I confess to a several personal emotions in reaction to the Elizabeth Warren case.

Elizabeth Warren, if you recall, is the Harvard Law Professor now running for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts who identified herself to her employers and in law school directories as Native American. But it turns out that she has at most 1/32 Indian ancestry, and even that much can’t be verified.

First emotion: “I get it!”

Anyone who has been a law professor (as I was for 25 years) can understand the incentives for this kind of prevarication. Most law professors want to move up the professorial/professional ladder, and it’s a lot easier to do so these days if you can claim minority affiliation. It is very tough for white law professors to jump to higher-ranked schools (particularly males).

This is not speculation. At the point in my career when I was working my way up, faculty and officials at schools for which I was well-qualified admitted they were, as one hiring committee member phrased it, “Not in white male hiring mode.” After an especially egregious episode at another law school, I even went to the EEOC. But I never filed a claim because I knew it would absolutely terminate any hope of academic advancement.

Second emotion: Outrage. Professor Warren claims she didn’t tell Harvard about her purported Indian ancestry until after she was hired. But her credibility is shot; so assuming this is another untruth, it helps explain why Harvard—a school that does not commonly hire faculty with degrees from middle-level law schools like Rutgers—employed her. In one hire it gave them a double-jump forward in the “diversity” game: minority and female.

Third emotion: Wistfulness. With an Indian great-great grandmother (that makes me 1/16 Native American) and a father of Hispanic-Jewish extraction, I probably have more claim to minority status than does Elizabeth Warren. But I never asserted minority status. Partly this was philosophical, but partly it was because I thought doing so would be ridiculous. Maybe I was wrong on latter point, because an even weaker claim proved sufficiently non-ridiculous to work well for Professor Warren’s career. After all, she wound up her academic life at Harvard, served in the White House as one of the President’s czars, and may yet be elected to the U.S. Senate. Not bad.

Fourth emotion: Relief—that I’m out of legal academia, and in the private sector working with people who judge people on their merits and don’t accept government funds.

Rob Natelson

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.