Comments on: SD Governor Rounds Signs Firearms Freedom Act into Law

By: Paul

Paul — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:57:10 +0000

This act wasn't necessary, as the federal government can only lawfully regulate INTER-state commerce not INTRA-state commerce.

By: Bob Bain

Bob Bain — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:29:52 +0000

This is great. Every state needs to reassert the its and its citizens sovereignty. Just wondering however, maybe the BATF will be coming in droves arresting manufacturers and or dealers of, for example, automatic weapons, just as the DEA continues to do to state sanctioned sellers of cannabis in other states. Hope not, but I fear it is too late to reign in the beast with legislation alone.

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:12:55 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendment: #10th: SD Governor Rounds Signs Firearms Freedom Act into Law http://bit.ly/cJ8xTX…

By: David Lininger

David Lininger — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:45:04 +0000

Now that several states have passed Firearms Freedom Acts specifying that any firearms manufactured and retained within the state are exempt from Federal regulation, the question arises: Do any of those states actually have such manufacturing? If not, will this perhaps spur such industry?