SACRAMENTO, Ca. (May 23, 2015) – On the same day that Pres. Obama announced his plan to supposedly curb federal transfers of military equipment to local police, the California state Assembly passed a bill that would create a mechanism to stop such transfers no matter what action the federal government may take.

Introduced by Asm. Nora Campos (D-San Jose), Assembly Bill 36 (AB36) would “prohibit a local agency from receiving surplus military equipment….unless the legislative body of the local agency votes to approve the acquisition at a regular public meeting held pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act.“ It passed in the state Assembly on May 18 by a 56-12 vote.

This bill sets the foundation for local communities to stop federal militarization programs.  Via the Pentagon’s 1033 Program and funding programs from the DHS and elsewhere, the federal government provides local law enforcement, at little or no cost, aircraft, armored vehicles, automatic weapons, night vision equipment and more – originally intended for use on the battlefield.

“Due to recent events of police brutality, distrust between law enforcement and many of our communities remains at an all-time high,” said Campos. “Further exacerbating the issue is the recent militarization of law enforcement agencies and a movement away from community policing across the nation.”

Currently, these military transfers happen directly between the feds and local police, as if they make up part of the same government. If passed into law, AB36 would interpose local government in the process, giving the people of California the power to end these federal programs on a community-by-community basis. At the least, it would force the process into the open.

“This is an important first step,” said Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey. “Federal influence and control over local police has cause serious problems in this country, and the best response to this nationalization is to start bringing the decision-making closer to home, and the people it effects.”


Almost 13,000 agencies in all 50 states and four U.S. territories participate in the military “recycling” program, and the share of equipment and weaponry gifted each year continues to expand. In 2011, $500 million worth of military equipment was distributed to law enforcement agencies throughout the country. That number jumped to $546 million in 2012.

Since 1990, $4.2 billion worth of equipment has been transferred from the Defense Department to domestic police agencies through the 1033 program, in addition to various other programs supposedly aimed at fighting the so-called War on Drugs and War on Terror.

The Office of Emergency Services (OES) is responsible for administering the 1033 Program in California. It keeps an up-to-date inventory of federal military transfers occurring within the state. However, according to the Assembly on Local Government’s analysis of AB39, the OES has not made that information publicly available on their website. Recently, the cities of Davis and San Jose decided to return surplus equipment acquired under the program.

Making the local approval requirement pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act ensures that the public can be a part of the process if they want. The law was enacted in response to mounting public concerns over informal, undisclosed meetings held by local elected officials. City councils, county boards, and other local government bodies were avoiding public scrutiny by holding secret “workshops” and “study sessions.” It requires, among other things, notice for meetings and the ability of the public to attend in person.


in March, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie signed a similar bill into law, making his state the first in the country to push questions of federal militarization to the local level. A broader bill, with an outright ban on receiving certain military weapons or even purchasing them with federal grants was signed into law last month by Montana Gov. Steve Bullock.

Similar bills are up for consideration in Massachusetts, Minnesota, Washington State and elsewhere. “These states are taking important first steps towards ending this federal militarization and control of local police,” said Michael Boldin of the Tenth Amendment Center. “As James Madison taught us, refusing to cooperate with federal programs in multiple states is the most effective way to bring them down.”

For California: Take steps to support this bill at THIS LINK.

For other states: Take action to push back against federal militarization of your police at this link.

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.