After an embittered presidential election, a never-ending kabuki on Washington finances, and now a fierce debate over property rights, many would be surprised to know that members from opposite sides of the political spectrum have found some common ground. Betsy Woodruf at National Review Online sure was. She was shocked to find agreement between the Republican Governor of Illinois, Mitch Daniels, and Tom Dickenson of Rolling Stone magazine regarding medical marijuana and federalism. Both, it seems, favor letting the states determine their own drug policy, even though they may not agree on what each state ultimately decides.

First, note that agreement between the two parties happens more often than not. In principle they all agree on war, debt, entitlements, taxation, police statism, drones, the central bank, socialistic healthcare, prohibition, and many other issues. Of course they disagree on just how much debt there should be; if the military ought to bomb the people of third-world countries or drop bombs and machine-gun them; and whether individuals should forfeit 35 percent of their income or only 33 percent. Some diversity of thought.

But what’s noteworthy about this particular case is that each can agree because neither is trying to force the other into submitting to a single policy. Here we see one of the great things about decentralized government: it tends to reduce conflict by allowing various groups to “live and let live.” This is isn’t possible when all policy decisions are made by one body, when a polity becomes too big.

As the power of the state becomes more centralized, those living within its borders are forced to live under one legislative dictate. This works well enough for (mostly) uncontroversial issues such as laws prohibiting murder and burglary, mainly because most everyone recognizes these as actual crimes. But as soon as one group tries to force its views of say, marriage, how the earth was formed, or criminalize vices, conflict arises.

This is because the state is an institution predicated on force, and its laws are executed under threat of violence. When you remove choice from a situation – which is what centralized government does – the natural tendency is for individuals to push back. Unfortunately, too often both sides end up wrestling for control over the same political body, rather than respecting each other’s position and agreeing to disagree.

The debate over gay marriage demonstrates this well enough. Here you have many social liberals who want a nationally recognized right to gay marriage, and social conservatives are just as enthusiastic over an amendment to prohibit gays from tying the knot. The very notion that marriage ought to be left to smaller political bodies or, heaven forbid, religious institutions and the individual parties involved, is rarely considered.

So again, decentralization fosters peaceful coexistence because it allows for greater individual freedom; centralization crushes this freedom, and leads to unrest and social turmoil.

Joel Poindexter
Latest posts by Joel Poindexter (see all)

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.