In this episode of Thoughts from Maharrey Head, I try to push beyond the simple soundbites in the Confederate flag debate.
[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/211999192″ params=”color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false” width=”100%” height=”166″ iframe=”true” /]
After listening to the Confederate flag debate for several days, I was left feeling like neither “side” of the issue really captures the crux of the matter.
One side screams racism. One side screams heritage. You know, maybe they are both right from a certain point of view. But I think the controversy illuminates some deeper more important issues.
In this week’s podcast, I try to dig beyond the 30 second soundbites and the Facebook memes to uncover some of the more substantive issues beneath the debate. Should things be banned? Does every reference to the Confederacy imply support for slavery? And what does all of this mean in the context of state sovereignty, political self-determination and decentralization?
You can subscribe to Thoughts from Maharrey Head on iTunes. Just click HERE.
- To the Governor: Arkansas Bill to Expand Gold and Silver Legal Tender Act - April 16, 2025
- Oklahoma Senate Committee Passes Bill to Expand Gold and Silver as Legal Tender - April 16, 2025
- Defend the Guard Act Passes First Step in Missouri - April 14, 2025