pilgrim43 I understand where you are coming fro. I lived in ILnear Cook Co. it is the heart of corruption. Any politician who comes from Cook Co has no other way to go but corrupt. You can not be an honest politician and be elected. Thank GOD I moved from there more than 50 years ago. However Chicago can not exist without the rest of the states tax dollars. It will be a hard sell.
@Robert kepka Any new gun laws out of Springfield an I’m out of here. Many thanks for your reply, someone who knows what I’m talking about.
“Certain forms of ammunition have no legitimate sporting, recreational, or self-defense use and thus should be prohibited.” -Ronald Reagan – August 28, 1986
“We were disappointed with how little this meeting had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.”
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
ALL STATES NEED TO PASS THIS! THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO TRAMPLE THE RIGHTS OF FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS! THE STATES HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO STOP THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHEN IT SPINS OUT OF CONTROL! PLEASE PASS THIS ON, ESPECIALLY TO ANY STATE OFFICIAL THAT YOU FOLLOW ON FACEBOOK!
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/ http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
Where the federal government is given enumerated power, a state cannot legally annul or override that action. However, when the federal government engages in actions in which it does not have the power to do so, especially if that action violates a right retained by the people, especially if that right is specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights, a state can legally oppose such action. In fact states have an absolute duty to oppose such actions. Everyone should be contacting their state representatives and state senators and demanding that they also pass such a law mandating state protections of the 2nd amendment from federal agencies and authorities. If a federal authority confiscates or tries to infringe on the 2nd amendment, that state should arrest that individual and charge them with a felony.
Sadly, the Obama administration seems determined to roll back 2nd Amendment rights.
THIS is how you stand up for the 2nd Amendment.
Report: http://bit.ly/UBIkGa
Wyoming Activist group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/2ndAmendmentWyoming/
Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? – Tenth Amendment Center Blog
blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
The Tenther Grapevine
COURTESY: CONNIE SHELP
Senator Dianne Feinstein,
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain.
I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012
You have to love the West in this nation……http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
Looks like something will finally backfire on this evil regime. NOTE TO O and thugs: NEXT TIME READ IT BEFORE YOU PASS IT. LMBO
Is the author of this article certain about the wording of part of this bill? The part quoted below looks like nothing more than the law WY passed last year making weapons made _in_Wyoming_, which stay in Wyoming off limits to federal laws, because of the fact that they don’t involve interstate trade. That law, too, had a provision for the imprisonment of anyone attempting to enforce federal laws that conflict with the WY law. If that’s all this is, then they’re not doing anything but passing the same law they already passed last year. Surely that’s not the case. Here’s the quote from the above article:
“Any official, agent or employee of the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains exclusively within the borders of Wyoming shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be subject to imprisonment for not less than one (1) year and one (1) day or more than five (5) years, a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or both.”
@Equality 7_2521 Would you please post a list of Wyoming gun legislation so we can get an idea of what this state is actually doing?
Here’s a look at what’s going ion in DC:
Militia was subsidized by the Militia act of 1903 and National defense act of 1947 in a scheme to divert the 2nd Amendment. The federal government commissioned otherwise able bodied persons to serve drawing fighters into a federal agenda prescriptive of repatriation. Every one else was left to figure things out on their own, and they figure. What remains is a corn fed population that’s stupid as hell, militia enterprisers oathed to the federal government and under threat of death in perpetuity (hanging or firing squad) of they violate their service standards. It’s a racketeering scheme.
@Equality 7_2521 I think the key here is the words “Owned or manufactured……in Wyoming and remains in Wyoming,” So, whether it is a gun or ammo, or accessory, and is owned in Wyoming and remains exclusively in Wyoming, then the state is saying that the feds should butt out!
@OdellHarwell Okay, I see what you’re saying about the “owned” part. I’m sure the feds will attack that part immediately, on anything people own that wasn’t manufactured in wyoming. Even if it doesn’t go back out of the state at any time. – Good for Wyoming though, regardless. It’s about time the states started standing up for the constitution.
@Equality 7_2521 @OdellHarwell yeah, that’s the BIG caveat…the addition. Because previously, they passed a bill about manufacture. now it’s about owning….shows how each step can lead to a bigger one.
@Equality 7_2521
Nope, it says “OWNED OR manufactured” meaning the Federal Government cannot pass any law restricting any personal firearm that stays in Wyoming. Period!
This is BS smoke and mirrors. It ignores the plethora of unconstitutional gun laws already in place. Politicians always compromise and sell you down the river. Either self defense is an inalienable right Wyoming or it isn’t. Make up your minds!
@InalienableWrights it’s smoke and mirrors to ban federal gun laws? weird.
I am OPTIMISTIC about Utah’s energy future. I am EXCITED about Utah’s energy future. And most of all I am CONFIDENT in a future that is filled with collaboration and innovation.
Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment?
In response to current threats from the Federal Government on banning firearms, firearms accessories and ammunition, States are beginning to take action to hold the Federal Government to its constitutional limits under the 2nd Amendment. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
THIS is how you stand up for the 2nd Amendment.
Report: http://bit.ly/UBIkGa
Wyoming Activist group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/2ndAmendmentWyoming/
Wyoming “We The People” salute you.All States should be doing this! It is high time all politicians started abiding by the Constitution that they swore an oath to up hold.
Anyone got a quickie list on states that are SYG?
@coastx What does SYG mean?
@OdellHarwell Stand your ground, and if you want an education and a DHS knocking at your door at 3:30 AM, start talking this over online:
SYG/RPM
HAHAHAHA
MOOO! hahaha
Check this out. http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/130379.html
BREITBART: Second Amendment Foundation Requests Meeting with White House, Denied
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/09/White-House-Pretends-It-Wants-A-Discussion-About-Guns
Liberty is the enemy of Tyranny, Push Back!!
@isabellaliberty You push. We’ll watch!
Might need to move to Wyoming …
Three cheers for Wyoming. I wish Florida had these kind of legislators. We must fight an un American Federal Government. And to get back to the rule of law for our Fed , how about a law that any elected Federal ofice holder or those appointed by them. Who nonigly nd with intent fails to enforce the laws passed by the congress shal be guilty of a felony and serve a manatory 10 years in prison upon conviction.
Sorry about the spelling but you get the idea.
I’m with you all the way.. Texas should have the same bill! I’m sick of our Constitution being crapped on by this sorry administration in the white house.. enough is ENOUGH! If he wants to shove his weight around and keep taking from us.. we need to shove back and HARD..
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/wyoming-to-preserve-the-second-amendment/
THIS is how you stand up for the 2nd Amendment.
Report: http://bit.ly/UBIkGa
Wyoming Activist group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/2ndAmendmentWyoming/
THIS is how you stand up for the 2nd Amendment.
Report: http://bit.ly/UBIkGa
Wyoming Activist group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/2ndAmendmentWyoming/
I am behind you 100%. I think I’d like to see an AZ Chapter of this become a reality.
Sheriffs can do it on their own (ask Sheriff Mack). The legislature can certainly do it if they have the balls. Here in NV, and particularly in Las Vegas, they have will side with the tyrant because they are petty tyrants themselves.
“Vice President Biden would do well to read the 2nd Amendment and revisit the meaning of the phrase ‘shall not be infringed’…bypassing Congress to implement radical policies is never acceptable, and it’s particularly heinous when such actions trample on the freedoms guaranteed to all Americans by the Bill of Rights.”
Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA),
Chairman Republican Study CMTE
January 10, 2013
YES!!!
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
THIS is how you stand up for the 2nd Amendment.
Report: http://bit.ly/UBIkGa
Wyoming Activist group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/2ndAmendmentWyoming/
THIS is how you stand up for the 2nd Amendment.
Report: http://bit.ly/UBIkGa
Wyoming Activist group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/2ndAmendmentWyoming/
I wish they’d said ANY and ALL so-called legislation from our illegitimate government….it’s all unconstitutional. Geeze, why not go for the whole mess?
@RedTulie Red, let’s take it one thing at a time! We need to make sure we concentrate our resources on getting a solid unreversable win before trying to slaughter the whole cow.
@OdellHarwell I agree! But, this whole mess is so long overdue for correction. ;-))
@RedTulie I know!!!! I’m so frustrated that this has been going on since the liberals began this attack at the beginning of the Clinton term. The supreme court hasn’t been much help because we have liberals controlling half of the court. Thankfully we have conservatives protecting the other half. We need to make sure Obama doesn’t get to replace a conservative or the lone moderate with another liberal.
@OdellHarwell @RedTulie The liberal agenda issues on the 11 amendment, and 11- 27 are a parliamentary system having superimposed upon the Bill of Rights for the explicit purpose of circumventing the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Once people understand this, we fade to the Bill of Rights, States nullify and redirect to SYG, which at that time state legislatures form the main body of leadership for a confrontation with the tyrant in toto, which will present in civil war posturing between states. That’s what Obama is going for. It’s a chess game for the monarchy much as it was in 1860. What people have to realize is who the enemy is. At that time, the monarchy was after the cotton trade, but people didn’t know this, not even Lincoln himself, which is Obama’s fixation on this political effigy. It’s LIBERALISM, which is enslavement for humanity and one of the most prolific BSDM/pedophilia schemes ever perpetrated on the public
@RedTulie
Right-On Brother.
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
@TenthAmendment Does Wyoming have nice weather?
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th
RT @TenthAmendment: Wyoming to Preserve the Second Amendment? Bill introduced to #nullify federal gun laws: http://t.co/IqCYu5lL #10th