Stare decisis is the doctrine of precedent – that a court should rule the way a previous court did – even when the judges of the second court disagree with the earlier. Is there a way to apply this doctrine without putting the precedent at a higher standing than the Constitution itself?

Path to Liberty: September 21, 2020

Subscribe: iTunes | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS

SHOW LINKS:
JOIN TAC

Show Archives

Subscribe and Review on iTunes

State of the Nullification Movement Report

Barnett: Stare Decisis for Originalist Judges

Supreme Court as a Legislature: A Dissent

Federalist 78

Federalist 81

Wurman: Stare Decisis in an Originalist Theory of Law

Berger: Government by Judiciary

Bigger Problem Underlies Supreme Court Fight

The Supreme Court Issues Opinions, not Law

ALTERNATE VIDEO SOURCES
Watch on LBRY

Watch on Brighteon

Watch on BitTube

Watch on Bitchute

Watch on Twitch.tv

Watch on Periscope

Watch on Facebook

Watch on DLive

FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC:

Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/
Email Newsletter: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/register
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest
Brave: Use Brave Browser for Privacy and Help Support TAC

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TenthAmendmentCenter
Twitter: http://twitter.com/tenthamendment
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tenthamendmentcenter/
Periscope: https://www.periscope.tv/TenthAmendment/
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/tenthamendmentcenter
DLive: https://dlive.tv/TenthAmendmentCenter
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tenthamendmentcenter
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/X0AJnBhWbCkx/
Minds: https://www.minds.com/TenthAmendmentCenter
LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@TenthAmendmentCenter

Michael Boldin