Defending the Guard in New Hampshire

Soon, the New Hampshire General Assembly will vote on a resolution on the use – and misuse – of the State’s National Guard troops. HJR21 “A RESOLUTION informing the United States Congress that it is the desire of the general court of New Hampshire that the New Hampshire national guard shall not serve outside the borders of New Hampshire absent a declaration of war.”

Good intentions here, for sure. Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16 control the organizing, arming, and disciplining of these units as well as when they can be called for for federal duty.

In Article 1, Section 8 Congress Shall have the power…

Clause 15 – To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Clause 16 – To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

In 1903, under the Congressional power to “organize” the Militia, Congress named those units Constitutionally-authorized to be called for federal duty under Clause 15, the “National Guard.” But, even with this new, and misdirected name, they still remain under control of the individual states except in those instances delegated to the federal government in Clause 15.

So, while HJR21 gets it close as a Constitutional principle, Guard troops would stay in the state even with a Declaration of War from Congress – unless the need was a foreign army threatening to enter the borders of the United States. But, since a Declaration hasn’t happened – as it should – since World War II, the practical effect would be the same. New Hampshire’s national guard troops (and every other state for that matter) should be recalled to their states – now.

A better option than petitioning and begging Congress to do what’s right – which they almost never do – would be to pass the Tenth Amendment Center’s Defend the Guard Act, which puts these ideas into law. It is an act “FOR the purpose of requiring the Governor to withhold or withdraw approval of the transfer of this State’s National Guard to federal control in the absence of an explicit authorization adopted by the Federal Government in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Federal Government in Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 of the U.S. Constitution.”

Read the bill in its entirety at this link:
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/legislation/defend-the-guard/

Track states that have considered the bill in recent legislative sessions here”
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification/defend-the-guard/

And please, send this to your state reps – firmly telling them that you want to see it introduced in your state!

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

18 Responses to Defending the Guard in New Hampshire

  1. FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 12:04 pm #

    @TenthAmendment Have a great day!

  2. FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 12:04 pm #

    @TenthAmendment Have a great day!

  3. TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 11:55 am #

    @FederalistNo84 we probably have plenty!

  4. TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 11:55 am #

    @FederalistNo84 we probably have plenty!

  5. FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 11:38 am #

    @TenthAmendment So we might have some agreement after all. Really glad to hear it!

  6. FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 11:38 am #

    @TenthAmendment So we might have some agreement after all. Really glad to hear it!

  7. TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 11:33 am #

    @FederalistNo84 true. Not a good act in general, but part of A1S8C16. Worst part? Calling state militia troops “National”

  8. TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 11:33 am #

    @FederalistNo84 true. Not a good act in general, but part of A1S8C16. Worst part? Calling state militia troops “National”

  9. FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 11:20 am #

    @TenthAmendment I’ll take a look at the act. I also noticed the date, 1903. Progressive era?

  10. FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 11:20 am #

    @TenthAmendment I’ll take a look at the act. I also noticed the date, 1903. Progressive era?

  11. TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 8:52 am #

    @FederalistNo84 1903 Dick Act, Congress used it’s power to “organize” the militia under A1S8C16. Also, unrelated to 2nd amendment.

  12. TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 8:52 am #

    @FederalistNo84 1903 Dick Act, Congress used it’s power to “organize” the militia under A1S8C16. Also, unrelated to 2nd amendment.

  13. TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 8:52 am #

    @FederalistNo84 1903 Dick Act, Congress used it’s power to “organize” the militia under A1S8C16. Also, unrelated to 2nd amendment.

    • FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 11:20 am #

      @TenthAmendment I’ll take a look at the act. I also noticed the date, 1903. Progressive era?

    • TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 11:33 am #

      @FederalistNo84 true. Not a good act in general, but part of A1S8C16. Worst part? Calling state militia troops “National”

    • FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 11:38 am #

      @TenthAmendment So we might have some agreement after all. Really glad to hear it!

    • TenthAmendment January 9, 2012 at 11:55 am #

      @FederalistNo84 we probably have plenty!

    • FederalistNo84 January 9, 2012 at 12:04 pm #

      @TenthAmendment Have a great day!

Leave a Reply