Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution states that “The Congress shall have the power… to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization.” It does not give exclusive control over migration to the National Government. It is only entrusted with establishing a uniform rule of naturalization.

This is meant to be a check against the states, as it ensures that one state can not offer citizenship at a lower requirement than another state simply to entice alien friends to migrate to their particular state.

Before we proceed further, we must define naturalization, migration and what it means to be an alien. For this, I will use source material from the time of the Founders.

Samuel Johnston’s A Dictionary of the English Language of 1755 defines these as such:

Naturalization- The act of investing aliens with the privileges of native subjects.

Migration- Act of changing residence, removal from one habitation to another.

Alien- Foreign, or not of the same family or land; a foreigner; not a denison; a man of another country or family; one not allied; a stranger.

So then, a naturalized person is one who has followed the laws and has become a legal citizen guaranteed the right to all benefits. An alien is one who is not naturalized and therefore not a citizen and not guaranteed ANY benefits. Consequently, the National Government only has the power to establish the rules for naturalization and NOT to dictate to the states their policies regarding aliens. Simply put, the states then determine who is an alien friend and enemy.(10th Amendment)

Each individual, sovereign state would dictate from what countries aliens were allowed the migrate from, how long they could stay inside the state, if they could use the educational system and what, if any benefits would be conferred. This would include social programs aliens may be able to access, such as medicaid, social security benefits, and welfare benefits. I understand that some court cases will be used to refute this idea, such as Plyler v. Doe that granted ALL aliens the right to education, but this is judicial fiat made by activist judges, not solid law based on the original meaning of the Constitution.

A return to the founding generation’s ideals would permit California, for example, to set up a program wherein they allow a certain amount of alien friends to stay for a period of months to pick fruits and then return home, or North Dakota to allow alien friends to help with oil production and stay for a longer period of time(say two years). Each state would also have a system by which an alien can declare the intent to become naturalized, at which point, the National Government’s power, granted to it by the several states through the Constitution, would then apply. States would also have each alien friend documented within their state and could issue them identification stating their alien friend status.

So, you ask, how am I a dreamer? I am a dreamer because I seem to be in a very small group of people of like mind. All issues currently plaguing us can be solved easily if we remove the emotion and the fallacious arguments from our discussions and focus solely on what the Constitution directs.

I dream of a time when others use rational discourse and factual evidence to win an argument instead of name calling and emotional pablum. I dream of a time when people return to practicing the axiom of a wrong is a wrong, even if everyone agrees with you. A man can dream, can’t he?

*For an excellent book on the Biblical definitions and laws regarding this issue, please read, James K. Hoffmeier’s The Immigration Crisis: Immigrants, Aliens and the Bible. It isn’t relevant to the United States Constitution, so I couldn’t include it here, but I read it prior to writing the article and found it most enlightening.