SALT LAKE CITY, March 13, 2014 – Today, the Utah legislature gave final approval to a bill which would severely restrict the use of drones by law enforcement within the state.
Senate Bill 167 (SB167) was passed through the House by a 67-5-3 vote on Thursday. It had previously passed the Senate by a 23-0-6 vote on Mar. 6. The bill is now headed to the governor’s desk where it is expected to be signed into law.
The bill, known as the “Government Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Act,” states that ‘a law enforcement agency may not obtain, receive, or use data acquired through an unmanned aerial vehicle unless the data is obtained pursuant to a search warrant; in accordance with judicially recognized exceptions to warrant requirements; or from a person who is a non-government actor.” It also requires state government agencies to report their drone use to the public.
SB167 would allow a non-governmental actor to share private information gathered by drones with law enforcement if “the data appears to pertain to the commission of a crime; or the nongovernment actor believes, in good faith, that: the data pertains to an imminent or ongoing emergency involving danger of death or serious bodily injury to an individual; and disclosing the data would assist in remedying the emergency.”
Connor Boyack of the Libertas Institute noted that drones would still be available for use in situations where they could be helpful. “Drones offer law enforcement officers an important tool for search and rescue efforts, accident surveillance, and other scenarios where exigence demands the ability to remotely and easily deploy such a device,” he said.
At the same time, though, Boyack pointed out that passage of SB167 was necessary to stop potential misuse. “Because of their size and ease of use, they also have a high potential for abuse in surveilling innocent individuals and encroaching upon a person’s privacy,” he continued.
“While these tools should remain available to use when necessary, their proliferation should be discouraged by requiring a judge to sign off on a warrant and ensuring that the law provides for appropriate protections to minimize this potential for abuse. Senate Bill 167 accomplishes this and also includes reporting requirements so Utahns can better understand, in the years ahead, how this emerging technology is being used in our communities.”
In addition to limiting drone use by state and local government, the bill will have a serious impact on intended results being pushed by the federal government. At this stage in the deployment of drones around the country, the feds are working behind in scenes in many situations to encourage states to operate the drones. In fact, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has often issued significant funding grants to local governments so that those agencies can purchase drones.
Tenth Amendment Center national communications director Mike Maharrey pointed out that banning states from using drones will thwart federal spying plans as well. “The plan is pretty clear,” he said. “The feds provide grants to buy drones, and once state and local agencies around the country are operating them, all that the federal spies need to do is invoke information-sharing programs under the PATRIOT Act, and they’ve got a network of spies flying everywhere. When states ban their use without a warrant, this kind of future plan is unlikely to ever take off.”
Take steps to protect privacy rights in your state from drones by clicking HERE.
Latest posts by Shane Trejo (see all)
- Wisconsin Legislator Plans to Introduce Raw Milk Bill for 2016 - November 24, 2015
- New Hampshire Committee Approves Bill to Curb “Policing for Profit” via Asset Forfeiture, Federal Loophole Remains - November 17, 2015
- Massachusetts Bill to Facilitate the Production and Distribution of Raw Milk Receives Committee Hearing - November 11, 2015