The Vermont General Assembly will consider a “Drone Regulation Act” during the current legislative session. Representative Kevin Christie sponsored House Bill 540, joined by 24 other patriots as cosponsors. Your action is needed to move this bill forward. (more bill details below)
Actions for H540:
1. Please Contact the members of the House Rules Committee. Strongly, but respectfully, let each of them know that you want them to vote YES on H540
Deen (802) 869-3116 email@example.com
Koch (802) 476-4141 firstname.lastname@example.org
Komline (802) 867-4232 email@example.com
Jewett (802) 388-0320 firstname.lastname@example.org
Turner (802) 893-1419 email@example.com
2. Encourage your local community to take action as well. Using model legislation from the Tenth Amendment Center, you can introduce legislation to nullify Drones in your city, town, and county with the Privacy Protection Act .
Model legislation here: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/legislation/privacy-protection-act/
3. Share this information widely. Please pass this along to your friends and family. Also share it with any and all grassroots groups you’re in contact with around the state. Please encourage them to email this information to their members and supporters.
The bill would create a new chapter (205) to regulate drones in Vermont.
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a law enforcement agency shall not use a drone for any purpose or disclose or receive information acquired through the operation of a drone.
Upon a close look at the bill, we find a few points that are essential to the security of a free nation. The bill clearly supports the right to privacy and our expectations that our homes and persons should remain free from unreasonable, unauthorized and/or illegal searches.
Under the proposed law, the use of drones in Vermont will only be permitted by law enforcement agencies after obtaining a warrant, or under specific emergency circumstances. The Department of Public Safety, Municipal Police, Sheriff’s Department, Attorney General’s Office, The States Attorney’s office and the Capitol Police Department will be authorized to use drones, but will strictly be limited to use under specific conditions.Drone operators must avoid data collection on any other person, home or area. Any data gathered that has not been authorized, cannot be used, copied, or disclosed for any purpose. This provision is important in protecting the private property rights of law abiding Vermont citizens.
The new bill further protects the rights of law abiding citizens by prohibiting the use of any facial or other biometric matching technology outside of authorized use. Any identity information of non-target surveillance cannot be admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding. The law would further restrict the use of drones by prohibiting weapons.
Under emergency situations, law enforcement may use drones if there is an imminent threat of death or bodily injury to any person, providing the agency obtains a search warrant for the use of the drone within 48 hours. The law also brings another layer of accountability by requiring reports to be filed. These reports must include a listing of all warrants applied for and issued, including those that are denied. The reports must further list all arrests and convictions obtained through the use of drones. Any and all use of drones by private companies or individuals will be required to follow all federal aviation administration requirements and guidelines.
While the state Privacy Protection Act applies to state and local law enforcement, and not federal drone us, it’s still a strong step forward to protect against federal plans for drone spying around the country. At this stage in the ‘drone game,’ the feds are relying almost solely to get states and local communities to start drone programs. Federal agencies are working hard behind the scenes to get states to operate the drones for them.
In fact, the primary engine behind the expansion of drone surveillance being carried out by states and local communities is the Federal government itself. Department of Homeland Security issues large grants to local governments so that those agencies can purchase drones. Those grants, in and of themselves, are an unconstitutional expansion of power.
In fact, this has been as much as confirmed by a drone industry lobbyist who testified in opposition to a similar bill in Washington State, saying that such restrictions would be extremely destructive to the drone market and industry.
The goal? Fund a network of drones around the country and put the operational burden on the states. Once the create a web over the whole country, DHS steps in with requests for ‘information sharing.’ Bills like these put a dent in this kind of long-term strategy. Without the states and local communities operating the drones today, it’s going to be nearly impossible for DHS plans to – take off.
Latest posts by TAC Daily Updates (see all)
- James Madison on “Parchment Barriers” and the defense of liberty - September 17, 2014
- New Hampshire: A Hotbed for Liberty - September 1, 2014
- James Monroe writes to Thomas Jefferson on State vs Federal Governments - August 27, 2014