by Jack Hunter

When I used to blast President Bush for being the most big government president in history at that date, my fellow conservatives would remind me that โ€œBush kept us safe.โ€ In other words, despite doubling the Department of Education through No Child Left Behind, giving us the largest entitlement expansion since Lyndon Johnson with Medicare Plan D, TARP, bank and auto bailouts, and the doubling of our national debtโ€”Bush should still be considered a success for preventing another 9/11 from occurring. Never mind that 9/11 happened on Bushโ€™s watch. Never mind that by these parameters it could also be said that Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter โ€œkept us safe.โ€ What matters is that many Republicans still retain and defend this narrative, or as Governor Jeb Bush reminded his party of his brother during this yearโ€™s Republican National Convention: โ€œDuring incredibly challenging timesโ€ฆ he kept us safe.โ€

Now, Barack Obama โ€œkeeps us safe.โ€ As of this writing, the final presidential debate, a foreign policy debate, has yet to take place. But if this yearโ€™s Democratic National Convention gave us any idea of what to expect, the President can not only brag that he has prevented another 9/11 from taking place during his watch, he can make the biggest boast of allโ€”Obama killed Osama.

Using the โ€œBush kept us safeโ€ logic, Mitt Romney shouldnโ€™t even be running right now and Republicans should be rewarding Obama with their vote. But this is not happening, to say the least. Conservatives accuse Obama of being a disaster, and by most conventional measuresโ€”unemployment numbers, tax increases, skyrocketing spendingโ€”Obama has been a disaster. The bureaucratic nightmare ObamaCare poses could dwarf Bushโ€™s entitlement expansions while also wrecking American healthcare. Obama has given us economic stimulus that didnโ€™t stimulate and promised โ€œchangeโ€ that has yet to materialize. Even on the issues that once animated the Left so angrily against Bushโ€”foreign policy and civil libertiesโ€”Obama has only given us more war, spying and drone strikes.

Obama just might be the worst president in American history. Still, โ€œhe kept us safe.โ€

Such jargon is a study in partisanship. By any rational assessment, Bush was a disaster for conservatives, if limited government icons like Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan still have any claim on that label. Likewise, with the arguable exception of ObamaCare, liberals really donโ€™t have much tangible to cheer for Obama over. Yet Republicans and Democrats rationalize their respective leadersโ€™ record as successful based on premises both conservatives and liberals would reject if detached from the personalities involved. Ask most Republicans: โ€œWould you support a Republican president who made Bill Clinton look conservative?โ€ You would get a resounding โ€œno.โ€ Ask most Democrats: โ€œWould you support a Democratic president who made Dick Cheney look liberal?โ€ You would probably get an even more resounding โ€œno.โ€

But majorities of Republicans and Democrats do support them. Vociferously. It is their team. It is partisanship over philosophy, politics over principle, faith over fact.

In their foreign policy debate, the best arguments Obama could possibly use against Romney will be rhetoric rooted in the Bush-era. โ€œObama kept us safeโ€ coupled with flouting his killing of Bin Laden is a foreign policy Romney will find hard to convince most Americans is โ€œweak.โ€

But what it does force at least conservatives to acknowledge is that the lack of a terrorist attack on American soilโ€”measuring success by what hasnโ€™t happenedโ€”is not only a bizarre method of judging but certainly not good enough to excuse the rest of the Presidentโ€™s record.

Imagine a husband and father who manages to feed and shelter his family, but who also cheats on his wife, ignores his children, depletes his savings, racks up massive debt and leaves his family with an uncertain future. Still, he somewhat protected his family for the time being. No one would think him a good husband, father or man. That no physical harm was done to his family would not be good enough.

The government is not, or should not, be our keeper, but if the best praise we can give presidents is that they โ€œkeep us safe,โ€ we exhibit the mindset of children. We are essentially giving leaders credit for nothing happeningโ€”while allowing this praise to obscure what they do that is demonstrably horrible.

Obama is demonstrably horrible. But he did keep us safe. So what?