<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Idaho Governor Signs Firearms Freedom Act into Law&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>Idaho Governor Signs Firearms Freedom Act into Law&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.J. Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>H.J. Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sooner or later the constitutionality of nullification will end up with USSC.    If they validate it it would go a long way towards reestablishing the relationship between the Federal and State Governments.  If they rule against it it will help built popular dissatisfaction with the status-quo  bringing us that much closer to a popular passion for amending the constitution.  Which ever way goes it won&#039;t hurt.  One road is just harder than the other. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooner or later the constitutionality of nullification will end up with USSC.    If they validate it it would go a long way towards reestablishing the relationship between the Federal and State Governments.  If they rule against it it will help built popular dissatisfaction with the status-quo  bringing us that much closer to a popular passion for amending the constitution.  Which ever way goes it won&#039;t hurt.  One road is just harder than the other. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeWestRadio.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeWestRadio.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by Michael Boldin, 10AC [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Michael Boldin, 10AC [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruceb</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>bruceb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If Harwood only wants to force a court case, it&#8217;s my opinion that he&#8217;s wasting his time. Decades of modern jurisprudence leaves it highly unlikely that the courts will suddenly find the original meaning of the Commerce Clause to be the law of the land.&quot; 
 
Highly unlikely or not, challenging the gov&#039;t over-reach will never be a waste of time. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;If Harwood only wants to force a court case, it&rsquo;s my opinion that he&rsquo;s wasting his time. Decades of modern jurisprudence leaves it highly unlikely that the courts will suddenly find the original meaning of the Commerce Clause to be the law of the land.&quot; </p>
<p>Highly unlikely or not, challenging the gov&#039;t over-reach will never be a waste of time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.L. Igo</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>J.L. Igo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posturing to have a USSC ruling on the matter of firearms freedom per the 2nd Amendment is like asking the fox that guards the henhouse to decide upon something that it believes it has the final word upon...you might well expect a ruling not in accord with the Amendment, or rather, out of accord with the case law on the commerce clause, that&#039;s clearly not in accord with our Founders&#039; intentions as expressed in the notes to the Constitutional Convention, Philidelphia and Federalist and Anti-federalist Papers. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posturing to have a USSC ruling on the matter of firearms freedom per the 2nd Amendment is like asking the fox that guards the henhouse to decide upon something that it believes it has the final word upon&#8230;you might well expect a ruling not in accord with the Amendment, or rather, out of accord with the case law on the commerce clause, that&#039;s clearly not in accord with our Founders&#039; intentions as expressed in the notes to the Constitutional Convention, Philidelphia and Federalist and Anti-federalist Papers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artr Phillips</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Artr Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commerce Clause Invalid by Definition: 
 
The true meaning of the commerce clause in our constitution has been compromised by definition.  When our founding fathers incorporated the commerce clause in the constitution the meaning of the word &quot;regulate&quot; was very different than it now has become.  At the time the commerce clause was authored the word &quot;regulate&quot; meant &quot;to make work&quot;, not &quot;control&quot; as it is now deamed to be.  The founding fathers intent was to keep states from placing tarrifs on goods and services provided.  It is simple logic that the framers of the constitution intent was to limit the powers of the federal government, thus allowing &quot;control&quot; of commerce between the states would never have been their intent.  If in fact the meaning of the word &quot;regulate&quot; had meant &quot;control&quot;, which it did not, the individual states would have never ratified it.  States need to reclaim the control of commerce lost to the fed simply because Websters changed the meaning of a word. 
 
respectfully, 
 
Art Phillips 
Constitutional Guard, Texas 
225 Brian Drive 
Pleasanton, Texas 78064 
830-569-2968  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commerce Clause Invalid by Definition: </p>
<p>The true meaning of the commerce clause in our constitution has been compromised by definition.  When our founding fathers incorporated the commerce clause in the constitution the meaning of the word &quot;regulate&quot; was very different than it now has become.  At the time the commerce clause was authored the word &quot;regulate&quot; meant &quot;to make work&quot;, not &quot;control&quot; as it is now deamed to be.  The founding fathers intent was to keep states from placing tarrifs on goods and services provided.  It is simple logic that the framers of the constitution intent was to limit the powers of the federal government, thus allowing &quot;control&quot; of commerce between the states would never have been their intent.  If in fact the meaning of the word &quot;regulate&quot; had meant &quot;control&quot;, which it did not, the individual states would have never ratified it.  States need to reclaim the control of commerce lost to the fed simply because Websters changed the meaning of a word. </p>
<p>respectfully, </p>
<p>Art Phillips<br />
Constitutional Guard, Texas<br />
225 Brian Drive<br />
Pleasanton, Texas 78064<br />
830-569-2968  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legislatura de Idaho pasa la libertad de actuar de armas de fuego</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>Legislatura de Idaho pasa la libertad de actuar de armas de fuego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] La legislatura de Idaho ha pasado el Proyecto de Ley 589 (HB589), la Ley de Libertad de armas de fuego. El Senado votó 27-7 y la Cámara lo aprobó por una votación de 53-15. Ejecutivos esperan que el gobernador Otter para firmar el proyecto en breve, lo que haría el estado del 6 al pasar tiene el acto en el derecho - unirse a Montana, [. . . ] URL del art&#237;culo original http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/ [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] La legislatura de Idaho ha pasado el Proyecto de Ley 589 (HB589), la Ley de Libertad de armas de fuego. El Senado votó 27-7 y la Cámara lo aprobó por una votación de 53-15. Ejecutivos esperan que el gobernador Otter para firmar el proyecto en breve, lo que haría el estado del 6 al pasar tiene el acto en el derecho &#8211; unirse a Montana, [. . . ] URL del art&iacute;culo original <a href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DANGERS of GUN CONTROL of LIBERALS at Desert Conservative &#124; Guns Blog &#124; Colt &#124; 1911</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>The DANGERS of GUN CONTROL of LIBERALS at Desert Conservative &#124; Guns Blog &#124; Colt &#124; 1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center Blog [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act&nbsp;|&nbsp;Tenth Amendment Center Blog [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie Collins</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for Idaho! Anything that id designed to support/strengthen states rights is good by me! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Idaho! Anything that id designed to support/strengthen states rights is good by me! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/idaho-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4060#comment-2600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendment: #10th: Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act http://bit.ly/af5nVr...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendment: #10th: Idaho Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act <a href="http://bit.ly/af5nVr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/af5nVr</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
