Arizona Voters Reject Healthcare Mandates

  • Share on Tumblr

November 2nd was set to be an important day for Arizona voters, and they spoke loud and clear when they rejected healthcare mandates by passing Proposition 106. This amends the Arizona Constitution to protect the “right of Arizonans not to participate in any health care system or plan.” It will also protect Arizonan’s “right to spend their own money for health care services in Arizona.”

Prop 106 was the result of the Arizona legislature passing House Concurrent Resolution 2014 (HCR2014) in mid 2009, and comes on the heels of the state recently rejecting other major federal laws – nullifying the Real ID Act of 2005, and passing the Firearms Freedom Act to nullify some federal gun laws and regulations.

HCR2014 has as its basis the following 4 main provisions:

1. Prohibits any law or rule from directly or indirectly compelling any person, employer or health care provider to participate in any health care system.

2. Allows a person or employer to pay directly for lawful health care services without paying penalties or fines.

3. Permits a health care provider to accept direct payment from a person or employer for lawful health care services without paying penalties or fines.

4. Asserts that, subject to reasonable and necessary rules that do not substantially limit a person’s options, the purchase or sale of private health insurance shall not be prohibited.

The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution codifies in law that the federal government is one of limited, delegated powers – and that all powers not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved “to the States, respectively, or to the People.” The founders, during the time of the Constitution’s ratification, made clear that a vast majority of regulatory powers would be left in the states – including social services, agriculture, mining, and more. Click here to read more. Passage of Proposition 106 follows with the founders design – that such decisions over health care would be handled on a state level, as the people determine.

Arizona voters have joined with voters in Oklahoma, who also passed a health care freedom act today, to become the 6th and 7th states to pass similar legislation or state constitutional amendments. They join Virginia, Idaho, Louisiana, Missouri and Utah. And, more than 2 dozen other states are considering similar legislation or state constitutional amendments to do the same. Passage of such bills have raised the question of federal vs state supremacy under the constitution. To resolve this issue, many legislators and governors are supporting lawsuits to affirm the principles of the state laws. But some constitutional scholars, including famed legal theorist Randy Barnett, have indicated that decades of precedent from the supreme court makes such legal challenges difficult, at best.

But that doesn’t mean that the court is right. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, warned us that if the federal government ever were to become the sole and final arbiter of the extent of its own powers, those powers would never remain limited – thus, the reason they advocated for nullification and interposition in those resolutions.

The essential question, then, remains: Will Arizonans stand up for their rights, will they stand behind their decision in support of the Health Care Freedom Act…whether the federal government gives them approval to or not?

*********

CLICK HERE to view the Tenth Amendment Center’s Health Care Freedom Act legislative tracking page

The Tenth Amendment Center has released the Federal Health Care Nullification Act, which directly nullifies the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” on a state level. Click here to learn more.

About Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
6 comments
charleydan
charleydan

What I have found in these laws is the man date for the citizens in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and those that work for government. Then they just fool the rest with deceit that they have to abide. Yes, we have two citizens in this country and one does not have rights from their creator. They are the ward of the state of the Federal government. You can see this in the law books. Even though some of the laws are being omitted and require one to look for the original writing as omitted does not annul or remove the law. It is just omitted from the record at that point.

When taken to court the state lose. Why? Because the law does not apply to the citizens of the states of the union(constitutional citizens), in the first place. Of course so many Americans have signed agreements with the government that they are fixed into their system. They want to except one agreement and reject another. Contracts do not work that way. You take the whole contract or none. The constitution guarantees your rights but once you agree to the Federal you have a contract to live up to.

The state is not much better. I venture to say that all states have taken dole from the Feds and then wonder why they have to abide. They now have to say I do not want your money and we will stand on our own. When that happens the Fed will be cut off and the citizens of that state freed. But tell me a state, rather, an individual that will cut himself of all the Federal handouts? FHA loans, Ag loans, SS retirement, disability, unemployment, cheap loans for buying green and the list goes on.

In parting let me leave a quote from one of our forefathers, Samuel Adams, "“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”

This is the problem with America. Those that hold government jobs think their job is important because it pays good, while it bleeds liberty. Then bankers, trucking companies, car manufacturers, and the list goes on in commercial well fare. Every one wants a piece of the pie or wants congress to do something. When in reality congress should do nothing. In freedom each individual is to be responsible to himself, period. Government is to be despised.

We can thank our dear selves for the mess we are in by always saying, government needs to do something? Well, they have and you got it. Sorry that dictators get to do it their way as you vote in a mob fashion that congress can divide.

If you want freedom and liberty. Do it for yourself and just refuse government. I thought so, you want your next hand out with printed money.

In the early 1900's the Social Security Card was volunteered into for retirement benefits. On the back of the card it stated the money could be used for other government entities and not just retirement. So if it is volunteer why is it so manatory for so many today? IRS strong arm? Deception of people believing they must sign up? Lack of individual courage? I encourage all to study the law as tedious as it is. You will have your eyes opened to deception by the Congress and their many laws that are dictated to us by the people who hold our loans. The Federal Reserve boys.

Jeff King
Jeff King

I am all for The Goverment staying out of my business. I paid health care for my workers and family for years. When I got cancer my Insurance Co. cancelled me . I have contacted everyone ,they just found a loop hole. I had no problems until the bills started adding up. Cancer is gone but they re-called all insurance payments and now I owe them. I still need 2 more operations on my face for cosmetic reasons. My right cheek is horrible. I am now out of money and no where to turn. Like I said I am anti-goverment . They won't help either but what can I do ?

DerekSheriff
DerekSheriff

It will be interesting to see how this is going to play out in 2011. There will be a great temptation for our state officials to just knuckle under, if and when the federal courts rule against Arizona in favor of the feds, as they most often do. However, unlike many states, the people of Arizona have it within their power to recall elected state officials from office if they fail in their duty to resist unconstitutional federal "laws".

medical assistant
medical assistant

I think the health care in a done deal. There isn't much republicans can do

DerekSheriff
DerekSheriff

It's really not about what Republicans can do, it's about what states can do when they simply refuse to implement unconstitutional federal laws and do what is well within their authority to impede or even block enforcement of such "laws". It's been done successfully many times throughout American history and even more recently with REAL ID and medical marijuana. May I suggest you check out my article, "Nullification In One Lesson"? You can read it here:
http://principlesof98.blogspot.com/2010/10/nullif...

Jerry Silovich
Jerry Silovich

i wished more states would pass mandate or nullification of Obamacare now states with democrat govenors dont want move

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Source 1 and Source 2 VN:F [1.9.6_1107]please wait…Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast) [...]

  2. [...] reported by Michael Boldin on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. … Arizona voters have joined with voters in Oklahoma, who also [...]

  3. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter and Kiowah, Kiowah. Kiowah said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: Arizona Voters Reject Healthcare Mandates http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/11/arizona-voters-reject-healthcare-mandates/ [...]