NASHVILLE, Tenn. (Sept. 22, 2016) – On Tuesday, the Nashville Metro Council voted to decriminalize marijuana within the city limits, a step toward effectively nullifying prohibition in practice.

Under the new ordinance, Nashville police will have the option of reducing the penalty for people in possession of a half-ounce of marijuana or less to a $50 fine or 10 hours of community service. The council passed the measure overwhelmingly 35-3.

Councilman Dave Rosenberg sponsored the legislation.

“All this bill does is give police the option of not treating someone with a little pot like a hardened criminal,” Rosenberg said. “Because when you start treating good members of our society like criminals they begin acting like criminals.”

Nashville Mayor Megan Barry said in a statement she plans to sign the measure into law.

“This legislation is a positive step forward in addressing the overly punitive treatment of marijuana possession in our state that disproportionately impacts low-income and minority residents.”

The Memphis City Council will take up a similar measure in two weeks.

Under the new law, police will still have the option of arresting people caught with marijuana under state law. In that case they would face a Class A misdemeanor charge punishable by up to one year in jail and a $2,500 fine.

But some legislators at the state level don’t approve of Nashville loosening the screws on marijuana users. Rep. William Lamberth (R-Cottontown) told The Tennessean he is “strongly considering” filing a state bill that would cut highway funds to cities that do not enforce state marijuana laws.

“That’s not a bill that I would want to file, but it’s a bill that I’m certainly willing to file if Nashville and Memphis continue down this extraordinarily reckless and unjust path,” Lamberth said.

Lamberth would make an excellent U.S. Senator with his burning desire to coerce reticent localities into doing his will. His tactic exactly follows the strategy the federal government uses to force states into doing all kinds of things they don’t want to. In fact, Lamberth doesn’t like it when the feds stick their nose in Tennessee’s business. He threw a fit over federal mandates relating to transgendered restrooms in schools, calling it “entirely a local issue.” One wonders why he feels to compelled to interfere with entirely local marijuana policy in Nashville.

The bottom line is the state shouldn’t interfere with local issues any more than the feds should interfere with state issues. Nashville Councilman Russ Pulley took issue with Lambreth, calling his plan “big government overreach, according to The Tennessean, saying the state legislature should use “reason and common sense” when addressing the issue.

“I would ask you, who is better able to understand the issues involving the city of Nashville than the members of this body who are in touch with our citizens on a daily basis?”

Impact on State and Federal Prohibition

This local decriminalization effort represents a kind of local version of the anti-commandeering doctrine.

The Supreme Court has long held that the federal government cannot force states to assist with implementation of enforcement of federal acts or programs. When states refuse to cooperate with federal enforcement, it makes it extremely difficult for the feds to assert their will. This has proved particularly true when it comes to marijuana. State legalization of weed and the end of state enforcement nullifies federal prohibition in practice. FBI statistics reveal law enforcement makes approximately 99 of 100 marijuana arrests under state, not federal law. The federal government simply lacks the resources to enforce its marijuana laws on its own. We’ve seen this play out in every state that has legalized marijuana for medical or general use.

Strategically, this kind of local action can have an impact at the state level in the same way state action has impacted the feds. If enough cities and counties in Tennessee decriminalize marijuana, and the state legislature resists Lambreth’s efforts to interfere with local will, it could conceivably nullify state law to at least some degree. As more and more political subdivisions implement similar policies, it will increase pressure to change the law at the state level. When the state decriminalizes marijuana, it will nullify federal prohibition in effect, just as it has in other states.

This is a powerful strategy we can use to rein in federal overreach with a total bottom up approach, starting at the local level, and then working up through the state, ultimately eroding federal power completely away.

Mike Maharrey

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.