Adam Serwer at the American Prospect writes:

Recently, Cato’s C. Bradley Thompson wrote about neoconservatism, saying that neoconservatives “are and always have been, by contrast, defenders of the post–New Deal welfare state.” Other than David Frum, I’m not aware of too many conservatives who have offered forceful defenses of the New Deal welfare state. Rather, as neoconservatism has become the dominant foreign-policy ideology of the Republican Party, there’s been a hybridization of neoconservative foreign-policy aggressiveness with more traditional conservative hostility toward social insurance. As a result, America’s war expenses have become an untouchable driver of deficits that provide pretext for dismantling the welfare state.

Serwer is right about the neocons’ attachment to the military budget and foreign intervention, though he leaves out the Democrats’ record on this very issue — contrary to the usual neocon complaint, the Democrats have not in fact sought to “gut” the military.  Neither the Clinton nor the Obama record suggests any such thing.  It’s one big, corrupt system that we are tricked into thinking involves two diametrically opposed parties.

Also, Serwer, like most leftists, is dead wrong when it comes to Republicans and social welfare.  He genuinely thinks they want to repeal the welfare state.  They have shown zero interest in doing anything of the kind.  Under Newt Gingrich in the 1990s, GOP Medicare reform meant increasing spending by 6% instead of 7.5% per year.  That meant a difference in monthly premiums by 2002 of a whole five dollars.

Irving Kristol, the godfather of neoconservatism, was well known for his support of the welfare state.  Likewise for George Will.  I’ll put it this way: when was the last time a neocon called for an actual cut — a real cut, not a first-derivative cut — in the welfare state?  The Left has this view that the neoconservatives — who to them are the only Right that exists or is worth speaking of — are just waiting for the chance to eliminate the welfare state.  This is serious delusion, but it is practically universal on the Left.

Serwer, unlike many progressives, has taken the Obama White House to task for some of its betrayals, so I am not nominating him for Worst Guy in the World.  Just for Conventional Thinker.

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.