<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Carolina Secession: The Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:08:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Santorum Sounds Like Rachel Maddow on Nullification &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/#comment-3850</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Santorum Sounds Like Rachel Maddow on Nullification &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6028#comment-3850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] By the way, the Nullification Crisis in South Carolina did NOT &#8220;lead to the civil war&#8221; as so many idiots claim. That happened almost 30 years prior. Read about it here. And, when the South seceded, it wasn&#8217;t an expansion of their nullification efforts. South Carolina&#8217;s complaint &#8211; which led to their secession was because of the NORTH using nullification. The secessionists were opposed to the nullifiers. Read about that one here. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By the way, the Nullification Crisis in South Carolina did NOT &#8220;lead to the civil war&#8221; as so many idiots claim. That happened almost 30 years prior. Read about it here. And, when the South seceded, it wasn&#8217;t an expansion of their nullification efforts. South Carolina&#8217;s complaint &#8211; which led to their secession was because of the NORTH using nullification. The secessionists were opposed to the nullifiers. Read about that one here. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idaho House Rejects Federal Control of Health Care &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/#comment-3849</link>
		<dc:creator>Idaho House Rejects Federal Control of Health Care &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6028#comment-3849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] act, rendering that law so difficult to enforce that when South Carolina seceded a few years later, their top complaint was about northern state actions to nullify slave [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] act, rendering that law so difficult to enforce that when South Carolina seceded a few years later, their top complaint was about northern state actions to nullify slave [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LetTexasSecede</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>LetTexasSecede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6028#comment-3848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The North didn&#039;t fire first chesty.... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The North didn&#039;t fire first chesty&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChestyPullerFan</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>ChestyPullerFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6028#comment-3847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But for the north to invade the south and bring every man woman and beast to the sword isn&#039;t in keeping with being &quot;The Great Emancipator&quot;. It&#039;s more in keeping with &quot;The Great Caesar&quot;. Most citizens in the south were either ambivalent or slightly against slavery, since it cut into their chances of &quot;share cropping&quot;. No, If the north wanted to punish the true adherents to slavery, they would have economically attacked the wealthy slave owners directly. By invasion they stirred up the cause of home defense; and by the carpet baggers and repressive taxes and confiscation of personal property &amp; animals they showed themselves the unrighteous locusts they were. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But for the north to invade the south and bring every man woman and beast to the sword isn&#039;t in keeping with being &quot;The Great Emancipator&quot;. It&#039;s more in keeping with &quot;The Great Caesar&quot;. Most citizens in the south were either ambivalent or slightly against slavery, since it cut into their chances of &quot;share cropping&quot;. No, If the north wanted to punish the true adherents to slavery, they would have economically attacked the wealthy slave owners directly. By invasion they stirred up the cause of home defense; and by the carpet baggers and repressive taxes and confiscation of personal property &amp; animals they showed themselves the unrighteous locusts they were. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philosopherking</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosopherking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6028#comment-3846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with that but you can&#039;t ignore the slavery issue in the debate and the fact that northern states used state&#039;s rights to protect runaway slaves finally takes state&#039;s rights out of the shadow of the slavery issue.  It now has the moral highground in the debate which is something it didn&#039;t have when it was used by the south to leave the union. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that but you can&#039;t ignore the slavery issue in the debate and the fact that northern states used state&#039;s rights to protect runaway slaves finally takes state&#039;s rights out of the shadow of the slavery issue.  It now has the moral highground in the debate which is something it didn&#039;t have when it was used by the south to leave the union. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Utley</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/#comment-3845</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Utley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6028#comment-3845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with the basic premise of this article. I think the reason South Carolina seceded was listed here best:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/ordnull.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/ordnull.a...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
The author of the &quot;causes for secession&quot; focuses on the compact theory of the constitution and then on the failure of the states to comply to that re: slavery. However, this does not encompass all of the reasons, nor the most important reason for secession. Just like abolishing Obamacare doesn&#039;t encompass all of the reasons, nor the most important reason for nullification. Slavery was the hot-button issue for this particular author, but the reality is it was the economy-stifling tariffs that had made all Southerners slaves to the federal government. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the basic premise of this article. I think the reason South Carolina seceded was listed here best:  <a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/ordnull.asp" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/ordnull.a" rel="nofollow">http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/ordnull.a</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>The author of the &quot;causes for secession&quot; focuses on the compact theory of the constitution and then on the failure of the states to comply to that re: slavery. However, this does not encompass all of the reasons, nor the most important reason for secession. Just like abolishing Obamacare doesn&#039;t encompass all of the reasons, nor the most important reason for nullification. Slavery was the hot-button issue for this particular author, but the reality is it was the economy-stifling tariffs that had made all Southerners slaves to the federal government. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention South Carolina Secession: The Truth – Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/south-carolina-secession-the-truth/#comment-3844</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention South Carolina Secession: The Truth – Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6028#comment-3844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter and others. TenthAmendmentCenter said: #10th: South Carolina Secession: The Truth http://bit.ly/h2tQ21 [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter and others. TenthAmendmentCenter said: #10th: South Carolina Secession: The Truth <a href="http://bit.ly/h2tQ21" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/h2tQ21</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
