<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is the Ultimate Arbiter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/who-is-the-ultimate-arbiter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/who-is-the-ultimate-arbiter/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TAC grapevine &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/who-is-the-ultimate-arbiter/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>TAC grapevine &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4174#comment-2668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Who is the Ultimate Arbiter? [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who is the Ultimate Arbiter? [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Matthews</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/who-is-the-ultimate-arbiter/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4174#comment-2667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True, but with an exception.   Juries are empowered to be fact-finders in most cases (not all).   Assuming a case before the court is one that may be tried before a jury, the case reaches the jury only when there are disputed issues of material fact. 
 
If there are no disputed issues of material fact, then there is no role for the jury.  The judge then decides the case on the law.    
 
Criminal cases work a bit differently. 
 
Good video, just the same. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but with an exception.   Juries are empowered to be fact-finders in most cases (not all).   Assuming a case before the court is one that may be tried before a jury, the case reaches the jury only when there are disputed issues of material fact. </p>
<p>If there are no disputed issues of material fact, then there is no role for the jury.  The judge then decides the case on the law.    </p>
<p>Criminal cases work a bit differently. </p>
<p>Good video, just the same. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
