In a display of arrogance and racial bigotry shocking even for this administration, President Obama’s Justice Department recently invalidated the will of an overwhelming majority of voters in Kinston, NC, who desired to make local elections non-partisan.

From the Washington Times:

The Justice Department’s ruling, which affects races for City Council and mayor, went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” – identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

The department ruled that white voters in Kinston will vote for blacks only if they are Democrats and that therefore the city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want.

In other words, black voters are too stupid to figure out who represents their values, and white voters are too racist to vote for a black candidate (regardless of values) unless he or she is a Democrat.

Adding insult to injury was Loretta King, the head of DOJ’s Civil Rights division at the time the decision was made:

“Removing the partisan cue in municipal elections will, in all likelihood, eliminate the single factor that allows black candidates to be elected to office,” Loretta King…wrote in a letter to the city.

Talk about perpetuating a culture of paternalism and victimhood. The “single factor” that gets black candidates elected is their affiliation with the race-obsessed Democratic Party?

Is this really what the federal government thinks of the American people?

The article goes on to say that Kinston, which is nearly two-thirds black, supported Barack Obama for president in the same election where the ballot measure eliminating parties passed by a 2-1 margin. Can you say buyers’ remorse?

This is just the latest example of the constitutional abomination that is Section Five of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. And a clear demonstration of why it is so important to restore the balance between state and federal power laid out explicitly by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.

After all, if the actual citizens of Kinston are not permitted to decide for themselves how to elect leaders in their own city, are any of us really free?

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.