I understand Jeffrey Lord has another attack on Ron Paul (and me) over at the American Spectator. Naturally this happens when I am about to catch a plane and head to New York for three days of events. I guess he is upset that some people have criticized Reagan. Reagan is evidently the Obama of the right โ€” the infallible savior against whom all criticism is a form of blasphemy and perversion. How dare you say Reagan wasnโ€™t free-market enough! Why, the Supreme Neocon Council has declared that Reagan was exactly the right amount free market! The question is closed, citizen.

Libertarians, Lord complains, donโ€™t unquestioningly wave incense before everyone who uses the words โ€œfree market.โ€ Darn right. We do not wave incense before the pantheon of the gods presented to us by the Americann Spectator or anyone else. Lord thinks this is a defect. Most people, I suspect, would consider it a virtue.

As for Russell Kirk, I think he was unfair to libertarians, but he was merciless on neocons like Lord. I referenced Kirk because we were talking about foreign intervention, and since Lord thinks bringing feminism to Afghanistan is high on the list of conservative imperatives, I thought I would throw a little cold water on the question.

For now, Iโ€™ll remind readers of who won the last exchange. Hereโ€™s the video I made against Lord. He cannot and will not answer my specific arguments because there are no such answers.