In this episode of Thoughts from Maharrey Head, I talk about police militarization.
[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/312945868″ params=”color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false” width=”100%” height=”166″ iframe=”true” /]
Last week, I got an email from the Department of Defense. It was a response to an article I wrote for the Tenth Amendment Center on an Oregon bill to help limit militarization of state and local police. Susan Lowe in the public affairs office of the Defense Logistics Agency took issue with my characterization of mine resistant armored vehicles (MRAPS) as “essentially unarmed tanks.” She called my description “misleading.”
So, why did the DoD bother to write me? I can’t say for sure, but I suspect it has to do with the general backlash against militarized police and the fact that a lot of people have realized, “Hey, it might not be a good idea to give Barney Fife an armored truck and a grenade launcher.”
In this episode I talk about my response to the letter from the DoD, and more generally about the problems with police militarization.
You can subscribe to Thoughts from Maharrey Head for free on iTunes. Just click HERE.
SHOW NOTES AND LINKS
- To the Governor: Utah Bill Would Authorize State Gold and Silver Reserves - February 29, 2024
- Signed by the Governor: Two South Dakota Laws Take Steps Against a Central Bank Digital Currency - February 28, 2024
- Rhode Island House Committee Holds Hearing on Bill to Limit Warrantless Electronic Data Collection and Stingray Surveillance - February 28, 2024