S.C. Senate Approves NDAA Nullification 25-15

  • Share on Tumblr

COLUMBIA, S.C. (March 19, 2013) – On Tuesday, South Carolina moved a step closer to refusing cooperation with indefinite detention provisions without due process written in to the National Defense Authorization Act.

The Senate passed S.92 by a 25-15 vote. (See the roll call HERE.)

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Tom Davis, forbids any state compliance with NDAA detention provisions.

No agency of the State, officer or employee of this State, solely on official state duty, may engage in an activity that aids an agency of the armed forces of the United States in execution of 50 U.S.C. 1541, as provided by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, or any subsequent provision of this law in the detainment of any citizen of the United States in violation of Section 3, Article I, and Section 14, Article I of the South Carolina Constitution.”

“If states don’t act, the federal government will continue its march over basic individual rights like due process,” Davis said. “It’s the appropriate role of the states to stand against federal overreach, and act as a constitutional check on unlimited federal power.”

Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey praised the South Carolina Senate for passing the bill, noting the power of state non-compliance.

“The feds depend on state agencies and resources to do pretty much everything. Just look at the so-called ‘war on drugs.’ You rarely, if ever, see a report about a federal drug bust that doesn’t say something like, ‘The DEA, in cooperation with state and local authorities…’ If enough states step up and simply refuse to cooperate with federal kidnapping, it will definitely throw up significant impediments and obstacles in their way.”

The bill will now move on to the House for consideration. It has not yet been assigned to a committee.

ACTION ITEMS

1. Contact your state representative. If you live in South Carolina, it’s not too early to contact your representative.  Strongly, but respectfully, urge him or her to support S. 92. You can find House contact information HERE.

2. Encourage your local community to take action as well.  Present the Liberty Preservation Act to your city county, your town council, or your county commissioners.  Various local governments around the country are already passing similar resolutions and ordinances.  Local legislative action present a great way to strengthen a statewide campaign against NDAA indefinite detention

Model legislation here:
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/ndaa

3. Get connected to what is happening in your state on Facebook
Like and get active on the South Carolina Tenth Amendment Center page. Also join the Nullify NDAA group on facebook here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nullifyndaasouthcarolina/

4.  Share this information widely.  Please pass this along to your friends and family.  Also share it with any and all grassroots groups you’re in contact with around the state.  Please encourage them to email this information to their members and supporters.

BACKGROUND ARTICLES AND INFORMATION ON NDAA “INDEFINITE DETENTION”

NDAA: Open Season for the Police State

Scary Potential in Sections 1021 and 1022

Note: while some believe that the 2013 NDAA eliminated indefinite detention, it does not.  Dianne Feinstein introduced a very weak amendment to 2013 – and it failed anyway.  2012 indefinite detention provisions remain in tact – and the Obama administration is aggressively defending them in court.

Also, a case about indefinite detention is still being heard in federal court. Last year, Federal Judge Katherine Forrest struck down these indefinite detention powers as unconstitutional. She issued a temporary court order blocking the use of these powers.  That order was revoked by the appeals court and indefinite detention powers remain while the case is currently on appeal but not decided.

Additionally, when asked by Judge Forrest if the federal government was using indefinite detention in violation of her temporary order blocking it, Barack Obama’s attorneys refused to confirm, leaving the door open that the Feds were potentially using this power in secret, even in outright defiance of an order from the federal courts.

Because of all this, and more, South Carolina stands on strong ground to reject a federal power which has already been struck down in federal court and is still pending appeal.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
88 comments
swildstrom
swildstrom

@declanm The last time South Carolina said it could decide which federal laws applied in the state, it turned out very badly.

TenthAmendment
TenthAmendment

@swildstrom @declanm it did? In 2007, the state passed a law refusing to comply with Bush's Real ID act. It seems to be going ok for them.

swildstrom
swildstrom

@TenthAmendment @declanm I was thinking of the 1820-1861 nullification controversy. We know how that ended. (2\/2)

swildstrom
swildstrom

@TenthAmendment @declanm Only because the unenforceable Real ID act was never enforced, so the issue wasn’t tested. (1\/2)

eachus
eachus

@swildstrom Even if it were "enforceable", how to enforce when 26 states officially refuse to comply? Can't be done. That's nullification.

Isabelle Cochran
Isabelle Cochran

My boyfriend is from NY & I tell him all the time he ain't no Yankee. I'm from TN & he's more redneck than me :)

Isabelle Cochran
Isabelle Cochran

No you don't! You just come on down & drink some Sweet Southern Tea Little Lady & you'll fit in just fine :)

Isabelle Cochran
Isabelle Cochran

Come on down South buddy!! You ain't no Yankee!! You're a certified redneck!!

Daniel Wagner
Daniel Wagner

A Yankee is not a geographic thing, but an enemy of peace and liberty and our culture. So Jeff, you don't sound much like a Yankee to me!

MarkBHopp
MarkBHopp

So is there any penalty for state workers that comply with the feds?

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin moderator

 @MarkBHopp No, but that's a good option to consider if it turns out that state agents start violating this if it passes into law.

 

In Washington State, for example, there's no penalties for cooperating with the feds on marijuana enforcement....they're just standing down.  In fact, within weeks of the initiative passing there, over 300 people were left alone.

Sarah Atkinson Allen
Sarah Atkinson Allen

Tim Wilbanks, if you follow the link to the blog...there is another link to see the roll call for the vote

Jeff Wheeler
Jeff Wheeler

Can I move back to SC? Please? One more yankee isn't going to hurt anything. I believe in God, guns, guts, pulled pork, grits and boiled peanuts. I want to be part of the Confederacy the next time around.

Tim Wilbanks
Tim Wilbanks

This is my home who are the 15 that voted against it time they were made famous and ran out of south carolina

Robert Lyons
Robert Lyons

The typical liberal Dems voted no on this....Nikki Setzkler, Brad Hutto, etc...they need to be voted out next time around.

Judy ForLiberty
Judy ForLiberty

any chance there is a youtube of Williams' testimony?

Allen Jones
Allen Jones

In other states the Constitution upholds the rights of gun owners, in South Carolina gun owners uphold the Constitution

Marcus Ford
Marcus Ford

Awesome!! All the powers that the feds are seizing for themselves belong to the states and after that the people.

Marcus Ford
Marcus Ford

I agree, I would love to see this in every state in the union. Why would we let a few elites run our lives? thats why this country was founded in the first place!

Lorraine Patterson
Lorraine Patterson

Three cheers for South Carolina. I hope they will be an inspiration for the rest of the states.

Jessica E Bullard
Jessica E Bullard

Beth Wallace, it means that the federal government can't take your guns. It means that the federal government cannot change any state laws that are not written in the US Constitution

Patrick Cothran
Patrick Cothran

thats my home state right there!!! which i was living there.

Beth Wallace
Beth Wallace

Jessica E Bullard what does this mean?! Lol

Trackbacks

  1. [...] of the bill, Senator Tom Davis, told the Tenth Amendment Center, “If states don’t act, the federal government will continue its march over basic individual [...]

  2. [...] Tom Davis’ bill in the SC Senate to nullify the NDAA indefinite detention passed by a vote of 25-15. This is a major victory for civil liberties and for [...]