AUSTIN, Texas (May 26, 2023) – This week, the Texas House and Senate gave final approval to a bill to expand the state’s “Right to Try” law, further rejecting Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rules that deny access to experimental treatments.

On Feb. 7, Sen. Tan Parker filed Senate Bill 773 (SB773) on Feb. 6. The legislation is an expansion of the Texas Right to Try law that went into effect in June 2015. Current law enables terminally ill patients to access medications and treatments that do not have final FDA approval. The enactment of SB773 would expand that to enable patients suffering from chronic diseases, rather than only terminal, to access medications and treatments not yet given final approval for use by the FDA.

After different versions of the bill passed both houses of the legislature, it went to a conference committee to iron out the differences. On May 25, the House passed the final version by a 141-1 vote. On Friday, the Senate approved the final measure as well. SB773 now moves to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk for his consideration.

The bill defines “severe chronic disease” as “a condition, injury, or illness that may be treated, cannot be cured or eliminated, and entails significant mental functional impairment or severe pain.” Under the proposed law, the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission would designate specific medical conditions as “severe chronic disease.”

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act generally prohibits access to experimental drugs. However, under the expanded access provision of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 360bbb, patients with serious or immediately life-threatening diseases may access experimental drugs after receiving express FDA approval. Right to Try allows terminally ill patients to bypass the expanded access provision and obtain experimental drugs from manufacturers without first obtaining FDA permission.

Since the Texas Right to Try law went into effect, at least 78 patients in Texas have received an experimental cancer treatment not allowed by the FDA.  If passed, SB773 would expand the Right to Try to patients suffering from chronic illnesses.

SB773 includes provisions similar to those in the current Texas Right to Try law. Specifically, the legislation prohibits state officials from any actions that would prevent the lawful administering of experimental procedures to eligible patients. It reads, in part:

“An official, employee, or agent of this state may not block or attempt to block an eligible patient’s access to an investigational drug, biological product, or device under this chapter” unless it is adulterated or misbranded.

This is important since local law enforcement often works closely with federal agencies to take aggressive actions to stop state programs that aren’t in line with federal law. Including this provision ensures that the “boots on the ground” for law enforcement – the locals, won’t be taking any action to stop sick people from trying new treatments. The feds will have to handle it, and they don’t have the manpower or resources to get the job done.

Healthcare providers are also protected under the bill, with a prohibition against revoking a license or issuing sanctions based on recommendation or issuance of such investigational treatments. Manufacturers of medications and treatments are shielded from legal recourse as well.

Congress passed a federal Right to Try law in 2018 after 40 states enacted laws allowing terminally ill patients to effectively bypass the FDA and try experimental treatments without federal permission.

SB773 expands on the foundation established by Right to Try for terminally ill patients, but it doesn’t go as far as a recent Right to Try expansion in Montana that opened up access to experimental treatments to any patient without any eligibility requirements.

Right to Try expansion demonstrates an important strategic point. Passing bills that take a step forward sets the stage, even if they are limited in scope. Opening the door clears the way for additional steps. You can’t take the second step before you take the first.


Gov. Abbot will have 20 days from the date SB773 is transmitted to his office to sign or veto the bill. If he takes no action, it will become law without his signature.

Mike Maharrey

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.