FRANKFORT, Ky. (Jan. 10, 2025) – A bill introduced in the Kentucky House would effectively legalize raw milk sales in the state, challenging federal restrictions in the process.
Rep. T.J. Roberts filed House Bill 86 (HB86), which would expressly prohibit local governments in Kentucky from banning the sale of unpasteurized milk through laws or administrative regulations. The bill also clarifies that “the sale of unpasteurized milk to a consumer shall not be prohibited” statewide.
Under current law, the sale of raw milk is prohibited in Kentucky. Unpasteurized goat milk may be sold to individuals who have a note from a doctor.
In effect, the passage of HB86 would allow law milk sales subject to the same type of regulatory scheme as pasteurized milk.
The passage of this legislation into law would allow the development of a raw milk market in Kentucky and also take an important step toward further rejecting a federal prohibition scheme in practice and effect.
THE FDAโS POSITION
FDA officials insist thatย unpasteurized milk poses a health riskย because of its susceptibility to contamination from cow manure, a source of E. coli.
The FDAโs position is more than a matter of opinion. In 1987, the feds banned the interstate sale of raw milk for human consumption with the implementation ofย 21 CFR 1240.61(a).
The agency insistsย itย โdoes not regulate the intrastate sale or distribution of raw milk. Whether to permit the sale and distribution of raw milk within a state is for the state to decide.โ
However, the FDA has asserted its authority to regulate raw milk salesย within the borders of a state. In response toย a Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund lawsuitย against the FDA over the interstate raw milk ban, officials wrote,ย โIt is within HHSโs authorityโฆto institute an intrastate ban [on unpasteurized milk] as well.โ
This means the federal government could become more aggressive in regulating or banning raw milk within states at any time.
IMPACT ON FEDERAL PROHIBITION
When states allow the sale of raw milk within their borders, it takes an important step toward nullifying this federal prohibition scheme in practice and effect.
Thatโs because the federal government lacks the personnel and resources necessary to fully enforce federal food laws, as evidenced by state and local cooperation with federal raids on farms. Theย FDA has about 18,000 employees, but theย Office of Criminal Investigationย only has 200 agents to cover the entire U.S.
Imagine a scenario where every state allowed raw milk sales and refused to cooperate with federal enforcement efforts. Itโs clear the feds wouldnโt be able to do much of anything about raw milk sales within the borders of a state or even across state lines.
The reality is that when more people engage in the activity the feds are trying to control, it becomes increasingly difficult for the federal government to enforce its will. Itโs like a freeway where everybody chooses to drive 80 mph. Police become overwhelmed, and enforcement becomes nearly impossible.
Removing state barriers to raw milk consumption, sale, and production would undoubtedly spur the creation of new markets for unpasteurized dairy products, no matter what the feds claim the power to do.
If all 50 states allow raw milk, markets within the states could easily grow to the point that local sales would render the federal ban on interstate commerce null and void in practice and effect.
Simply put, growing markets will quickly overwhelm any federal enforcement attempts.
WHATโS NEXT
HB86 was referred to the Committee on Committees where it will be referred to a standing committee for further consideration.
- The Federal Government is Not the Boss - March 8, 2026
- One Step is a Step Too Far - February 28, 2026
- Freedom Isn’t Granted: It’s Exercised and Defended - February 18, 2026