Minnesota “Dreaming”

  • Share on Tumblr

Steve Timmer, the attorney who posted the video embedded below on YouTube, mocks Tenthers, like Sue Jeffers, talk radio host and candidate for Minnesota State Senate, Krysia Weidell, for advocating nullification. Yet he fails to offer a single convincing argument against nullification. He instead attempts to abuse them, rather than refute them. He loosely paraphrases Andrew Jackson, saying that the seventh president once described nullification bills as “insurrectionist” and “treasonous”. Finally, he claims that nullification will lead to “constitutional anarchy”.

Watch it:

I assume that Steve Trimmer is referring to a sentence in Andrew Jackson’s Proclamation Regarding Nullification, written for him by Edward Livingston, in which he pleads with the people of his native South Carolina:

“Mark under what pretenses you have been led on to the brink of insurrection and treason on which you stand!”

I find it surprising however, that Timmer would actually hold up Andrew Jackson, the President who infamously defied the US Supreme Court in order to carry out his cruel plan of Indian removal, as a way of trying to discredit Tenthers and the theory of nullification, which we support.

Anyway, both Abel P. Upshur and Littleton Waller Tazewell adequately rebutted Jackson’s proclamations. Steve Timmer can read both rebuttals in chapters 9-10 of Tom Woods’ new book, Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century.

Here’s the comment I left in response to Steve Timmer’s YouTube video, minus all the abbreviations and symbols I used in order to keep it under the maximum of 500 characters allowed per comment:

Sorry Steve, states have already used nullification to avoid unconstitutional federal laws many times and will continue to do so in the future. Medical Marijuana is openly dispensed in California in defiance of Gonzales v. Raich. Twenty two states refused to implement REAL ID. The evil Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was neutralized because of nullification. In most cases, nullification works. I’ll side with Jefferson and Weidell over Jackson and Timmer any day. Lawless federal usurpation, NOT nullification, equals constitutional anarchy.

About Derek Sheriff

Derek Sheriff [send him email] is a research analyst for the Tenth Amendment Center. His articles have appeared in various publications, and he writes regularly for the Center on issues related to state sovereignty and nullification. His blog and podcast "Principles of '98" can be found at www.PrinciplesOfNinetyEight.Com. View his Tenth Amendment Center blog archives here, and his article archives here.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
7 comments
Illbee Frank
Illbee Frank

I would have to agree with Philospherking about Anarchy being a state of lawlessness, but if we consider that we are the law, if we govern ourselves by choosing to do what is right, then we will have governence, not anarchy. Roosevelt once said, "Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others."

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

Thanks, I was referring to the constitution which is higher than any law of either state or federal governments. At least that is what says and, as I understand the concept of constitutions, that is how it works. No other law or action can come into conflict with that. They pass a law defining marriage as a man and a woman then, right or wrong, neither the federal or state can pass a law declaring otherwise. That is the true power of the constitution.

Illbee Frank
Illbee Frank

When it comes to "Federal" intrusion, like they forget who they are working for, and we forget that THEY are our servants and WE are the MASTER, then shame on US. We as a PEOPLE need to build stronger communities instead of this "garage door" mentality where most people have of, "leave me alone I don't want to be bothered," and all the while their neigborhood around them is going to pot (no pun intended). It may be that there is so much broken, but if WE start by putting something together in our communities and strive for growth, then at least we would be a step ahead of broken.

Illbee Frank
Illbee Frank

I'm somewhat new to this whole "Law/Politics/etc. thing", but I am no stranger to MY core instincs of MY Rights. When I came to realize that I had bought into this whole de facto "acting" government by applying for one of their "numbers" to get a "job", and then continued on to "apply" for "permission" to travel in an automobile, I had to take a step back and look at the whole picture. Where have all our Rights gone? A permit to fish or hunt? A permit to build a wall or add a window? A fine for home schooling my children? A license to conduct "business" or do what you love to do in exchange for negotiable instruments? Well MY RIGHTS are right here! And no one, I mean no one can take them away from me.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

Licensing otherwise free behavior is completely wrong. Do I need a license to eat...wait...don't give them any ideas. They might do that.

DerekSheriff
DerekSheriff

I think it would be wonderful if more people would leave an intelligent, civil comment under the video on the actual YouTube page. People like Steve Trimmer need to realize that gratuitous assertions about nullification will always be responded to with reason, rather than with retaliation-in-kind!

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

Anarchy is a state a lawlessnes and I ague that those who ignore the HIGHEST LAW OF THE LAND is advocating for constitutional anarchy.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, RichinLiberty. RichinLiberty said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: Minnesota "Dreaming" http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/minnesota-dreaming/ [...]